The author of the series, Marco Vicenzino, is a foreign affairs analyst who serves as a board member and strategic advisor to the Afghanistan World Foundation. He is Director of the Global Strategy Project in Washington, D.C., and John C. Whitehead Fellow of Foreign Policy.
Part I of the series begins by warning readers that Afghanistan's long-term prospects warrant more caution than optimism, and that this is likely to be the case for the foreseeable future. In examining the current situation in Afghanistan, which involves the presence of troops from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, or NATO, the author notes that a rising number of civilian casualties has served to undermine Afghan support for foreign forces and for the central government headed by President Karzai.
The first section of part one, under the sub-heading "Security and the Afghan Army," notes a surge of violence in Afghanistan last year that required additional international forces to deploy to the country. At the same time, the effectiveness of the Afghan has been improving, but the assistance of NATO will be required for a very long time.
The second section, titled "Understanding the Tribal Structure," states that a smaller international presence and an increased Afghan presence in the fight against the Taliban and Al-Qaeda remnants could yield results in tribal rural areas where outsiders are resented and where cultural misunderstandings can lead to violence. The author argues that a better understanding of Afghan tribes and clans is necessary, something he calls enhanced "network analysis."
Section three, called "The Political Landscape," says, "In principle, Afghans remain proud of having achieved a form of representative government that is still a work in progress." However, the author cautions, progress is likely to take time, occurring gradually and in small increments.
In conclusion, the author writes, an extended period of time will be required for Afghanistan's government and society to fully develop. He even goes as far as to say, "One must accept the possibility that it might not occur, or not to the extent accepted in the west."
Part I of the "Examining Afghanistan" Series is available for reading on the Foreign Policy Association web site.
Source: Foreign Policy Association Global Views Newsletter
Published by Greg Reeson
I am a Featured Writer for The New Media Journal and a The Veteran's Voice. I also regularly contribute to GOPUSA and The Land of the Free. View profile
- The Federalist Foreign Policy for America 1789-1800An analysis of the foreign policy of the early American government, run by Federalist Presidents George Washington and John Adams.
- Soviet Foreign Policy in Iran: 1945-1979Study of how Soviet foreign policy grew through economic cooperation with Iran from 1945-1979. Particular emphasis is shifted away from Cold War stances and upon nation to nation growth.
- Giuliani's Hawkish Foreign Policy TeamGiuliani's foreign policy team includes some prominent hawks.
- Summary of Morality and Foreign Policy by George KennanThis is a summary of the issues discussed in George Kennan's article "Morality and Foreign Policy".
- American Foreign Policy Punishes People for Participating in Democracy Yet AgainEven the Hamas was freely elected in within the Palestinian Authority, the West does not want it to govern the Palestinian people. American foreign policy has a history of paying lip service to democracy, but only wh...
- Foreign Policy Association Report Examines Afghanistan
- RAWA: The Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
- Foreign Policy is the Name of the Game at the First Presidential Debate of 2008
- Canadian Foreign Policy in the Post-Sept. 11 World
- Harry S Truman's Foreign Policy and its Affect on the Spread of Communism
- President Bush Criticized for Foreign Policy and Economy
- Ideology and U.S. Foreign Policy: An Analysis of the Book by Michael H. Hunt

1 Comments
Post a CommentThis is an excellent and well documented series. We have a duty and obligation to fight terrorism, the primary threat to our values' The entry into a war in Iraq is and was a distraction from that basic fight. We should have remained in Afghanistan, in force, to allow the Afghan government to be strong enough to survive tribal rivalries and Osama. Now we have chaos in Afghanistan and Pakistan, a restrengthening of Al Quaeda and the threats to the United States have not diminished!