FDA Issues "Final Rule" to Regulate Safety of Dietary Supplements
Some Experts Question Efficacy of Regulation
The FDA's website explains that the final rule ensures that supplements will not have "wrong ingredients, too much or too little of a dietary ingredient, improper packaging, improper labeling, contamination problems due to natural toxins, or bacteria, pesticides, glass, lead, or other substances."
The final rule is an attempt to shore up some deficiencies of the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA). DSHEA established that dietary supplements, unlike new drugs, don't have to go through review by FDA for safety and efficacy prior to being marketed. In an interview on abcnews.com, Vasilios Frankos, division director of the office of dietary supplements at the FDA, explained that "[The final rule] tries to be more specific about regulating the processes used to make diet supplements, which are quite different from the way you process food."
Experts see the rule as a positive step, but remain skeptical about the FDA's ability to enforce the new regulations. ABCnews.com cites Keith Ayoob, associate professor of pediatrics at Albert Einstein College of Medicine, who states "The ruling is appropriate, but it will just be a paper tiger if there is no FDA staff to monitor things. The big pharm companies that do supplements will be compliant. The ones I'm more worried about are the fringe companies that produce nothing but supplements. ... If they get caught, they'll just fold up shop and reopen under another name."
In addition, many note that the final rule does not address the effectiveness of dietary supplements. ABCnews.com quotes Dr. Jerry Avorn, chief of pharmacoepidemiology and pharmacoeconomics at Brigham and Women's Hospital, who says it best: "Knowing you have pure and well-made useless crap is a little better than having impure useless crap, but not by much."
Finally, the new regulations do not change how the FDA monitors the safety of dietary supplements. With new drugs, the pharmaceutical companies are responsible for demonstrating the safety of the drug. However, in the case of dietary supplements, the FDA has the responsibility of proving that the drug is unsafe before it is pulled.
Sources:
Published by Michael Lutz
I am a freelance writer/researcher interested in all things related to nutrition and fitness. View profile
- Review of the On Gold Standard Dietary Supplement, 100% Instantized Whey, Cookies...The On Gold Standard Dietary Supplement, 100% Instantized Whey is my choice of protein supplement. Though this is not a power booster like the BSN Syntha-6 it is by far better than other protein drinks.
- All New Glyco-Flex III Canine Dietary Supplement ReviewThe All New Glyco-Flex III is a brilliant canine dietary supplement that is formulated to fight against joint problems and combat arthritis. My 11 year old Shepard started showing signs of aging and gets tired soon ev...
- Missing Links Plus with Glucosamine Canine Dietary Supplement ReviewThe Missing Link is an exclusive dietary supplement developed by a Veterinary doctor for the canine.
Product Review: Ultra 90 Dietary SupplementI began hearing advertisements for the dietary supplement Ultra 90 on the radio. It seemed no matter which radio station I tuned to at some point there was an advertisement for...- VPX NO-Shotgun Dietary Supplement ReviewThe VPX NO-Shotgun is a miraculous dietary supplement that facilitates in pumping outstanding muscles. You become a real macho in a short span of time.
- Potential Dangers of Dietary Supplements to Health
- Dietary Supplements May Contain Dangerous Contaminants
- Dietary Supplements: Some Consumer Considerations
- Healthy Children Shouldn't Take Dietary Supplements, Experts Say
- Stop the Government from Taking Our Dietary Supplements!
- Alternative Healing at Risk with John McCain's Proposed Dietary Supplements Bill
- A Review of On Gold Standard Dietary Supplement with the 100 Percent Natural Whey

