Global Economics

Mayer Amstel Rothschild was quoted as saying, "Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws." This not only speaks strongly of national economics, but global economics as well.
http://www.xat.org/xat/moneyhistory.html

John F. Hylan, then mayor of New York, said in 1911 that "the real menace of our republic is the invisible government which, like a giant octopus, sprawls its slimy length over our city, state and nation. At the head is a small group of banking houses, generally referred to as 'international bankers.'"
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/slavery.htm

The remainder of this article is based on the opinion and speculation drawn from historic knowledge of the author, based on factual news items and the economic trends both here in America and globally.

Put in more lay terms and what this means to us, imagine if you had enough money to loan money to a nation and printing its money, and if in loaning you not only had control of the amount in question, but also control of the interest rates. Add to this, the powerful influence you would have on the entire economic structure of the nation, and when it comes to making the laws including laws pertaining to the national economic well being including foreign trade, you would have more influence in the creation of these laws than any other individual or governing body. The nation would be to a certain degree, hostage to your plans and influence. The world banks of today are exactly this way, Mr. Rothschild was not alone in this endeavor nor was his mindset. Over the past 150 years men have become rich and powerful enough to not only manipulate one nations economy, but several, to the point of financing two nations in a war against each other, and today the control structure is pointed at global economics.

Today's global economics are hinged on the American economy and the American economy is controlled nearly completely by key banks. Over the past 20 years we have seen a systematic destruction of the economic safeguards of our economy here in America. One of which is the import/export taxes which protected American jobs and American industry by preventing foreign companies from undermining American products through cheaper labor and more lenient business laws. Thanks to the combined efforts of both George Bush Sr AND Bill Clinton, NAFTA became the first big chunk out of the foundation of our economic security policies. The fact that both parties with supposedly opposing viewpoints on many issues were fighting on the same side of the fence on NAFTA without significant conflict from the House or Senate. Unless you understand the National manipulation of its economy, this blatant destruction of an intelligent nations economic security would not seem to make sense, and the global economics would be moot.

Over the past 20 years, America has slowly been waning economically, first it was a few smaller companies, then it became larger and larger corporations who began outsourcing to cheaper foreign labor, and today we even have our own telephone and utility companies outsourcing telephone and collection jobs to people from countries we Americans cannot even understand. Each of these jobs that are outsourced to foreign countries represent the loss of American jobs here in America, and they are not being replaced by new industry. The American economy is faltering and it is only faltering because of the free trade agreements and the removal of other economic statues that were in place to protect us.

In the first quarter of 2008, 232 thousand jobs were lost, (http://money.cnn.com/2008/04/04/news/economy/jobs_march/), and there were 649,917 foreclosures and reposessions filed. Last year a couple mortgage companies were bailed out by being purchased by these high power banks which I will leave nameless, and now the Government, (being financed by these banks), is buying out poor student loans, (according to the evening financial report on PBS). What does all this mean? The majority of properties in the country will end up being foreclosed on due to a weak economy, and a handful of wealthy men in control of these banks who brought about this destruction will own those properties by foreclosure. In other words, the banks will own what you live in. The graduating students of tomorrows class will be in debt to the Government for their education, so in a failing economy, who do you think they will be working for? The government would be a good bet! Can you say, "Communism?"

So the future of America, as well as the rest of the world since the global economy seems to be anchored on the banks of the American economy, will be a place where people will live in the properties owned by the banks and will work measly jobs for the government who has financed their education, and once this has occurred, just as we have seen in communistic countries, since the government is going to take over the educational funding, it will likely dictate what field the individual will enter.

We are all familiar with the game Monopoly, well if you watch the key players in the global economics you will see that the majority of the properties are all being taken up by a handful of major players while the rest of the players are declaring bankruptcy. The major players even financed the little guy in an almost compassionate gesture of loaning for a small fee, but all the while it was geared toward inflating the prices beyond the grasp of the unemployed when the rug is yanked from under his feet. Today in the face of a failing economy, more and more unemployment, people losing their homes for lack of employment, the prices of gas are rising faster than ever as if Americans were spending more on gas than ever before. Would you like to take a stab at who financed the foreign oil wells? Do you think these people who financed all this and control even the middle east's economy might have some say in the price per barrel of gas? I'd lay a dollar to a doughnut that the development bank is the real voice behind the barrel prices. Do you remember in history, a little industrial nation that suddenly began losing all its jobs and hit an inflation rate so severe that money was sold to neighboring countries as scrap paper? It was Germany before Hitler came into power. An industrial powerhouse, a democracy, a country not unlike that of America, but this time if a Hitler comes into power, he will likely succeed in taking over the world. America dwarfs Hitlers Germany in military potency, but I for one see history repeating itself.