In the United States, landowners often lease the mineral rights of their properties. One of the reasons to do this is to allow oil and natural gas companies to remove rich deposits of these natural resources to be refined for energy consumption.
In exchange to access to these reserves, oil and gas companies pay royalties to the landowners. The owners retain the mineral rights and receive handsome royalty incomes. Much of the land explored for natural resources is federally owned. This should mean that the American people are the landowners.
In these cases it is the United States department of the Interior who receives the royalties. Recently, several branches of the Interior Department have come under scrutiny for holding hands with the very companies with which they do business on behalf of the American people.
Beyond fraternizing with these oil and natural gas companies, it has been reported that employees have been accepting gifts, hotel accommodations, travel, and more from the oil and natural gas companies. Since many of these officials set the terms of the lease agreements, these presents could easily be seen as bribery. The term we used in the headline was "Lease for grease."
Congress has recently introduced legislation that would effectively end "Lease for grease."
The chairman of the House Energy and Natural Resources committee, Nick Rahall of West Virginia, wants to create a new federal agency that would consolidate energy programs and have oversight on the leasing of mineral rights along with enforcement and protection of the government's royalties.
The bill is supposed to address "Lease for grease" by requiring all involved employees be certified and forced to comply with rules of ethics and standards. Those found to be taking "grease" would lose their certification. The bill also empowers the agency to use necessary pressure on oil and gas companies to produce lease agreements quickly and the bill includes a process for improving royalty collections.
Some in Congress wonder if the creation of a new federal agency is really necessary. To them it would make more sense to pass most of the measures in this bill and apply them to the agencies currently responsible under the Department of the Interior.
If the bill passes, it will have no effect on private landowners who reach their own agreements with oil and gas companies.
Resources:
Federal Trade Commission - Oil and Gas Industry Initiatives
Committee on Natural Resources - Responsible Federal Oil and Gas Lease Act of 2008
Published by Warren Reed
- Oil, Gas Companies Recognized for Reducing EmissionsOil and natural gas companies have been recognized by the EPA for their work reducing methane emissions. The Natural Gas Star Program is a voluntary program and began in 1993.
- Why Investing in the Oil and Gas Industry Makes Sound Risk/Reward Sense!A short article with helpful information on why investing in the oil industry is a wise choice for your future.
- Why Oil and Gas Prices FluctuateThis is a research paper that explains why the price of oil and gasoline can fluctuate in such dramatic ways. The paper also shows how the prices of oil and gasoline are related to each other.
- World Demand for Crude Oil and Exploration TechniquesOPEC & Non-OPEC members co-ordinate supply and price for crude oil despite cheating. However, crude oil demand exceeds supply & subsequently price increases. Golden Zone & satellite imaging offer new oil exploration t...
Gas and Oil Producers Buy Mineral Rights in Santa Fe, New MexicoLocals of diverse political backgrounds get together when gas and oil producers become interested in drilling in Santa Fe, New Mexico.
- Jurisprudential Aspects of Oil and Gas Leases
- Oil and Gas Investing: How to Profit from High Oil Prices
- Market Trends Likely to Lead to Falling Oil and Gas Prices, Fed Says
- Russia, Energy, and the New Cold War
- Mineral Rights and Gas Boom Update for Tarrant County, Texas
- Mineral Rights and Gas Boom
- The History of the Louisiana Gulf Coast Oil Exhibit (LAGCOE): One of the Largest O...

