The USDA has said for years that the meat industry is was not required to place labels on their products but strongly encouraged the use of nutritional labels. Due to cost the providers of meat products have refrained from adding labels to their products. That will all change in 2012 when 40 of the most common cuts of meat will be required to have labels. These cuts will include everything from hamburger meat to pork chops.
However, some business will be exempt from needing a label. According to Food Safety News, business which produce less than 100,000 lbs of meat or poultry annually within a single facility will not be required to be labeled. The notice in the Federal Register regarding food labeling said,"FSIS believes an exemption for ground or chopped products produced by small businesses is necessary because the burden of mandatory nutrition labeling may force some small firms to stop producing the product because of the cost of nutrition labeling and eventually force some small firms out of business."
The USDA and the FDA have been under fire over nutritional labels and food items that are currently not labeled. The latest products that are currently on the table for the USDA and FDA to decide on labeling is genetically modified salmon or what has been dubbed as the frankenfish. Since there are currently no labeling requirements for fish, meat or poulty, the company who created the frankenfish had no reason to label it if it came to market. So far the fish has yet to be approved by the Food and Drug Administration.
It is possible that with the new label requirements for meat and poultry products in 2012 that we will see more nutritional labels on products that normally would not have them. Products like vegetables and fruits may be required to follow suit. Especially with the emergence of genetically modified foods. It would not be shocking for consumers to want to know exactly what they are putting into their bodies by requesting labeling on foods that have been processed, modified or engineered.
Published by Linda StCyr
Linda St.Cyr has been a featured contributor for Associated Content from Yahoo!, she is the author of several short stories including the story "Leaving" published in the anthology collection, Elements of Ti... View profile
- Food Allergies - the Good, the Bad, and the Genetically-ModifiedThis article provides both the positive and negative aspects of genetically-modified foods in regards to food allergies.
Organic Food Vs. Genetically Modified FoodThis article details the difference between organic food and genetically modified food.- The Case of Genetically Modified Mosquitoes in Malaysia: Spearheading Internationa...The IMR of Malaysia has applied for approval from the National Safety Board(NSB) to release at least 30,000 genetically modified mosquitoes into the wild at two targeted areas ie The State of Pahang and the UNESCO st...
- Apple and Cranberry Pork ChopsThis simple simple dish is a great way to prepare pork chops or turkey in fall or winter. It is the perfect flavor, and will make you look like a gourmet!
- Canadian Biotech Company Asks USDA to Approve Genetically Modified ApplesGenetically engineered foods are a reality. A Canadian biotech company is seeking approval from the USDA to sell genetically modified apples that don't brown in the US.
- How to Read Food Labels
- Understanding Food Labels
- Few People Are Getting Enough Calcium; Food Labels Are Difficult to Understand
- New Nutrition Labels: Good or Bad?
- What the Labels Mean on Organic, Natural and Free Range Meat
- Could New Nutrition Food Labels Make it Easier to Eat Healthy?
- The Facts Behind Dog Food Labels




2 Comments
Post a CommentGood report on a good development.
I suppose most folks won't read labels anyway, but maybe this just might make companies a bit more accountable and some consumers a bit more educated about their choices.