What this means for you and me is that by far the only cancer drugs that will ever be approved by the FDA, are the ones that individual drug company's can patent. Due to this process, cancer drugs that may be more effective may never see the light of day because they are just not as profitable. Unfortunately, cancer has become big business.
Case in point, Doctors Michelakis and Archer of the University of Alberta in Canada have found that a drug called DCA (sodium dichloroacetate) shrinks cancer cells. It has been shown to be effective against lung, breast and brain cancer cells (source). Cancerous cells shut down or suppress the mitochondria. DCA will reactivate the mitochondria, killing the cancer cell directly and not hurting the non-cancerous cells.
DCA is an inexpensive drug that has been used to treat humans for metabolic disorders and lactic acidosis. It has shown to have little side effects, but has not been approved by the FDA to treat cancer. When the research first came out DCA was available online, but the FDA moved in quickly and shut them down threatening criminal charges.
This drug cannot be patented, and therefore is not profitable. Fortunately the researchers at the University of Alberta are more interested in saving lives than making money. They are slowly trying to raise money to comply with the FDA's demand for more clinical studies. They are holding auctions and asking for private donations.
The FDA is even regulating vitamins at this point. If a vitamin supplement company makes any type of health claim, they will be threatened with criminal charges. I think it is ridiculous, as the whole point of taking vitamins is to achieve a certain health benefit. With cancer, I believe there are certain vitamins that may raise your immunity and even help to prevent or fight cancer.
In conclusion, I believe many alternative methods for treating cancer have a lot of merit. Simply because we do not have millions of dollars to spend to acquire FDA approval on some of these treatments does not indicate they are ineffective.
Published by Rebecca Said
Rebecca Said enjoys writing about a wide variety of subjects. Strong interests include animal welfare, dogs and cats, internet marketing and politics. View profile
- New Nanotechnology Technique Can Differentiate Cancer Cells from Normal CellsA new nanotechnology technique may increase the efficacy of cancer diagnosis.
- Breast Cancer Cells May Spread Earlier Than ThoughtUntil now small and confined breast cancer tumors have been considered to be non-invasive. Newest research shows even small tumors have the ability to spread thereby requiring harsher treatment methods.
- Radiation Sensitivity for Cancer Cells Could Be Achieved by Targeting DNABy targeting an enzyme present in the DNA of cells, researchers hope to make cancer more sensitive to radiation therapy without affecting normal cells.
- Cancer Health Care Consultants: What to Look forIf you have recently been diagnosed with cancer and feel like you are grasping at straws for answers then you may want to consider hiring a cancer health care consultant to help you.
- What the Cure for Cancer Will BeThe cure for cancer lies in a very mysterious enzyme -- the same enzyme that anti-aging researchers believe is the key to living for hundreds of years.
- Dichloroacetate (DCA): A Cure for Cancer?
- Is There a Cure for Cancer? The Answer May Surprise You
- Pectin Causes Self-Destruction of Prostate Cancer Cells
- Could There Be a Cure for Breast Cancer in the Near Future?
- Seneca Valley Virus Kills Cancer Cells
- Turmeric Spice Kills Throat Cancer Cells
- Pectin in Fruits, Vegetables Kills Prostate Cancer Cells
