Currently, it is the hope that a new democratic run congress will seek to put an end to the war. It will be a hard fought battle within our political institution, but in the end the proposal by Bush to send in 20,000 more troops will be accepted. The reason for this is purely political. If a democratic congress were to deny Bush's proposal, then failure in the Gulf War would be squarely upon the shoulders of the Democratic Party.
It brings to question why, or how, did previous resolutions become disregarded. In May 2003, Bush declared an end to the Iraq War. In October 2003, the UN passed a resolution to transfer power to the new Iraqi government. Aid was offered by the UN through U.S. troops already on the ground. Due to an increase in guerilla warfare, US soldiers were once again in an active battleground. The end of the war is now 4 years past and the White House is requesting more troops to be sent in. Bush is caught, he cannot stop himself because American pride and sentiment is the only way to regain his credibility.
Many people have asked why troops have not been withdrawn from Iraq. The answer given is that to withdraw from Iraq will show fear to the enemy. Many of the nations still left within the "coalition of the willing" have been steadily withdrawing their troops since 2004. The U.S. is the only country whose leadership is calling for more troops to be sent in to Iraq. It would be fair to say that the fear of showing fear is represented by the White House. This furthers the idea that George Bush is entangled in his own web.
Time after time, the edicts and accusations given by this president have shown to be false or misguided. The war started with the intention of relieving Iraq of it's "weapons of mass destruction". Weapons, that this country provided them. Upon not finding weapons of mass destruction, it became a call to end terrorism. Then it became the duty of America and it's citizens to free Iraq and bring forth democracy. Now, despite the growing death count, the president finds himself unable to begin a withdrawal. For him, doing so would discredit everything that he has done. Bush believed that in winning the war in Iraq, his credibility would be high enough to elude any accusations of impropriety, of wrong doing. Now, to withdraw would be to admit defeat, admit that he was wrong.
It has become clear that democracy is a contradiction. President Bush has ignored and disregarded the American sentiment that once so strongly supported him. That sentiment now asks for troop withdrawals. That sentiment asks for an end to the war. That sentiment asks Bush to save the lives of American soldiers. In response, Bush is requesting 20,000 more troops to deploy to Iraq.
The contradiction if further shown in the US support of an Iraqi democratic government. With UN resolutions accepting and acknowledging the new Iraqi government, it should be clear that a governing body is now in place that will rule as the people request. Democratic elections are votes by the people, for the people. Iraq has thus far mirrored the Bush's contradiction by ignoring it's people's request for withdrawal of U.S. troops. 80% of Iraq's citizens are in favor of full withdrawal. Most of them understand the hardships they would endure, but offer the suggestion that they are enduring a lot more with the current situation.
So, the lone ranger continues on his path. Seeing destruction ahead, but too prideful to avoid it. This is no longer a war of good versus evil. This is no longer a global war. This is a one man war of right and wrong. George Bush will do what it takes to be right and save his credibility.
Published by Greg Wendland
Born in Michigan, Greg has lived in several states and abroad. He is a self-proclaimed 'Student of Human Nature'. He enjoys working as a Freelance Writer as well as owning and operating a computer repair bu... View profile
The Bush Cult and Their Weapons of Mass DestructionThe Bush loyalists refusal to believe what the rest of the world, including Bush, can see as fact, would appear to rank these folks as one of the most dedicated of cults. Let's...
Nuclear Weapons May Already Be Obsolete-- New Space Based Weapons of Ma...Forget the international offensive Treaty to Keep offensive weapons out of space. Space is the place for the ultimate in new simple gravity assist kinetic energy weapons that h...- France and Britain's Submarines Collide Carrying Weapons of Mass DestructionHow could this happen in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean and what if they had been going faster?
President Bush, Weapons of Mass Destruction and ImpeachmentThe Republicans hated Bill Clinton so much that they took him through an impeachment process over sexual misconduct. With all that has come to pass regarding WMD in Iraq, a far...- Bush's Lies: the Real Weapons of Mass DestructionPresident Bush's administration lied to a nation and global community to justify a genocide in Iraq.
- President Bush was Right: Weapons of Mass Destruction Found in Iraq
- Social Security Reform - President Bush: Redistribute If You Want to Privatize!
- President Bush Honors George Washington
- Personal Stories About President Bush
- Transformational Leadership Times 1.29: Weapons of Mass Destruction
- How Did the Use of Weapons of Mass Destruction Violate the People of Hiroshima's H...
- The History of Weapons of Mass Destruction

1 Comments
Post a CommentHe has a long way to go to retain any..lol