Foxes are imprisoned in cages only 2.5 feet square and minks in cages 1 foot by 3 feet, with up to four animals per cage. Caged fur farm animals develop neurotic behaviors such as pacing, turning in endless circles, self-mutilation, and even cannibalization. Most live unnaturally short lives: 5 months for minks, 9 months for foxes.
Animals often languish in traps for days. Up to a quarter of all trapped animals escape by chewing off their own feet, later dying from blood loss, fever, infection, or predation. Beavers drown slowly (up to 20 minutes) in underwater traps.
Each year approximately 5 million dogs, cats, blue jays, owls, chipmunks, swans, golden eagles, and even threatened and endangered species are accidentally crippled and killed by extremely cruel steel-jaw leghold traps. Trapping is allowed on more than half of the National Wildlife Refuge system. Steel-jaw leghold traps are used on half of the NWR land allowing trapping. In a Princeton poll, 74% of Americans believed that steel-jaw leghold traps should be banned.
Trappers usually strangle, beat, or stomp trapped animals to death. On fur farms, animals are gassed, anally electrocuted, poisoned, or their necks are snapped.
It costs more than three times as much energy to make a coat from trapped animal pelts and 60 times as much energy from ranch-raised animal pelts as it does to make a fake fur coat. One 40-inch fur coat requires the deaths of:
· 16 coyotes
· 15 beavers
· 20 otters
· 42 red foxes
· 40 raccoons
· 60 wild minks
· 18 lynx
· 45 opossums
· 100 squirrels
· 50 sables
· 8 seals
· 50 muskrats
A May 2007 Gallup poll indicated that 38% of those polled feel that "buying and wearing clothing made of animal fur" is morally wrong. Among the many "good guys" in the fashion industry who don't use fur are Stella McCartney, Ann Taylor, Betsey Johnson, Eddie Bauer, Todd Oldham, Tommy Hilfiger, Bill Blass, Ann Klein, and The Gap, with others planning on eliminating it from their collections in the near future. And fur sales are down approximately 50% since the late 80s, despite manipulation of statistics in their favor by fur manufacturers.
One of the fur industry's current propaganda points to try to appeal to the environmentalist crowd by claiming that fur is biodegradable. What they fail to mention is that furs are treated with dangerous chemicals to prevent decomposition in the consumer's closet. Toxic chemicals used at fur manufacturing plants pollute streams and cause high cancer rates among workers. Waste from fur farm animals is a major source of water pollution.
The beleaguered fur industry is also trying, with some success, to appeal to the younger, less prosperous consumer by offering cheaper fur-trimmed items. Unfortunately, a lot of this trim is sold as "faux fur", even though it's the real thing. Be aware that what is often labeled "faux fur" may be imported dog and cat fur from China. A bill now in Congress addresses that issue. You can write to your Congressional representative to co-sponsor H.R. 891, the Dog and Cat Fur Prohibition Enforcement Act of 2007. Its purpose is to protect consumers and animals by requiring that all fur products be labeled and by banning the sale of fur from raccoon dogs, who are killed in large numbers in China, sometimes by being skinned alive.
Another current fur industry selling point is that fur is just animal skin without the hair, so if you think it's OK to wear leather, you should have no moral qualms about wearing fur. Fur purveyors are quite correct that there is no clear ethical difference between wearing leather and fur-you should not wear either one, but you can at least make a start by eschewing fur first. How can you help get out the truth about fur? By writing letters to the editor; sending e-mail to, or phoning your legislators to support fur animal protection legislation; participating in traditional Fur Free Friday demonstrations the day after Thanksgiving; informing the managers of stores that sell furs that you as a consumer are unhappy with their policy; writing to fashion magazines that display fur on their pages; and making friends and family aware of the sad plight of millions of fur-bearing animals in the U.S. as well as worldwide.
Published by Barbara Joan Baxter
Barbara Joan is a freelance writer/editor/publisher/webhead and the proud guardian of ten dogs and cats. Books of poems and a memoir are in the works. View profile
- The Fur Findings of the Humane Society of the United States Spurs New Garment Labe...The Humane Society of the United States has discovered many faux fur products are actually made of dog fur. A number of big name brands have been selling the garments. Lawmakers spurred into creating legislation.
- Fur Fashion in 2007: Common Sense in AmericaFrom one end of the United States to the other, fur has swung into full fashion, firmly entrenching itself, cropping up in every form, from the traditional to the wild. Common sense is triumphing over illogical rheto...
- If Animals Could Vote, Would They Vote for Obama?The Humane Society's Obama endorsement raises some interesting, perhaps surprising, questions on the role of animal rights in the general election. Laura Schleifer writes on why future candidates may want to pay atten...
- Pet Hoarders - Controlling the Amount of Animals in a HomeIn an effort to save homeless animals some people become inundated with more animals than they can handle
- The Truth About the Fur Industry
- A Fashionable Death
- Fur Farms: Torture Chambers and Slaughter Houses
- Faux Fur
- Attention Consumers: Jay-Z and Sean "P. Diddy" Combs - "Faux Fur" Clothing Lines:...
- Best Women's Faux Fur Jackets and Coats
- Your Faux Fur Probably is Real Fur!



6 Comments
Post a CommentDawn, I know it's sometimes considered bad form to diss the spelling and grammar of a fellow Internet poster, but you really would be more credible to me and others as a serious critic and an informed person if you did a spell check, e.g., you misspelled "outweighed", "argument" and "amateur". And IMO, "amatuer-like" is poor English AND bad spelling. Thanks for your input.
suffer and die at all, for no reason? Does splitting hairs over exactly how many animals are killed in fur farming vs trapping somehow make wearing fur OK? Also, the fur industry uses toxic chemicals to produce their products. It’s illogical for anyone to argue, “Ah ha! Your stats are off, therefore killing animals for their fur is not inhumane!†Tell that to the "fur" animals who die needlessly. If only a thousand each year were killed, that would still be too many. There’s such a huge amount of gratuitous cruelty in this world: human to human, human to nonhuman—that reducing it anywhere, to any degree, is always a significant ethical advance for our often thoughtless species. I don't care if you hate my article, but please consider decreasing your individual contribution to animal cruelty, because every person counts, just as every animal counts.
Dawn, as Mark Twain allegedly said, there are "lies, damned lies, and statistics". I don't know where you get your particular stats (you don't say), but numbers are not the important issue here. For the sake of argument, let’s say you’re right and there are ten times more animals incarcerated in fur farms than trapped; and that the trapped animals are "only" in the trap for two days with no food or water and are miraculously never injured, even with leg hold traps (which are still perfectly legal in my state and others, BTW, and also injure and kill pets and other wild animals); and that I'm totally wrong and fur industry animals are shot, never strangled, electrocuted, or skinned alive to protect the fur (which they unquestionably are). Would that justify the fur industry in your eyes? Is cruelty to animals just a numbers game for you, merely a question of how much you make the animal suffer and how many animals suffer, not that you make them suf
I could see even in the first sentance that your facts on this article are wrong. There are MILLIONS more ranch fur products than wild caught. It's outwieghed by like 10 to 1.
Trapped animals by law need to be out of the trap in two days, and will never chew their foot off. And most traps are no longer foot traps anyhow. Foot traps are illegal in most areas worldwide. Only cage traps are legal. And foot traps are made to hold the animal, not break his foot. The animals are typically shot- not strangled or beaten.
And it also takes more energy to make a faux fur coat than to make a real fur one.
I honestly get your arguement, but I just wish your facts were legitimate. Had you done your research properly I would have applauded this article, but it simply seems poorly written and amatuer-like to me.
Thanks, Lain. I appreciate your support.
I love this article, I love that someone has said exactly what needs to be said, that there is absolutely no reason to wear fur. I really hope this article gets the attention it deserves.