One of the most distressing things about this issue, for me, is the fact that we've totally lost sight of why the seperation between church and state was so vital and important in the first place. Now, as a country, we're running roughshod over a very large and vital part of our fabric. These legislations should not touch marriage, and they should not consider God in the writing of a Bill. They do not have the exclusive copyright on what God wants of us, and it should have no bearing whatsoever on our laws.
It seems that the few issues of importance to this administration, that don't have to do with oil, are all about rewriting the Bible. How many times can one say this: If you're going to throw your bible at people, don't leave out the part where it says don't judge others, over and over again. Every single time this particular argument is brought up, without fail or exception, a conservative will ignore it and attack any other issue, but that one. Why is it so difficult for them to say, "Hey, yeah it does say that more than anything else, and yeah we ignore it because we just really want to make everyone the same, kind of like nazis-and the only way we can get away with that is to say that it's what God wants. We like to say God alot to make it sound credible, but it's really all about what we want, and we don't like diversity." I demand to know, people, why so many of you ignore that. I think the rest of us who are having to live under your rules are entitled to an answer as to why that is the only piece of your precious book that you seem to have license to dismiss. If you're so divinely correct, back it up. I have spoken to God, and he agrees with me. You should explain.
I fail to understand why it matters to our government who should be able to marry who. Marriage is an institution that society has used throughout history. It is not patented by governments, and it should not be overseen by governments. We now live in a country that can listen to our phone calls and blame it on terrorists, who can take our jobs and give them away but still say the economy is steady, who can let us lose our children's college funds to pay for gas so that they can make obscene profits, (and yes, there is a connection there, though many now quote oil executives to refute it), who can now tell us who God wants us to be committed to. We live in a country that has just made it acceptable to take away millions' civil rights. In the America I want to live in, if you love someone you should have the right to express your commitment in a public ceremony if you so choose. We are being lied to on a daily basis, and being fed brainwashing the likes of which we have not seen before.
What is happening with this issue, and many others, is occurring so slowly and steadily that many of us are simply asleep to it. When you have governments blatantly changing the laws to accomodate what they believe in, and to widen the gap between their financial level and others, that is no longer democracy-and what are we doing about it? Absolutely nothing. No democrat, no independent, no real American person, is doing anything about it. When we are passive our hands become bloody as well.
I certainly hope those of you who support this oppression and bigotry never find yourselves falling deeply in love with someone our new rules don't allow you to share your life with. Thousands of children, in foster care, that noone else wants, who gay couples lovingly adopt, won't be able to say their parents are married. We've doomed them to a life where their parents constantly have to excuse their hostile environment, and to try to instill in them tolerance, where tolerance cannot be found among their communities. This will bleed into all our cozy little lives, those of us who've never had to face oppression of some type, in ways we could not have imagined before.
This is not about whether Americans or American politicians believe homosexuality is moral. Some would say intolerance is more immoral than anything else. No group or individual holds the patent on morality. It is about protecting all of our rights.
It is not just a bill. It's a tragedy, and one that is being quietly dismissed by millions right now, so that we can move on to the next news story.
Published by Megan Smith
I'm a nomad now living back at home in Amarillo, Tx. I have a 12 year old daughter who keeps me busy as well as a successful career. My writing has taken me far considering it is still in its infancy. You c... View profile
- Iowa Supreme Court Unanimously Approves Gay MarriageIowa became the latest, and most unlikely, state to legalize gay marriage this morning. By a 7-0 decision, the state Supreme Court ruled that a gay marriage ban was unconstitutional, meaning Iowa gay couples can be ma...
- Iowa Supreme Court Sanctions Gay MarriageWithin the next 20 days or so, gay marriage will become legal in the state of Iowa. The Iowa Supreme Court unanimously decided that a 1998 law banning gay marriage is unconstitutional.
- The Gay Marriage BanPersonal opinion of a priest on gay marriage
Gay Marriage Ban Overturned in CaliforniaAccording to the ruling made by the California Supreme Court, same-sex marriage is now legal! This makes California the second state, after Massachusetts, where gay and lesbian...
- Reverse-Reversal on California Gay Marriage Ban Qualifies for November Ballot
- Iowa Supreme Court Lifts Gay Marriage Ban
- Thoughts and Opinions on California's Proposition 8 Gay Marriage Ban
- California Supreme Court Overturns Gay Marriage Ban
- Gay Marriage Ban Supported by California's Supreme Court
- Massachusetts Will Not Allow a Vote on Gay Marriage Ban
- Constitutional Divide: McCain and Palin Split Over Constitutional Amendment Bannin...
- The bill that will ban gay marriage, or rather define it as a union between a man and a woman, is go
- These legislations should not touch marriage, and they should not consider God in the writing of a B
- When we are passive our hands become bloody as well.

6 Comments
Post a Commenti agree that it isn't a God issue. Everyone just like to use God as an excuse for why they are banning something that is a personal choice. it isnt like homosexuals choose to be gay, they just are. and if God really didn't want gay people he wouldn't make them. To take this completely away from God and religion, our country was built on freedom, and the rights of marriage fall into that. Everyone who is against gay marriage should just keep it to themselves unless they are also willing to give up that right
THAT book's a modern American misunderstanding of an olde english mistranslation of a german vulgate mistranslation of a latin vulgate mistranslation of a greek mistranslation of an ancient phonoecian/aramaic/chaldean/yudaen/hebrew compilation of five seperate books and a bunch of personal notes and letters scribbled on clay. It has not much to directly do with modern life once you truly understand it. This understanding (belief's definition) is what killed Yashua.
Marriage is a public ceremony Grayson. And if we can F up marriage, why can't they? What are we so afraid of? We know it's a business issue for politicians, but what's your reason? Why do lines have to be drawn? Why do you NEED the government to decide for you what your 'morals' will be? Why do you need to be protected from married gay people? Or polygamists for that matter? And how do you know what it was like through history? You weren't there Grayson. You only know what you've been told. Thank you for your comment.
BTW: It's not a God issue. It's a legal issue. What if we made it so that gays could enjoy the legal benefits of marriage, while still not having their union recognized by God. Do you think that would make it all right? It would take care of the moral issue and leave it a human rights issue. But I guarantee people would be up in arms. This is about business not wanting to pay out benefits.
Grayson: Slavery has existed since people can remember. Should we legislate that back into the Constitution? That argument that "it's always been that way" is never a good one. Progress has only ever come by questioning why it's always been that way.
I really don't understand a few things that you said. Gay people aren't beeing banned from professing their love in a public ceremony; they just can't get married, which is a ceremony reserved for heterosexual couples. It has been like this since history can remember, so why shouldn't we be able to uphold the sanctity of such a tradition? I've got nothing against gay or lesbian couples; I just don't think that everyone should be allowed to get married. I feel the same about this as I do about polygamy. You can love more than one person, but should you be able to marry as many as you wish? Lines do have to be drawn; I don't see it as a God issue.