Civil lawyers have debated about the ban on same sex marriage that was passed on last November elections. This is because passing such a ban has violated the constitution of the state and the minority rights should not be easily influenced by the vote of the majority. This debate occurred last March, which is a month prior to the decision of the Supreme Court of California.
One year ago, the California Supreme Court has legalized same sex marriage which resulted to eighteen thousand same sex marriages. However, six months later, Californians begun to question these marriages and voted that the state constitution be modified and that marriage should be defined as the union between a man and a woman.
There have been divided views to this issue, as those who are against the same sex marriage were satisfied with the decision of the Supreme Court while those who support same sex marriage felt that right were deprived. Same sex marriage supporters claimed that the banning of same sex marriage takes away the rights of these people to be treated with equal respect and dignity.
Despite this chaos, the Supreme Court of California have informed the people that this amendment is not retroactive, which means that those who got married when in the time when same sex marriage was still legal in California will still be considered valid. Not unless, voters who have voted for the amendment intended it to be a retroactive one; however, it is not the case with Proposition 8. In addition, the court said that it would be too much to make Proposition 8 retroactive and invalidate the same sex marriages that occurred. Doing so will not only bring too much commotion but also mistrust to the state's law by the people.
Advocates of gay rights blamed the Supreme Court for not protect the rights of the minority group from the votes of the majority. The decision of the Supreme Court of California has caused a lot of activist to protest in front of the San Francisco courthouse carrying rainbow flags and signs. This decision of the Supreme Court is truly something that should be pondered upon not only by the affected parties but also by the entire population of the state of California as it involves right to equality.
Source: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090526/ap_on_re_us/us_gay_marriage
Published by Anonymous
6 Arguments Against Gay Marriage that Don't WorkMany social conservatives oppose homosexuals' rights to gay marriage. Here are the reasons they give, as well as some easy logic that debunks those reasons.- The Supreme Court and FederalismThis article looks at Federalism and the commerce clause in relation to the supreme court citing three major cases.
Can a Psychic Be Gay and a Christian Prophet at the Same Time?We are seeing more and more ministers admitting that they are gay. Does this mean that we have gay prophets as well? Can you be a gay prophet? Will we see more gay prophets i...
As Gay as it Gets: Top Gay Bars in South BeachIt's good to be gay in South Beach. This beautiful city-by-the ocean is a hot spot for the best gay bars and nightclubs in southern Florida.- ACLU Supports High School Gay Tolerance ClubIn a 12-page ruling, a Florida District Court Judge allows an injunction for a Gay-Straight Alliance club at a local Florida high school to meet and the lawsuit will proceed.
- A Look at California's Proposition 8: The 'Eliminates Right of Same Sex Couples to...
- Supreme Court Attorney Adresses Hot Button Issue
- Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Late Term Abortion
- Politics in the Supreme Court
- California's Prop. 8 - a Simple Constitutional Issue Impacted by Complex Emotions
- The Precedent Set by the California Supreme Court on Marriage
- Gay Marriage: Right or Wrong?
- Supreme Court makes ruling regarding gay marriage.



