In earlier lessons we found the deflection (equation and maximum value) for a beam fixed at both ends and subject to a triangular load from one end to the other. We used the method of Integration (here), and Superposition (here). We solved for a particular case (beam length 10 ft, distributed load varying from zero to a maximum of 500 plf, and EI = 81,000,000 psi). Suppose now we want a general (generic) solution for the same essential problem (any beam fixed at both ends with triangular load). There are two ways we can go about getting such a solution. One would be to re-do any of our solutions from before, using `variables' instead of specific values. (Actually, solving in terms of `variables' is how we did the Superposition example.) The other, which I like, since it derives from what we have already done, is to take our specific solution and make it generic. I have already illustrated this for the case of a `simple' beam with triangular load (here). But I wanna do it again, here, for a couple reasons. First, because it's fun, and, second, I want to also illustrate getting the Reaction, Shear, and Moment values. Recall that in our simple beams the Reactions, Shears, and Moments can be determined by Statics (and so in the present sense are less interesting). Let's do it.
Deflection Equation and Maximum
From before (here or here) our deflection equation is ...
v(x) = ( - 0.4167 x5 + 125 x3 - 833 x2 ) / EI ... units of lb-ft3.
I guess in some sense this is partly generic in that we left it in terms of EI.
We then went on to find the maximum deflection of ... Δ = 6542 lb-ft3 / EI ... at x = 5.25 ft.
And, dumping EI = 81,000,000 lb-in.2 in ... we get (got) ... 0.14 in. (0.1396 in.).
Generic Expression for Maximum Deflection
Now let's make this generic (following our other example, here) ...
Δ = C wo L4 / EI ...
C = Δ EI / wo L4 = 0.1396 in. (81,000,000 lb-in.2) / [(500/12 lb/in.)(120 in.)4] =
C = 0.00131 ...
So,
Δ = 0.00131 wo L4 / EI ... cool!
Generic Expressions for Reactions, Shears, and Moments
Back to our solution by Integration we had for our Shear ...
V(x) = - 25 x2 + C1 ... and then we found C1 = 750.
So,
V(x) = - 25 x2 + 750.
We dump in x = 0 and we get V = 750 lb at the left end.
We dump in x = 10 and we get V = -1750 lb at the right end.
Making them `generic' ...
V(x=0)/(wo L) = 750 lb / [(500 lb/ft)(10 ft)] = 0.15 ...
So, V left end = 0.15 wo L ...
Similarly,
Vright end = - 0.35 wo L.
From what we know about Shear and Moment Diagrams ... our Reactions are ...
R left end = 0.15 wo L ... and ...
R right end = 0.35 wo L.
Here it would be fun to do a force equilibrium check.
The whole downward load is ½ wo L ...
Σ Fy = 0 ???
Let's see ...
0.15 wo L - 0.5 wo L + 0.35 wo L = 0? ... YES!
Moments ...
Our Moment equation is (was) ...
M(x) = -8.33 x3 + C1 x + C2.
C1 we have already said we found to be 750 ... and also in that solution we found C2 ... C2= -1667.
M(x) = -8.33 x3 + 750 x - 1667.
M left end (we found to be) = - 1667 lb-ft.
M right end ... - 2500 lb-ft.
And we also found a maximum positive moment of 1070 lb-ft at about x = 5.5 ft.
And now let's make these generic ... (Dimensional Analysis ... ha, ha! ... you'll get the hang of it!)
M left end / (wo L2) = - 1667 lb-ft / [(500 lb/ft)(10 ft)2] = - 0.0333 ...
So,
M left end = - 0.0333 wo L2.
M right end = (2500/1667) (-0.0333) (wo L2) = - 0.050 wo L2.
And, similarly ...
M max pos = + 0.0214 wo L2.
Let's finally get our deflection equation (curved shape) completely generic ...
v(x) = ( - 0.4167 x5 + 125 x3 - 833 x2 ) / EI ... = `C' wo L4 / EI ...
`C' = [ ( - 0.4167 x5 + 125 x3 - 833 x2 ) / EI ] / ( wo L4 / EI ) ... where I put the C in single quotes because it is not necessarily (or necessarily not) equal to any previous C's ...
`C' = [ - 0.4167 (x/L)5 L5 + 125 (x/L)3 L3 - 833 (x/L)2 L2 ] / ( wo L4 ) ... where see how I am multiplying and dividing by L to get the distance term dimensionless ...
`C' = [- 0.4167 (x/L)5 L5 + 125 (x/L)3 L3 - 833 (x/L)2 L2 ] / ( wo L4 ) = ...
... = - 0.4167 (100,000) (x/L)5 + 125 (1000) (x/L)3 - 833(100)(x/L)2 ] / [(500)(10,000)] ...
Fierce!!!
... = - 0.00833 (x/L)5 + 0.025 (x/L)3 - 0.0167 (x/L)2
So,
... v(x) = [ - 0.00833 (x/L)5 + 0.025 (x/L)3 - 0.0167 (x/L)2 ] wo L4 / EI.
Absolutely CRAZY!!!
Obviously, let's check.
Let's dump in x = 5 ft ... so x/L = 0.50 ...
... v(x=5) = - 0.139 in. ...
That's what we got last semester ...
YE-HAH!!!
Summary
Total load ...
R = W = ½ wo L
Reactions ...
R left = 0.15 wo L
R right = 0.35 wo L
Shears
V left end = R left = 0.15 wo L
V right end = - R right = - 0.35 wo L ... and is the Maximum absolute value Shear, (-) V max
Moment
M left end = - 0.0333 wo L2 ... negative ... or `tension on top'
M right end = - 0.050 wo L2 ... negative ... and also the maximum absolute value Moment, (-) M max.
And, ...
M max pos = + 0.0214 wo L2.
And, ...
... v(x) = [ - 0.00833 (x/L)5 + 0.025 (x/L)3 - 0.0167 (x/L)2 ] wo L4 / EI ...
And,
Δ = 0.00131 wo L4 / EI ... or ... Δ / L = 0.00131 wo L3 / EI
Concluding Remark(s)
So, we could use these for any beam subject to the same end and loading conditions (with constant EI). Maybe these should be published in a book. Maybe they already ARE!
References
Deflections of Beams by Integration: Statically Indeterminate Beams, Jeff Filler, Associated Content.
Solution of a Statically Indeterminate Beam by Superposition, Jeff Filler, Associated Content.
Generic Results of Solving for the Deflection of a Statically Determinate Beam, Jeff Filler, Associated Content.
Published by Jeff Filler
Consulting Engineer, Educator, Aspiring Writer and Photographer, Husband, Father, and Serious Hunter. View profile
- Frigidaire Affinity 3.5 Cu. Ft. Front Load Washer, Model: ATF6000F ReviewThe Frigidaire Affinity 3.5 Cu. Ft. Front Load Washing Machine, Model: ATF6000F is one of the best front load machines on the market because it integrates the stability of a traditional Frigidaire washer with the high...
- Appliance Review: Frigidaire Affinity 3.5 Cu. Ft. Front Load Washer, Model: ATF6700FThe Frigidaire Affinity 3.5 Cu. Ft. Front Load Washing Machine, Model: ATF6700F is an upgraded model from the already established Affinity product line.
- Whirlpool 3.2 Cu. Ft. Top Load Washing Machine Review If you are searching for a washing machine that will last you and your family many years, than I suggest taking a look at the Whirlpool 3.2 Cu. Ft. Top Load Washing Machine, Model: WTW5700S.
- Whirlpool Cabrio 6400 Series 4.5 Cu. Ft. Top Load Washer, Model: WTW6400SWThe Whirlpool Cabrio 4.5 Cu. Ft. Ultra-Capacity Top Load Washer, Model: WTW6400SW has all of the features that you will need to wash your clothes in a professional manner, and with advanced technologies your clothes h...
- Whirlpool 2.1 Cu. Ft. Top Load Washing Machine ReviewThe Whirlpool 2.1 Cu. Ft. Top Load Washing Machine, Model: LCD4332P comes from one of the most trusted brands in the appliance industry, and it has been outfitted with features that are user-friendly and actually usable.
- Solution of a Statically Indeterminate Beam by Superposition
- Beam Deflections by Integration: Statically Indeterminate Beam with One End Displa...
- Beam Deflections by Method of Integration: Statically Indeterminate Beams
- A Look at the Nazi Final Solution in Europe
- Deflections of an Uncracked Reinforced Concrete Beam
- Example Solutions of Indeterminate Beams Using Superposition
- Amana 3.34 Cu. Ft. Front Load Washing Machine Review




