Five reasons bank nationalizations aren't the answer
1. Giving government access to bank capital is dangerous- Quite frankly most of us understand that whether they are a republican, democrat, or independent most of the politicians in Washington are most concerned about getting re-elected. Many economists and strategists believe that nationalization of banks would give far too many politicians the power to move the massive capital of the largest banking institutions in the world.
2. Why would the government know how to run a bank? I don't understand what makes anyone believe that the government could do a better job running the bank than longtime financial executives. The government clearly is not designed to be running corporations so it is confusing as to how they would be able to guide the bank back to being profitable.
3. Creates a slippery slope- Nationalization of anything creates a slippery slope. We don't want government in control of everything throughout the economy. This is an economy that is built on the principles of capitalism and private ownership as well as small businesses. The last thing we need is government running everything.
4. How would things be accounted for? If the nationalization did take place then how would the government account for the balance sheet of the banks and the earnings or losses of the banks. Taxpayers would certainly have the right to know exactly how the money was being spent.
5. Creates disadvantages for banks that have been well run- There are still banks in this country that have been managed very well and are in terrific financial shape right now. These banks would effectively be punished for having done the right things because they would then be in competition with the government.
Nationalization isn't a pretty option and these are just five of the reasons why.
Published by Aaron Smith - Featured Contributor in Sports
I am a full-time freelance writer who specializes in writing about the world of sports as well as the financial industry. I write about a little bit of everything. My passion for all of these topics comes ou... View profile
- Federal Government Begins Nationalization of American Banking SystemNationalization is still nationalization, no matter what euphemism the government uses.
- Chancellor Merkel Proposes New "Financial Market Constitution" to Ease Global Fina...Berlin, Germany - Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany, said in a meeting to address the global financial crisis that banks accepting a $680 million rescue offer need to give back something in return, say published re...
- Is the US Financial Bailout Package a First Step Towards Socialism?By now, every one in America has heard about the $700 billion great financial bailout. The benevolent US government has pumped in humongous amounts of cash into banks to save them from bankruptcy - largely brought abo...
- Nationalization of Banks?Discussion of US action on Banks and suggestions on maximum salaries.
- Election of 1956: Test of the Eisenhower Foreign Policy
- Is Government-Sponsored Free Medical Care the Solution to Current Medical Insuranc...
- The Functions and Mechanisms of the Protectorate
- Bear Stearns Buy-Out Elicits Anger & Understanding
- Government Bails Out Giant Insurer AIG with an $85 Billion Loan
- The Nationalization of the Investment Banking Industry
- Bush Nationalizes Banks; Republicans Call Obama Plumber Comments Socialism
- Nationalization may sound good on the surface, but it has several very big negatives
- What makes the government experts at running a bank?
- How would this be accounted for?



