First Ghostwriter Images Appear
According to John, the first image appeared on Christmas 1991. He explains that he had felt a presence in the home since moving there in 1990. When his father gave him a Polaroid camera for Christmas in 1991, he thought it would be a good idea to see if he could capture the ghost on camera.
While he was sitting and relaxing, the bathroom door mysteriously opened on its own. John took a shot of the area and the picture came out normal with no signs of paranormal entities. He then closed the door, but was surprised when it opened on its own again. He again took a picture of the area, but this time strange lights appeared in the photo.
John's Friends Communicate with the Ghostwriter
After several attempt to determine why the images appeared, John invited friends over to show them what he had captured. One of his friends asked if the ghost was still present and shot a picture to see if he could capture anything.
The picture contained blotches of light that they later discovered spelled out the word "YES". When the visitors asked the ghost what his name was and then took a picture, the image of the name "Wright" appeared. When the guests pursued with further questioning and asked if he was a good ghost or a bad ghost, the words "FRIEND" are reported to have appeared in the photo. When asked if it was difficult to communicate with them, the spirit responded with "takes a dead lift".
Psychic Explains Spirit Vortex and Portal
John goes on to explain that a psychic had informed him that there was dead body located under the house. He claims the area over the body is a vortex or portal to the spirit world. The area is located in front of the bathroom door. He claims entities enter via this portal, zoom across the room and exit by the stove.
Fact or Faked Team Attempt to Debunk Ghostwriter Images
The Fact or Faked Team attempted to take photos of the area with a Polaroid camera. None of the photos revealed anything unusual. At this point, they decided to explore the possibility that John and his friend's film had been altered prior to taking pictures.
Fact or Faked Pre-exposes the Film
The team painted clear acetate black and scratched words into the acetate to remove the paint in the letters. They then opened new film, in a makeshift dark room, and placed the acetate with the words scratched into it over the film. Holding the acetate onto the film, the team then used the flash to another camera to expose the acetate and film to light. The film was then fed back into the Polaroid cartridge. The cartridge was then loaded into the camera and attempts were made to photograph the spirit portal.
Fact or Faked Declares Ghostwriter Case Inconclusive
The resulting photos revealed both the scratched words and light anomalies that could not be explained. The team declared the experiment inconclusive, as they could not explain the appearance of light in other areas of the photos.
An Explanation for the Light Anomalies?
I was a bit disappointed that they did not repeat the experiment. It seems obvious to me that the light anomalies were the result of stray light that exposed the film during the debunking exercise.
At one point in the video, Chi-Lan appears to hold the acetate over the film with one hand as it is exposed by the light of a camera flash. It seems that if the Fact or Faked team were serious about debunking the ghostwriter pictures, they would have taken more care in preparing the film.
Personal Reactions
I, for one, am not convinced that the light anomalies in their photos are paranormal, and I have doubts about the whole Ghost Writer claims. Could it be real? Yes, I suppose it could be, but the skeptic in me senses it is highly unlikely.
This episode of Fact or Faked left me feeling a bit duped by the half-hearted attempts to debunk or verify paranormal claims. To gain viewer confidence, they will need to work a bit harder to produce quality work for the show. Putting viewers in the position to questions their procedures, and ultimately their results, does little to build confidence in Fact or Faked's ability to take on the task of debunking the paranormal.
Published by Nannette Richford - Featured Contributor in Lifestyle
Nannette Richford is an avid gardener, teacher and nature enthusiast with 4 years experience in online writing and a lifetime of personal journals. As an award winning writer for Demand Studios, Richford has... View profile
- Movie Review: The Ghost WriterReview: As The Ghost Writer opens, a body washes up onshore not far from the Martha's Vineyard hideaway of a former British Prime Minister. 76-year-old Director Roman Polanski directs this moody political thriller.
Roman Polanski's 5 Lessons for "The Ghost Writer"Roman Polanski's new film "The Ghost Writer" isn't exactly an instructional portrait of the craft of ghost writing. Though a ghost writer might heed subsequent advice from Polan...- Film Review: THE GHOST WRITERA review of the film THE GHOST WRITER.
- Movie Review: The Ghost Writer (2010)Movie Review: The Ghost Writer (2010) directed by Roman Polanski, starring Pierce Brosnan, Ewan McGregor, Kim Cattrall, Olivia Williams, Tom Wilkinson
- Academic Ghost WriterThis article discusses the ethics of having a ghost writer.
- Fact or Faked Paranormal Files Meet the Team
- Nightcrawler Fact or Faked Investigation
- Syfy Channel's Latest New Series: Faked or Fact
- Music Urban Legends: Fact or Fiction. Ozzy, Rod, Keith and Others
- How to Become an Independent Medical Ghostwriter
- Ghost Writing: Who or What Are Ghostwriters - and What Are They Ghostwriting?
- Is Michael Jackson Really Dead?




9 Comments
Post a CommentI am in agreement over the last episode including a spider and its web. I didn't finish watching the show after that point. During the first viewing of that video I stated, "that's a spider web". Somehow these "experts" never figured that out. Regarding the ghostwriter episode... I took one class on photography and knew what caused their test to fail. These experts have no credibility. I was looking forward to the show but the experiments are badly done. I can see why the FBI isn't still paying for Ben's expertise.
I agree with Michael C. because this last episode "the caretaker" Was a Spider in its web!!!!!!! I don't have the words to describe the stupidity of this episode. Not only can tou see the spider but the web and the bugs it has caught that night also.
I just finished watching this episode, and like everyone else I felt cheated by the efforts they put forth to solve the cases. I was dumbfounded by the "half assed" ideas they came up with to try to debunk the case. I could have told Chan Li (or whatever her name is)that her solutions would never work. For someone with "years of photography experience" she came across as totally incompetent and clueless as to what to do for a solution. I swear, my experience as an artist (30+ years illustration, design, photography) I wanted to yell at the TV to tell them better ideas.Step it up Fact or Faked, you are losing my attention, and soon my DVR Spot!
The show's problem is they are trying to cover two subjects in one hour. It feels too much like an effort to fill a gap they already filled, with Destination Truth. Fact or Faked is more of a half-hearted think tank. Just because you CAN recreate something that was filmed or photographed, does not preclude that the original was faked, nor does the inability to NOT recreate something mean it was real.
I agree that the crew's efforts to replicate these events were half-hearted to say the least. The homeowner is the one who took the original pictures, why didn't they go with him to buy a polaroid camera and then have him take the pictures?
Nice... :o)
So, Bill, what did you think or the show and the Ghostwriter images?
I watched this last night.
very well done