As a proponent of same-sex marriage, this news is particularly heartening, especially coming so quickly on the heels of the disappointing Proposition 8 passage, which amended the California constitution last November to ban gay marriage only six months after the California Supreme Court declared gay marriage to be a fundamental right within the state.
Gay marriage has been legal for years in Massachusetts and for a few months in Connecticut, and the Vermont legislature today finished voting on a bill legalizing it (which the Republican governor has threatened to veto), but this Iowa ruling confers a great deal of additional legitimacy on gay marriage.
For one thing, a unanimous supreme court ruling indicates that all seven justices are in agreement that banning gay marriage violates equal protection. While only a bare majority is needed for a court ruling to have the full effect of law, the unanimity of the court points to a clear legal consensus which makes it less likely that conservatives will end up claiming that a few "rogue judges" have hijacked the law on this issue.
The location of this ruling is also important. The states on the northern side of the eastern seaboard are generally considered to be liberal, but Iowa is a swing state. It has mostly leaned a little to the left for the past few elections, but it has voted 5 times Democratic and 5 times Republican in the last 10 presidential elections, and out of the 41 presidential elections in which Iowa has ever voted, only 12 of them were for Democratic candidates, according to the Iowa Presidential Election Voting History. It would be difficult to argue that Iowa is a radically liberal state which is completely out of sync with what some conservatives like to call the "real America."
Although people on both sides of this issue can become emotional and angry about it (myself included), the best approach to change is genuine communication, education, and personal experience with homosexuals. People on the right need to realize that those whom others choose to marry doesn't affect their lives or their marriages. There are some (too many) on the right who are nothing more than bigots, but they're in the minority. Most of the conservative opposition simply has a misguided understanding of what will happen to their lives when gay marriage is legalized (for the record, they'll hardly notice at all). Gay marriage has been legal in Massachusetts since 2004, and the sky has neither fallen nor been taken over by gay people. The lack of disastrous social change in Iowa after homosexuals begin wedding each other will likewise help those opposed to gay marriage see that it is not harmful.
More honesty on the part of people who are anti-gay marriage would greatly help facilitate a productive dialogue on this issue. Indeed, the really frustrating thing is the irrational and unconsidered arguments people against gay marriage try to use to support their position. It would be much more straightforward if they simply said something like "You know what? Gay marriage just makes me a little uncomfortable; it seems wrong to me," instead of struggling to come up with "logical" reasons for them to hide behind. (For a rebuttal of the most common arguments against gay marriage, please see my article Keep Gay Marriage Legal).
Sooner or later, gay marriage will be recognized nationwide as a legitimate form of marriage, just as interracial marriages eventually were. The more people opposed to it see that it doesn't do any harm, the faster they will realize that they are getting in the way of the happiness of others for no reason. The ruling from Iowa today will soon help many on the wrong side of this issue to see the light.
Sources:
The Associated Press, "Iowa High Court Legalizes Gay Marriage in State" The New York Times.
Iowa Presidential Election Voting History. 270towin.com.
Published by Drew Moore
- Massachusetts Will Not Allow a Vote on Gay Marriage BanIn a stunning victory for gay marriage advocates, the Massachusetts Legislature voted to block the citizens of Massachusetts from having a vote on a proposed amendment to the state constitution that would have ended g...
- Functionalist and Conflict Theorist Views of Social ChangeThe concept of social change is something that all types of sociological theorists try to grapple with. Yet, not every sociologist can always agree with another about the causes and results of social change.
- California Gay Marriage Issue + McCain, Clinton, Obama?Check here to see my views about the California Gay Marriage decision as it might relate to McCain, Clinton, and Obama.
- Reverse-Reversal on California Gay Marriage Ban Qualifies for November BallotThe reversal to the gay marriage ban in California was overturned by the California Supreme Court on May 15th, 2008. Already, it is in trouble.
Constitutional Divide: McCain and Palin Split Over Constitutional Amendm...Sarah Palin is supporting a national ban on gay marriage. She told the Christian Broadcasting Network (CBN) that she supported a Constitutional amendment that would ban same-sex...
- DUI Laws of Iowa
- Global Warming Problem Solved; Gay Marriage to Blame
- Gay Marriage and Why This Christian Supports it
- 6 Arguments Against Gay Marriage that Don't Work
- Gay Marriage: Right or Wrong?
- Rudolph Giuliani: To Support Gay Marriage or Not to Support Gay Marriage?
- Issues in the Iowa Supreme Court: Jetseta Gage May Have Her Day in Court

