Fantasy Sports Game Providers Win Victory in New Jersey Court

Lawsuit Vs. ESPN, CBS Sportsline, and the Sporting News Dismissed

Roger Gowens
In the U.S. District Court of New Jersey last Friday June 22, Judge Dennis Cavanaugh dismissed a lawsuit filed by a Charles E. Humphrey, Jr. against ESPN, CBSSportsline, The Sporting News and other fantasy sports game providers. Humphrey claimed in his suit that fantasy sports are form of gambling because the fantasy sports providers offer pay for play online fantasy sports games. The suit was filed on June 20, 2006, and Humphrey sought damages from the fantasy sports gamers citing several states' "qui tam" laws. Even though Charles E. Humphrey, Jr. has never played any of the fantasy sports games himself.

"This is a huge day for the fantasy sports industry" said Bill Heberer of Manatt, Phelps and Phillips LLC, which represented CBSSportsline and The Sporting News. Judge Cavanaugh cited the recently passed Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act, stating "that law confirms that fantasy sports leagues such as those operated by the defendants, do not constitute gambling as a matter of law". Cavanaugh thus provided future guidance of the legality of the fantasy sports industry within the decision.

This decision proves one thing for sure. That is that even in this world gone mad, that sometimes Judges still make decisions that actually make sense. The most head-scratching aspect of this case is that Humphrey didn't even try to hide the fact that he has never played any fantasy sport. In the strictest sense of the word, I suppose one could call fantasy sports "gambling". In many leagues, including one I participate in, there is an entry fee with prizes for division winners, the highest weekly score, the most total points scored for the regular season, and finally the most points in the postseason.

However, as anyone knows who has played fantasy sports, fantasy football (the most popular fantasy sport by far) in particular, requires knowledge of the most productive players, injuries, etc. Anyone can get lucky with one or two players carrying them to victory once in awhile, but to score well for an entire season is a skill,. Thus, fantasy sports are games of skill, not luck. The winners names are not drawn out of a hat, or by some kind of draw like the lottery.

I hail this decision by the court and hope that the decision serves as a deterrent for the filing of such frivolous lawsuits in the future. In an article on fantasy football written last fall, I discussed the phenomon of fantasy football. Please give it a read (shameless plug). The article entitled Fantasy Football: Oxygenic or Oxymoron discusses the popularity of fantasy football and the effect it has in the workplace. It was my very first article on AC, so now on article #100, it looks like we've come full circle. Fantasy football will be heating up soon, with league drafts and so on, so do your homework before your league draft.

For those of you who need fantasy football advice, give www.fantasyfootballstar a try. The site is not up yet, but will be soon. I am a feature writer for the site, by the way, but don't let that stop you. Good luck, I mean, fortune in your league this fall.

Published by Roger Gowens

Venture to the RazorsEdge to read about a variety of topics. Some inform, some entertain, my goal is to do both. I am available for freelance work. Contact rgo72904@yahoo.com. This is Roger Gowens and I appr...   View profile

  • Fantasy Sports do not constitute gambling according to the decision
  • The Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act says that fantasy sports are not gambling
  • The man who filed the lawsuit has never even played fantasy sports

3 Comments

Post a Comment
  • RazorsEdge 6/28/2007

    I'm not sure, don't speak legalese, but it was in the press release. Yeah, as a fantasy football writer and player, it would have been a disaster for millions of us. Thanks for reading, Michael.

  • Michael Grisso 6/28/2007

    thats hilarious, that Humpherey character sounded like he was in need of some money or something. Why in the world would you sue if you don't play anyways. Can you imagine if that had passed? All the online games that have tournaments and that like Yahoo Games, and others similar. Talk about fuel on the fire! Hey I have not seen the term qui tam before. What is that?

  • Zac Wassink 6/27/2007

    wow i hadnt heard about this yet and i live in jersey. great article

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.