Field Goals: When is a Field Goal Attempt Successful

"Upon Discussion on the Field..."

Mo Morrissey
Rule 11, Section 5, Article 1, Paragraph c of the Official NFL Rule Book states, "The entire ball must pass through the goal. In case wind or other forces cause it to return through the goal, it must have struck the ground or some object or person before returning."

In week 11 of the 2007 NFL season, we saw two such instances of a field goal attempt striking "some object" and returning through the goal.

Instance 1: Cleveland Browns v. Baltimore Ravens

The "New" Cleveland Browns - the successor franchise to the history and records of the original Cleveland Browns - went into Baltimore at 5-4 on the season to face not the Baltimore Colts, the cities historic team, but the Baltimore Ravens - the "Original Browns" which left the city of Cleveland after the 1995 season to become the Baltimore Ravens.

The clock stood at 0:04 seconds with Cleveland at the Baltimore 33 yard line. The Ravens had just gone ahead on a 47-yard field goal with 31-seconds remaining after coming back from a touchdown deficit. It took the Browns one 39-yard kickoff return, two passing plays and 26-seconds to drive within field goal distance.

The kick sailed straight and true, until just before reaching the uprights. Wind took the ball to the left and it clanged off the left upright, was redirected down, clanged off the stanchion behind the goal and returned through the goals.

The Ravens had apparently won the battle of "The Browns." The players, however, were told not to leave the field. For over 4 minutes the teams remained on the sidelines, when the head referee returned to the field to announce that after "discussion on the field," the field goal was good and the game went into over time. In OT, the Browns won the toss and drove for almost 6-minutes before Phil Dawson kicked a 33-yard field goal to win the game.

Instance 2: New England Patriots v. Buffalo Bills

The 9-0 Patriots were leading the Bills 42-7 in the third quarter. The Bills had advanced the ball to the Patriots 34-yard line, but their 6-play drive fizzled. At 4th down and 7, rather than take the chance of getting a new set of downs in a blowout game, the Bills elected to go for a long field goal.

Ryan Lindell lined up for a 53-yard attempt for the 7th play of the drive. The ball sailed straight and true through the uprights, and clanged off the NBC television camera mounted on the upright stanchion, approximately where Dawson's kick had bounced a few hours earlier, and back through the uprights.

Having had the experience of the Browns game earlier, this time the call was correctly made in short order and the field goal counted. Patriots 42 - Bills 10.

Published by Mo Morrissey

Mo has a lifetime of experience as a suffering Red Sox fan, but is a general jack of all trades.  View profile

  • The entire ball must pass through the goal
  • It must strike another object or person before returning
Rule 11, Section 5, Article 1 of the Official NFL Rule Book states, "The entire ball must pass through the goal. In case wind or other forces cause it to return through the goal, it must have struck the ground or some object or person before returning."

5 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Rocky Mak & Tim Howard II11/21/2007

    The Phil Dawson one was very common to me in Madden. I twice tempted fate and used my Superstar kicker to do a 75-yarder. On the one I made, the ball bounced the top of the cross bar twice and the extension once before it went in. The CPU challenged but the referee was correct in calling that field goal as good.

    I wonder: If the Raiders kicker hit the crossbar instead on the sidebar in his history-breaking field goal attempt, the record books could've been changed.

  • wassup47111/20/2007

    Some of these higher-ups are really screwing up...even if they're acting in the best interest of the game. What on earth can't you review a field goal?!?! As if the NFL couldn't station a couple of MORE cameras...

  • Fragnoli11/19/2007

    No doubt, the NFL definitely has a mess on their hands right here.

  • Fragnoli11/19/2007

    I can see where Billick would be upset though, as the call isn't labeled as reviewable and the call was definitely overturned.

  • Ryan Lester11/18/2007

    I guess lighting does strike twice.

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.