It is for such seekers that I write this article.
Should you happen to visit the Answers in Genesis site you will find, among other things the following comment,
"... We return to the question which forms the title of this article. Should Genesis be taken literally?
Answer: If we apply the normal principles of biblical exegesis (ignoring pressure to make the text conform to the evolutionary prejudices of our age), it is overwhelmingly obvious that Genesis was meant to be taken in a straightforward, obvious sense as an authentic, literal, historical record of what actually happened..."
But are they right?
Modern science shows that the earth is billions of years in age, it comes to this conclusion in a number of ways and I recommend the following site for information even a non-scientist can understand, http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-age-of-earth.html .
Is there then a meeting place between science and the Book of Genesis? Yes, there is and it comes from the understanding that Genesis is not a science text-book, that it was written in order to understand, not HOW the world came to be but WHY.
Genesis 1 & 2 are parables, they are parables about why there is an earth, why humans and animals and plants share it in common and why there is pain and suffering in the world. Parables are stories which may or may not be literally true but which imparts to us an important spiritual truth. In the New Testament we have parables such as the Good Samaritan, the evil vine-dressers; the parable of the prodigal son.
None of these New Testament stories are literal fact but they are true in a deeper, more meaningful way. So it is with the parables of Genesis 1 & 2. In them we are not being told that the world was created in six days, six thousand years ago. We are, however, being told that the world was created by God's intention, that human beings are made in the image and likeness of God and that God is a close to us as a friend who walks and talks with us in the cool of the day.
Adam and Eve, the Fall, the Serpent, Noah and his Ark may or may not be literal truth but they are markers of ultimate truth, of truth which can be held only in the imagination, of truth which can only be shown in images and symbols.
Genesis can only be understood in that it is our story, each of us is Adam, each of us is Eve, we misunderstand the Genesis parables when we fail to realize that they are addressed to US as individuals. Genesis, then, is our unique, individual story told as parable it is not some pre-scientific attempt to explain how all things came to be but rather a profound series of meditations on why things should be in the first place.
Once we realize this, we can see there are no contradictions, can be no contradictions between the findings of science and God's word to us in Genesis. Let us happily give up our insistence on a literal Genesis and seek the deeper, religious truths that await us there.
Published by Ray McIntyre
Ray McIntyre is a priest in the Anglican Church International. He is married with three Children and lives in what he calls " A state of near insanity in Deepest, Darkest, New Zealand." View profile
- Creation Vs. Evolution: 150 Years and Still Not AcceptedAs we celebrate the bicentennial of the birth of Charles Darwin, and the 150th anniversary of his Origin of Species, the public still largely believes in the creation of man by a divine act of God.
- Creation VS. Evolution: Doubting TheoriesResearch on the belief of creation and theory of evolution
- Creation Vs. Evolution: Can They Co-Exist?Essay outlining the similarities between the Theory of Evolution and the Christian view of Creationism.
- When God was a Woman by Merlin StoneAn analysis of the book When God Was a Woman by Merlin Stone
Disneyland ws. Walt Disney WorldDisney is famous for its vacation resorts, but with two on opposite coasts of the United States, which was is better? This article places every aspect of the parks in competiti...
- Explanation of the Parables of Jesus: Parable of the Wheat and Tares
- Explanation of the Parables of Jesus: the Parable of the Fishing Net
- Explanation of the Parables of Jesus: Parable of the Sower
- Explanation of the Parables of Jesus: Parable of the Yeast
- Explanation of the Parables of Jesus: Parable of the Pearl
- Explanation of the Parables of Jesus: Parable of the Hidden Treasure
- George W. Bush: Bible Not Literally True
- I reccomend Alan Richardson's: Genesis: I-XI, SCM Press, 1953.
- How is Genesis our story?
- How should we approach Evolution?
- Why does the author argue that Genesis 1 & 2 are parables

3 Comments
Post a Commentthe Bible says we know by faith that God created the world form that which is not seen. Heb 11:3 It follows then that the origins are unexplainable by science. Solomon said so too. Science cannot explain miracles or faith.
I agree completely. I've posted my own discussion on this subject. It is possible to understand Genesis as a symbolic representation of evolving creation that is entirely consistent with contemporary scientific understanding. Given that the Genesis tale emerged during a pre-scientific age, the narrative is really remarkable.
http://drx.typepad.com/psychotherapyblog/2006/10/the_genesis_acc_1.html
Genesis does not support creationism . . . and science does not support macroevolution. Both are unproven (and unprovable?) philosophies. The Institute for Creation Research (www.icr.org) is a far better source for the science of creation. They dish out their fair share of dogma, but the genuine scientists crank out even more hard science. Genuine seekers ready to change their opinions based on better information will be amazed at what these folks do!