The United States is falling behind in scientific research and competitiveness in scientific research results as China and India jump ahead in numbers of productive scientists. According to Mary Ann Liebert, owner of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., which publishes the peer-reviewed journal DNA and Cell Biology, the scientific gap could be bridged by women in the U.S who are already qualified scientists but who are passed over because of child-bearing and family responsibilities.
Liebert wrote the report with co-authors Jo Handelsman, Ph.D., who is a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and Editor-in-Chief of DNA and Cell Biology as well as President of the Rosalind Franklin Society, and Robert Birgeneau, Ph.D., who is Chancellor of the prestigious University of California at Berkeley. They said that an immediate and obvious solution to the failing of American scientific output would be to take advantage of the many women Ph.D.s and advance them to the tenured professorship positions that they have been passed over for in favor of their male colleagues.
In accord with a National Academy report entitled "Beyond Bias and Barriers," Liebert, Handelsman and Birgeneau also contend that the current hierarchical system in academia limits women scientists and poses a barrier to not only their advance but to the advancement of scientific productivity. They suggest that "a few significant changes in the academic system" could balance the gender inequality in academic institutions and allow for more of the highly qualified women scientists who already hold doctoral degrees to take positions of leadership.
In line with that spirit, the Rosalind Franklin Society, founded by Mary Ann Liebert in 2007, offers women in the biomedical fields of science opportunities to advance through advocacy programs, mentoring opportunities and educational grants. Rosalind Franklin is credited with having pioneered the world-changing discovery of DNA's structure.
"Beyond Bias and Barriers" attributes the gender inequalities in academia to both an "unconscious bias" against women in academia and science and the "archaic university structure" of achievement and advancement. The authors of the new report support the National Academy's recommendation that the "insidious role" of the underlying unconscious bias at work in academia be seriously addressed and eliminated from decision making policies and procedures.
Liebert, Handelsman and Birgeneau suggest relatively simple measures would do much to remove the gender inequalities and bring American science back to the forefront in terms of prestige and productiveness: add accessible quality day-care; extend the university tenure time clock; and allow for job-sharing. These measures would up-date what they call the archaic university system and would eliminate some of the reasons behind the unconscious bias against women scientists.
"Too Few Women Scientists Achieving Academic Leadership Positions, According to Editorial in DNA and Cell Biology," Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., Publishers.
Published by Kareyth Patrick
An insignificant essayist and poet breaking open the shell in travel writing and "green" ecological information and the occasional poem. View profile
- The Dangers of Censorship in Scientific Research (And How to Expose It) If you know of specific instances of censorship in scientific research, then you know the consequences can be infinite. But what can you do to stop this from happening? Read on to find out.
- Why You Can't Trust Scientific Research A personal experience into the world of scientific research.
- Five Topics for Educational Research Here are five topics for research in education. The perfect gift for the college student wondering what to select as a topic, or the educational professional seeking to enlighten us with a breakthrough or two.
- Does Education Induced Fear Contribute to a Lack of Scientific Progress? Article explores the effects of the American education system on scientific research.
- Is Sham Surgery Ethically Acceptable in Clinical Research? This particular essay was written for an interdisciplinary biology course. It discusses the medical ethics of using double blind (as in new drugs) research studies in order to research new surgical techniques.
- NIH: Women Avoid Scientific Research Because of Family, Self-Confidence
- The Differences Between Scientific Research and a Criminal Investigation
- Alternative Cancer Remedies - Find Scientific Proof of Possible Cures
- Animal Testing Has No Place in a Modern Scientific Community
- Why Socio-Cultural Anthropology Can Still Be Scientific
- Global Warming, 'Established Scientific Fact' & Jacques Chirac
- Top Secrets of the Scientific Method
|
|
- 10 things you need to know today: February 11, 2012 (The Week)
- Grammy Awards preview: Top 5 reasons to watch (The Week)
- No Fun Allowed: L.A. Beaches Ban Footballs, Frisbees, and Sand Digging (ContributorNetwork)
- Good day, bad day: February 10, 2012 (The Week)
- Obama's birth control compromise: 'Still unacceptable'? (The Week)