12

Global Warming: Earth's Reaction to Exponential Population Growth

Our Planet Will Regulate Us Along with Itself

dogslife11
The Chinese River Dolphin, or Baiji Dolphin, migrated to China's Yangtze River over 20,000 years ago from the Pacific Ocean. They are described in the oldest known dictionary, the Erya, composed during the Han Dynasty (206BC-AD220), and during that time it is estimated that 5,000 of the cetaceans existed. The dolphins were declared endangered in 1979 and by 1983 it was illegal to hunt them. In 1986 their population was at 300 and by 1997 only 23 were known to exist. In an expedition just completed earlier this month, not one specimen was found. This raises fears that humans may have wiped out its first species of dolphin. The dolphins are shy which makes them more difficult to locate, and the last sighting was in 2005. The idea that just a few are left is very sad.

There is also some uplifting news out of China: The Giant Panda has been declared no longer endangered by the country's top panda expert. This is due to a huge baby boom of pandas in captivity. Only 1,600 are believed to exist in the wild, spread across two provinces. There are plans to expand their protected areas and introduce new bamboo forests. No matter how many animals are born successfully in captivity, we cannot afford to lose their native habitat.

With all the talk of global warming, and the endangered species list growing, it seems we are in a race against time to save not only the animals but ourselves included. Slowly people are waking up to the reality that we're in big trouble if we refuse to change our ways. But will it be enough to save us in time? When the Baiji was declared endangered, only a few hundred existed. Knowing their population was once over 5,000 - this was a late call. It still took a few years after that just to make it illegal to kill them. It's an example of how we tend to deal with these types of problems. Passionate people see the danger long before laws are enacted and action is taken. A good example is Borneo, where slashing and burning is quickly putting the Orangutan on the brink of extinction. It's gotten so bad that they are scrambling to protect them, but again, it may not be enough.

The reason for all the forest destruction and clearing, overfishing, and pollution is the fact that this world has 6,000,000,000 people living on it. Fifty years ago it was less than half that! This exponential growth is something the world has never seen and there are just not enough resources to sustain us. Earth has mechanisms to regulate itself, but so does your body when you're running a high fever - it's trying to fix a problem. If it continues to warm, certain places will be so inhospitable that people will no longer be able to live there. Changing climate leads to changing ecosystems, which leads to temporary disruption of the planet's rhythm. During that disruption, we will see a moderate portion of the human population at risk.

We may laugh when Professor Stephen Hawking says in order to save ourselves, we'll have to colonize other planets. If you think about it, what other solution would there be unless the population stops growing? The rich and powerful nations need to make the issue of global warming paramount. We could get serious about clean energy and habitat conservation, creating fish farms, etc if we really wanted to. A fraction of what we spend in Iraq could do wonders. But the root of the problem is there's just too many people for this world to support. China's law of limiting how many children you can produce doesn't sound all that harsh anymore. The poorest parts of the world have the highest fertility rates and African women have an average of 5 children each! But instead of moving forward as a society, they are just using up resources and remaining poor. They are burning up our rain forests in order to make room, and that is much more dangerous than emissions from cars and industrial plants which are slowly becoming cleaner. We should stop throwing hundreds of billions into a war that's accomplishing nothing and help these countries become more efficient. By helping them, we're helping everyone. It may be a different country, but it's the same planet.

As we worry about losing our beloved animals due to human action, we should also realize that human action will be the cause of our own extinction, or at least a moderate setback. Everyone should watch "An Inconvenient Truth", narrated and presented by Al Gore. So many people refused to pay attention to this film only because Gore was behind it, when it had nothing to do with politics. If we can't set politics and religion aside to tackle the most important issue of our time, we won't have a hospitable Earth left to squabble on. We're at the mercy of this planet, and that's how we must view the situation.

  • The reason for all the forest destruction and clearing, overfishing, and pollution is the fact that this world has 6,000,000,000 on it. Fifty years ago it was less than half that.
  • Earth has mechansims to regulate itself, but so does your body when you're running a high fever: it's trying to fix a problem.
  • If we can't set politics and religion aside to tackle the most important issue of our time, we won't have a hospitable Earth left to squabble on.
Africa is the poorest continent but also has the highest fertility rate in the world.

7 Comments

Post a Comment
  • A. J. King1/2/2007

    well thats the whole point, it is a blood feud - eventually the strongest militia will win and we may end up with someone worse than Saddam....Speaking Saddam, yes, he was a iron fisted dictator, but he was our friend all thru the 80s and we supplied him with whatever weapons he had. Why would Saddam fund Al Qaeda and allow them to operate in his country? Dictators like Saddam would never allow shadowy terror groups to form in their country - that would be a threat to him. What would be the point? The idea that Saddam funded Al Qaeda would link Saddam to 9/11 which has been proven false over and over... the right wing mouthpieces can say whatever they want til they are blue in the face, it doesnt change the facts.

  • Daniel Doyle1/2/2007

    Anyway, yes, I do believe that Bush cares about the country and us. And I do believe that if there was a minute he would be as interested in caring for the planet as you, or even me for that matter. Problem is, there are a lot of nutty people that need some attention right now. That was the reason I suggested that to do something ourselves or yourself is maybe a better plan than looking for someone else to do it. Afterall, it has been said that one man well lead can beat a hundred without a head-Socrates- and I suggested that you might wanna try to tackle that concern you have there about the earth. I certainly did not mean to kick you. Merely to offer a suggestion about how you as one man may want to grab the bull by the horns and do a thing for our future.

  • Daniel Doyle1/2/2007

    (foreseeable, and I) ...believe manageable. Al Qaida saw the weakness and vulnerability there and is exploiting it to it's hilt. We do need a lot of work on that. Problem is, we are talking about a blood feud that is centuries old. Read some more of my ramblings and you'll get a picture of it. Keep on grinning!

  • Daniel Doyle1/2/2007

    Not really so. There is more playing out in Iraq and Iran than what we see at that which is obvious. The people of Iran are not our problem. They are in fact quite westrnized, and they are shiite. TThey will align with Iraq, they will not align with what is going on there. The last elections actually saw this that I say played out. The Iraqis will also be a better ally with the USA than they were in the past only clandestinely under Saddam. The next thing that must be seen is that Saddam had a distinct money trail to Al-Qaida. They were very active groups in northern Iraq training and recruiting. Handy for the libz that America does not remember that. Look how quickly Al-Qaida was active and in position there. It was immediate. The one thing that was sadly underscored and disproportionately credited for potential impact was the sunni-shiite conflict that took root primarily last February and quickly blew into all-out feud. That was neglect-fully handled and it was foreseeable, and I be

  • A. J. King12/29/2006

    I do everything I can in my personal life to be conscious of the environment. Calling on your government is not whining, because we elected the government to work for us. You think Bush is working to keep us alive?? Nobody loves the fact that we invaded Iraq more than Iran. No matter when we leave, Iran and Iraq will become allies, and we will have a more united Middle East aligned against us. Saddam was a thorn in the side of Iran, and was a secular dictator who saw Al Qaida as a threat, not a friend. Stategically, we would have left him in power to run his little country and dealt with the bigger picture. If we want to make a difference in the world, we need to start paying attention to the plight in Africa and other developing nations.

  • Daniel Doyle12/29/2006

    ...(a value) ...of this freedom we have. You can do it if you want to. Get it going. I bet a ball that he'll not stop you. I bet no one will. We can't look for other people to do what we can see needs to be done. That is called "whining".

  • Daniel Doyle12/29/2006

    Interesting. If I expounded upon your last two or three sentences I could give reason to them in how money is being spent in iraq is a part of that very issue. If we do not do something about getting people with good voices in the Middle East the ability to use them we will never get the squabbles to relax while we costernate over the more lucid realities you speak of. I ask, how do we get terrorists to listen to these concerns when they want what it is that you claim is going to happen. Allegiances must be shaped and molded and we are an evolving group of inhabitants. We writhe about here and squabble over things that take our vision from what matters...what do we do with the criminally insane madmen while we save the earth? Tough. Very tough stuff. I wonder, do we really think our pres does not care of these things? Would he be working on this stuff with you if he could? I think so. I also think he cannot right now. He is busy keeping us alive. Maybe you should do it. That is a value

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.