COMMENTARY | While many Americans might think it far too early for a presidential debate, some candidates for the GOP nomination hit the ground running Thursday with a debate in South Carolina. Most of the supposed favorites sat it out, including Mitt Romney. There were some surprises mixed with the same old story.
The first surprise came at the beginning from Fox News anchor Bret Baier, who moderated the debate. The expected attacks on President Obama were present, especially from Rick Santorum and Tim Pawlenty.
What are three things that stood out?
Serious Questions
That it was a Fox News-sponsored GOP debate and some tough questions were asked was a refreshing viewing experience. Baier started it off going straight to the quandary most of the GOP is having right now - how to deal with President Obama's success against Osama bin Laden.
"He doesn't understand America's place in the world, America's place in history. He is weak," Baier said, quoting Tim Pawlenty. "Does he still look weak?"
The former governor of Minnesota took the first half of his time thanking Fox News, the other candidates, the South Carolina GOP, then finally, begrudgingly, acknowledged Obama's success.
For the most part, the trend continued with Baier, and the rest of the panel asked some decent questions too. Of course, there were some obligatory softballs, but not what one would expect. Was it because none of the candidates favored by Fox pundits were on the stage, or did Baier set out to actually be "Fair and Balanced?"
Rick Santorum same as he ever was
The uber-conservative Santorum clearly wanted to focus on red meat social issues. When asked about other issues, he fell back to familiar territory. The former Pennsylvania senator blasted the idea that conservatives should shy away from social issues this election cycle and focus instead on the economy and other issues more important to mainstream Americans.
"Anybody that would suggest we call a truce on moral issues doesn't understand what America is all about," Santorum said.
On foreign policy, he said he could only manage to say everything President Obama has done right is rooted in George Bush.
Santorum said of policy decisions made by Obama, "he has gotten it wrong every time," essentially noting Bush could do nothing wrong and Obama can't do anything right.
Strong anti-war message
Former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson joined Ron Paul in decrying the military interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq.
"I really thought there was no threat to our national security," Johnson said about Iraq, strongly bucking the party line. He also said he wouldn't favor a time line for withdrawal from Afghanistan, that the "timetable should be tomorrow."
Texas Rep. Ron Paul was as strong in his anti-war position as he has been in the past.
"We went to Afghanistan to get him (bin Laden) and he hasn't been there. Now that he's killed, boy it is a wonderful time for this country now to reassess it and get the troops out of Afghanistan and end that war," Paul thundered.
That message will find welcoming ears with people across the political spectrum. If the thrust of the military debate turns to winding down war, we can actually begin to see the end of huge military involvement.
The first surprise came at the beginning from Fox News anchor Bret Baier, who moderated the debate. The expected attacks on President Obama were present, especially from Rick Santorum and Tim Pawlenty.
What are three things that stood out?
Serious Questions
That it was a Fox News-sponsored GOP debate and some tough questions were asked was a refreshing viewing experience. Baier started it off going straight to the quandary most of the GOP is having right now - how to deal with President Obama's success against Osama bin Laden.
"He doesn't understand America's place in the world, America's place in history. He is weak," Baier said, quoting Tim Pawlenty. "Does he still look weak?"
The former governor of Minnesota took the first half of his time thanking Fox News, the other candidates, the South Carolina GOP, then finally, begrudgingly, acknowledged Obama's success.
For the most part, the trend continued with Baier, and the rest of the panel asked some decent questions too. Of course, there were some obligatory softballs, but not what one would expect. Was it because none of the candidates favored by Fox pundits were on the stage, or did Baier set out to actually be "Fair and Balanced?"
Rick Santorum same as he ever was
The uber-conservative Santorum clearly wanted to focus on red meat social issues. When asked about other issues, he fell back to familiar territory. The former Pennsylvania senator blasted the idea that conservatives should shy away from social issues this election cycle and focus instead on the economy and other issues more important to mainstream Americans.
"Anybody that would suggest we call a truce on moral issues doesn't understand what America is all about," Santorum said.
On foreign policy, he said he could only manage to say everything President Obama has done right is rooted in George Bush.
Santorum said of policy decisions made by Obama, "he has gotten it wrong every time," essentially noting Bush could do nothing wrong and Obama can't do anything right.
Strong anti-war message
Former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson joined Ron Paul in decrying the military interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq.
"I really thought there was no threat to our national security," Johnson said about Iraq, strongly bucking the party line. He also said he wouldn't favor a time line for withdrawal from Afghanistan, that the "timetable should be tomorrow."
Texas Rep. Ron Paul was as strong in his anti-war position as he has been in the past.
"We went to Afghanistan to get him (bin Laden) and he hasn't been there. Now that he's killed, boy it is a wonderful time for this country now to reassess it and get the troops out of Afghanistan and end that war," Paul thundered.
That message will find welcoming ears with people across the political spectrum. If the thrust of the military debate turns to winding down war, we can actually begin to see the end of huge military involvement.
Published by Jeff Musall
Jeff Musall has a passion for writing, a knack for frank and informed expression, and a desire to engage the minds of readers. He is an avid sports fan across the board and loves good competitions. His work... View profile
- The Truth About Those WMDs Supposedly Discovered in IraqSupporters of Bush are on a kick about how WMDs were found after all. The problem is these people only listened to Fox so they only got half the story.
Holiday Gift Ideas for Political JunkiesA holiday gift guide for people who are interested in politics and political history.
Ted Haggard Has Put the Last Nail in the CoffinCatholicism has emasculated its numbers by infesting our country with child molestors. Now, Southern Baptists alienate intelligent people with their futile war for the Intellige...- President Bush was Right: Weapons of Mass Destruction Found in IraqMany have said President Bush was lying when he said Iraq contained weapons of mass destruction, and America had to be made safe from them. A new government report proves he was right all along.
'Abstinence Only' Undermines the War on HIV/AIDSCongress should be applauded for allocating funds to fight the global HIV/AIDS pandemic. However, along with the funding, Congress needs to address some spending policies that a...
- Funnies in the Presidential Debate
- Third Presidential Debate Preview - Updated All Day
- John Cusack Tweets Hostility Against Fox News and GOP Leaders
- Onward, Rick Santorum: Pro-Crusade Candidate Staking His Position for Republican P...
- If Pennsylvania's Rick Santorum is "Conservative" We're in Trouble
- Santorum "Racial" Comment Nothing but a Calculated Distraction from What Ills the...
- Rick Santorum's Potential Candidacy for the 2008 Presidential Election




5 Comments
Post a CommentI saw this in passing; it IS too early for a debate!
"Was it because none of the candidates favored by Fox pundits were on the stage, or did Baier set out to actually be "Fair and Balanced?" Not if they value there job at FOX, me thinks.
All wrong, all the time: Santorum.
Santorum? Do you suppose he has a wind-up doll that just repeats the same old stuff, over and over?
I found this debate to be interesting -- and as interesting were the number of potential candidates who were not present, as well as the way Fox News ran the program with so many limitations set for journalists and photographers. I wonder if there will be more of this, or if it will open up more as 2012 campaigns heat up.