Florida Oil Spill Media Blackout UPDATE:Some Scientists Break the Silence Warning of BP Disbursant

Maryann Tobin
There is now more evidence to support the suspicions of Tampa, Florida and other Gulf Coast residents, that BP's massive use of chemical dispersant on the Gulf oil spill is cause for concern.

Since the Deepwater Horizon exploded on April 20, 2010, BP has pumped nearly 2 million gallons of the chemical disbersant, Corexit into the Gulf of Mexico.

"Deep concern about negative impacts the dispersant/crude oil mix will have on both the marine ecosystem and human health has prompted leading ocean scientists to issue a consensus statement that urges a halt to any further dispersant use in the Gulf. The statement, authored by Dr. Susan Shaw, Director of the Marine Environmental Research Institute, stands on a large body of research indicating that crude oil and dispersants are more toxic when they are combined than either oil or dispersants alone," according to a CNBC report. "

BP as been trying to hide scientific evidence that could be used against them in litigation since the start of the oil spill disaster.

Just days after the explosion on the Deepwater Horizon rig, Professor Norm Guinasso of Texas A&M University was approached by BP with a contract to 'buy' his silence. The lucrative contract which prohibits scientists from publishing their findings on the BP oil spill was also offered to scientists at Louisiana State University, Alabama University, the University of Southern Mississippi, the University of Southern Alabama, and other independent researchers.

Scientists not muzzled by BP's stifling contract believe the worst impacts of the disaster are yet to come. Full public disclosure of all available oil spill data could provide critical information and a plan for action for what could otherwise be thousands of unexplained cases of disease, cancer, reproductive problems and other adverse health effects on marine life and humans.

BP's efforts to silence the scientific community adds credibility to the claims of marine biologists and other researchers. If there were nothing detrimental to hide, BP would not be attempting to control public access critical scientific data.

Related links
Whistle blower testifies on oil spill worst fear:BP deliberately sinks oil with Corexit as cover up

BP gives Gulf of Mexico Corexit overdose: Submerged oil more deadly than surface oil slick

Increasing reports of toxic oil rain on Gulf Coast and Tampa Florida

NOAA Gulf oil spill map shows deadly oil plume moving closer to St. Petersburg, Florida

Sea floor leak now confirmed may have been hidden by Gulf oil spill media blackout

Gulf of Mexico environmental damage may be permanent: NOAA video

North America faces years of toxic oil rain from BP oil spill chemical dispersants

Published by Maryann Tobin

Maryann Tobin is a professional journalist who recently appeared on the History channel in Brad Meltzer's DECODED: 2012. She has more than 3 million hits on the worldwide web, and also has more than 35 ye...  View profile

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.