FCC to Decide on 'Net Neutrality' Thursday

Will it Mean More or Less Government Control?

Sheryl Young
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is scheduled to vote this Thursday on "Net Neutrality," otherwise known as "Open Internet Rules" - the capability for total openness of the Internet to high-speed traffic from all legal sources without any limitations. Technology in broadband, wired and wireless will all be affected.

FCC discussions on this issue have been going on for about three years, so the long-awaited vote has created both eager anticipation and hysteria. Internet markets, certain media outlets, government expansion watchdog groups and Congress have weighed in on both sides.

Pros & Cons:

A cnet Report leads to a letter that was sent to the FCC in support of Net Neutrality by numerous influential internet companies including Amazon, Google, Mozilla, Twitter and YouTube. The companies site advantages like the ability to create new internet resources and healthy competition. Readers can view the entire letter here.

Adversely, there is speculation in an MSNBC report that the vote is being rushed by the new administration; and citing that there are voices on both sides of Congress who feel the government hasn't proven a need for more regulation yet. (Side note: Comcast did get in trouble last year for limiting access to certain services, but that case is not yet settled.)

Other critics fear that FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski's claims of this "not [being] about government regulation," yet stating during the same Brookings Institute speech that the FCC will "establish rules of the road" could actually lead to more government regulation. The fact that the FCC will need to ensure that everyone's allowed equal traffic could be:
- a government invasion in itself; or
- a drawback for more people or smaller companies to invest due to a high cost for implementation, thereby giving an uneven playing field back to only the powerhouse companies.

On Monday night 10/19, Glenn Beck began a week-long series on his FOX-TV show thinking ahead to what the FCC "Net Neutrality" could mean to the entire issue of Freedom of Speech, should the vote go the way of including a Fairness Doctrine-type demand that stretches to Internet Radio and demands equal time on all stations for opposing viewpoints.

Since about 2003, High-speed internet access connections in the U.S. have gone from 4 million to more than 50 million. FCC Chairman Genachowski wants a neutrality plan by 2010.

Genachowski was nominated by President Obama for Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, was confirmed, and took office in June, 2009. He is a magna cum laude Harvard graduate with a long public service record. See his full Bio here. Genachowski's background does not appear as controversial as does his co-worker's, Mark Lloyd, a fervent supporter of the Fairness Doctrine, which policy experts and pundits say is anything but fair in its philosophy and may be another tool that far left Democrats are influencing the FCC to implement.

Sources:

Comcast problems, Washington Post

cnet Reports here and here.

Internet Coalition Letter supporting FCC

MSNBC Report

Glenn Beck, 5 p.m., Mon., 10/19/09.

Genachowski's 9/21/09 Speech at Brookings Institute

Genachowski's Biography

Published by Sheryl Young - Featured Contributor in Politics

Freelance writer since 1997; Featured Political Contributor for Yahoo!; Tampa Tribune Community Columnist/Blogger; Chicken Soup for the Soul; Amy Foundation National Writing Award; happy wife, proud step-mom...  View profile

66 Comments

Post a Comment
  • R. Elizabeth C. Kitchen12/10/2009

    Nicely Written :)

  • Sheri Fresonke Harper10/30/2009

    Tweeted this, you should try it :)

  • Sheri Fresonke Harper10/30/2009

    Appreciated the background :)

  • J P Whickson10/29/2009

    I heard about this and my first thought was government control. It's a slippery slope and I think that any type of intervention, except for stopping illegal stuff like child pornography, is our beginning step down the icy way.

  • Sandy James10/28/2009

    Nice article on a controversial subject. It'll be interesting to see how this plays out. I enjoy your writings.

  • Jedley Manimtim10/27/2009

    Great reporting, Sheryl!

  • David Van Edema10/27/2009

    Thanks for going into this more in detail, Sheryl. I've seen this in the headlines and briefly mentioned in the news, but they didn't go into as much detail as you did.

  • Lorraine Yapps Cohen10/27/2009

    Controlling the Internet? Piece of cake for the current administration! After all, they're determined to change the laws of physics. You might like my AC article on that subject. Keep your point of view coming, Sheryl.

  • C. L. Collins10/26/2009

    Another attempt by the Obama administration to stifle freedom of speech. Good job!

  • SAIKAT KUMAR DUTTA10/25/2009

    Good info, nice job again...

Displaying Comments
Next »

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.