Like nuclear plantation, genetic engineering has its good and bad. To begin with its good side: there is more variety in gene combinations. Natural sexual reproduction limits the variety of gene combinations. Genetic technology along with the nanotechnology is said to solve many of the world's problems. For example, researchers have tried to develop super-antibiotics, designer virus or hunters that will only attack certain diseases like cancer, grass that will only grow 2 inches so it would never need to be mowed, food that can be grown in any climate and so on. Moreover, nanotechnology scientists have even declared that in future, computers will be smaller, faster and much more efficient. Machines will be devised which would even assist in operations. Imagine a robot performing a painless operation for you, doing your household work for you and all without pay. It is also claimed that genetic engineering will help in producing new therapies - test tube synthesis of genes for insulin, vaccines against some tropical and viral diseases etc.
Another area for which genetic engineering holds promise is agriculture. Two methods through which crop productivity can be improved have been researched by biologists. One is improving the plant breeds and the other is utilizing nitrogen from the atmosphere to improve the efficiency of crop plants.
But on the other hand, through a religious point of view do we really have the right to modify life? Religious leaders have argued that life is the invention of God and humans should not intervene in the God's procession and label life as their own make. The advantages of genetic engineering can be misused. Techniques of genetic manipulation can be used to create biological warfare or improve existing ones. Moreover, the organisms made through genetic engineering to clean oil spills or toxic wastes, if released in the environment will wreak havoc and will be disastrous to human life.
The gains of this amazing technology are manifold but their true value will depend upon how we adapt our social and economic institutions to ensure that the gains go to the developing nations and not to the multinational corporations.
Published by Aiman
Love to write,speak out and rock without limits !!! Love the freedom here to express my views. View profile
- Nuclear Power: Safe for the Environment?There are many controversies about whether nuclear power is really safe for the environment or not. First look will be at the alternatives in America's power supplies: coal, natural gas, and oil. They are not environm...
Nuclear Power Will Save the EnvironmentWith the dangers of global warming looming, environmentalists say that we need a new, cleaner source of energy. But we already have that, and it is called nuclear power.- Monsanto's Genetic Role: What About Genetic Engineering?A critique of an article about genetic engineering (2003)
- Are New Nuclear Power Plants a Good Idea?As humans, we seem to easily forget the past, nuclear power plants are an example. Looking at the past can help us see the future.
- Nuclear Power Plants in the Southeastern United States May Need to Shut Down24 of the nation's 104 nuclear power plants are located in the areas currently experiencing the most severe drought levels. What are the implications for consumers?
- Developing Nuclear Power as Alternative Energy
- Relative Dangers of Nuclear Power
- Why Nuclear Power Plants Are Not a Threat in America
- Nuclear Power in America
- Are the Nuclear Power Plants in Your Area Vulnerable?
- Nuclear Power and Our Energy Independence
- Perry Nuclear Power Plant in Ohio Re-Opens After Outage



