And I wanted him to lose.
A loss by the Mets in the game would have meant a sweep, a 2-4 homestand and the end of the Willie Randolph era. Instead, the Mets won when a critical in-game decision by Randolph worked out. The game was tied 2-2 and the Mets had two runners in scoring position and Martinez due to hit. With the fans urging Randolph to let Martinez hit, Willie sent up a pinch-hitter, who delivered a two-run single. The bullpen turned in three scoreless innings and the Mets emerged with a 4-2 win.
Nobody is acquitting themselves well for the Mets right now. Certainly the players underperforming deserve the lion's share of the blame. But, as the old saying goes, you can't fire all of the players, so you fire the manager and hope a change will do the team good.
Randolph isn't doing himself any favors, either. His biggest plus has always been that the players respected him but that no longer seems to be the case. Sure, David Wright is saying all of the correct things, but is there any other player on the team that has Willie's back? Not Billy Wagner, who pops off without thinking of the ramifications of what he is saying. Not Carlos Delgado, who seems unmotivated to play anything but token defense. Not Carlos Beltran, who speaks volumes by saying nothing at all about how the franchise should commit to the manager.
And we still have all of the problems with Randolph from last year's collapse. Horrid bullpen management? Check. Woeful reserves to fill in for injured starters? Check. Burying Ramon Castro behind an inferior starting catcher? Check. Unflagging commitment to washed-up veterans over unproven rookies? Check. Inexplicable desire to stock bench with former second baseman? Check. Refusal to shake up underperforming squad with anything resembling fire? Check.
Now, I much prefer the Walter Alston style of management to the Billy Martin one. But at some point the players need someone to get in their face and explain the facts of life, especially when they are underperforming for the second year in a row.
And here's where Mets management gets in on the poor performance. Rumors are circulating that when Randolph gets fired, they are going to replace him with bench coach Jerry Manuel. Now, making no comments about the wisdom of replacing the guy you find unsatisfactory with the guy who is the one advising him on in-game decisions, why on earth would you replace the stoic, flaccid Willie Randolph with the stoic, flaccid Jerry Manuel? The team needs a rah-rah Tommy Lasorda type or a kick you in the teeth Larry Bowa type at the helm, not Randolph lite.
Now it's up for debate how much influence both Willie Randolph and general manager Omar Minaya have over the construction of the bench. Perhaps they both deserve blame for what can only be described as woefully inadequate reserves. It's one thing if the bench comes up short for unexpected circumstances. But when entirely predictable things happen and the team is unprepared, someone has to take the blame.
The Mets planned to have Moises Alou as their starting left fielder. Alou is a great hitter but he's also 41-years old. Since 2004, here are his games played by season: 155, 123, 98, 87. It does not take a rocket scientist to see a pattern here. A good team would have been prepared for Alou to miss significant time this season. The Mets have already played eight different players in left this season besides Alou. These range from the barely acceptable Endy Chavez to the downright deplorable Brady Clark and Fernando Tatis.
Last season, Carlos Delgado showed signs of falling off a cliff. Especially noticeable were his struggles against southpaws, who he managed just a .704 OPS despite a .324 BABIP. It should have been an easy fix to put someone on the bench who was a lefty masher who could handle playing first base once or twice a week. Not only was there no lefty masher on the bench, there was nobody whose prime role was backup first baseman.
Instead the club began the season with a five-man bench comprised of two backup outfielders (Endy Chavez and Brady Clark with fellow reserve Angel Pagan (two years in the Majors with a 76 and 87 OPS+) starting for Alou, who began the season on the DL), two second baseman (Marlon Anderson and Damion Easley) and a backup catcher (Raul Casanova, for the injured Ramon Castro).
None of the reserves could hit, there was no backup corner infielder or shortstop and the two nominal infielders were at-best below average with the glove. This is a bench one would expect from a team with the bottom payroll in the league, not one that ranks in the top five.
Like every other team, the Mets have had their share of injuries, which has given the club the chance to address the imbalance of the bench. Currently, 22 different hitters have graced the roster so far this season. So the bench must be straightened out now, right?
The Mets currently have two backup catchers, two second baseman and Fernando Tatis as their reserves. At least with Ramon Castro back from the DL, there's one legitimate Major League bat on the bench, since Brian Schneider and his .315 slugging percentage is the starting backstop.
If Randolph didn't make this bench, he should be complaining to Minaya every day about it. And he should be begging owner Fred Wilpon to take his calls to see what he could do if he got nowhere with his general manager.
The Mets have Val Pascucci at Triple-A waiting for a call to the Majors. Pascucci is batting .304 with a .414 on-base percentage and a .620 slugging percentage in 158 at-bats for New Orleans. Pascucci is a righty-hitting OF/1B and would fill the need for a complement to Delgado and a power bat off the bench. Instead the Mets have Fernando Tatis with his .292 OBP and .333 SLG mark in New York.
In Double-A, the Mets have lefty-hitting Mike Carp, who is batting .361 with a .427 OBP and a .555 SLG while in New York we have Marlon Anderson with his .194 OBP and .246 SLG mark.
I've highlighted the bench but I could just have easily focused on the bullpen, where Randolph still trots out Aaron Heilman in high leverage situations despite an ERA approaching six. Or about how the Mets neglected to address the bullpen in the off-season, even after last season's collapse, adding only the forgettable (and hittable) Matt Wise to the mix.
The Mets had the horses to challenge for a 95-win season in 2008 but are instead two games under .500 in the middle of June. The starters seems unmotivated, the bench is poorly constructed and the relievers are disappointing again.
It's time to fire Willie Randolph. Maybe Davey Johnson would come back if we begged.
Published by Brian Joura
Freelance writer for hire. References available upon request. View profile
- Ringtones with a Phony Ring to Them: Free Isn't Always Free
- Taking Time for Time to Come
- Free Vegas: Free Shows in Vegas
- Free Summer Time Activities
- Fall Means Daylight Saving Time Ends: Remember to Fall Back!
- How to Get Free & Almost Free Items Every Week
- Free Tips for Free or Almost Free Christmas Gifts and Christmas Decorating





12 Comments
Post a CommentYou called it, my friend! Glad the Mets listened to you.
I find it difficult to take Wagner's complaints seriously sometimes.
You're the reverse kingmaker, Brian!
Wow - if I had known I had this power, I would have written this article weeks ago!
It's long past due for Willie Randolph to be out of there.. good info with the stats on the guys in the minors.
I was wondering what happened to the Mets this season. I've been distracted by the Marlins and Braves hanging near the top of the NL East with Philadelphia and surely thought the Mets would be there as well. Few managers would be able to have great success given the lack of execution by the Mets' bullpen and bench this season.
thanks for the interesting read ..................
Good article, Brian. I was watching Baseball Tonight last week, and some stat came up showing that the White Sox had won seven straight games and averaged over eight runs since Ozzie Guillen spouted off to the media. John Kruk, whose opinion I normally respect, laughed it off saying it was ridiculous to assume that a manager showing emotion could trigger such a thing. I couldn't disagree with Kruk more. I always thought that a good manager could light a fire under a team when it needed it (and it certainly appears as thought the Mets need it!) or do whatever it took to get the best effort out of his players. Well documented examples are Piniella the day after the Zambrano-Barrett fracas and Leyland in 2006 following a "completely unacceptable" road trip in April. I won't pretend to know what happens behind closed doors, but there appears to be no sense of urgency with the Mets, and to me, that falls on the manager.
I think Randolph needs a new team, and a fresh start.
I agree with a lot of what you said as usual. Maybe it's just me but I think Willie wants the Mets to be like the Yankees when they should probably be more like the Red Sox. Nobody would dare to tell Manny Ramirez to be more serious because it would effect his offense. I don't know what happens in the locker room but I wouldn't be surprised if Willie wants Reyes to be more Jeter-like and that's had a negative effect on him. I mean we know that Willie doesn't like that free attitude, Lastings Milledge was in the doghouse from day one for simply getting excited. I'm not sure how many changes can be made in the season to fix all those problems you listed but if they brought in a rah-rah guy and got Reyes, Beltran and Delgado motivated and they started hitting then the offense would cover up a lot of other deficiencies enough to compete because the good news is that all the teams in the East have flaws.