The points of the plan, according to GM's press release, are:
* Payment protection for the first 24 months of ownership. GM will make up to nine payments for up to $500 per month if you lose your job.
* Finance a new GM vehicle and GM will help protect its retail value at trade-in time on your next GM vehicle.
* GM's in car security and information system, On Star, for a year
* 5 year/100,000 mile limited powertrain warranty with roadside assistance and courtesy transportation
During the press conference, GM was mocking Ford for having very little information about their own plan. Ironically, the GMConfidence.com website touted by GM during the news conference, is not working at this time, so details beyond the press release were rather thin.
While it understandable that General Motors is trying to do everything it can to spur sales, there isn't much in the GM Total Confidence plan to instill confidence in the buyer.
The payment protection plan is certainly a good start for people worried about losing their job, and is indeed currently best in the industry, with 24 months of protection (vs. 12 for Hyundai and Ford). But this type of coverage has the potential of being easily matched or bested by its stronger competitors. In fact, it is now even being offered by individual dealerships.
Protecting a car's retail value at the time of trade in is an interesting proposition. An an industry full of fine print, asterisks, and dense copy read at a rapid pace, it will be interesting to see how GM defines "retail value" when it comes time to trade in the car you buy today. And if GM's situation is as grim as President Obama's recent tough talk would lead us to believe, will there even be a "next GM vehicle" for you to purchase when you want to trade it in?
On Star for a year is probably the least value in this package. While GM's service is certainly nice to have if you're in a major accident, your car is stolen, or you've locked your keys in, how often do these events happen to the average buyer, and does having this feature make up for the lack of other standard technology in GM vehicles, most notably navigation systems.
The 5 year / 100,000 mile limited powertrain warranty with roadside assistance and courtesy transportation again is also nice, but something that other manufacturers could easily add to their offerings if they don't have it already.
The problem with all of these items is that they're being offered by a company with an unknown future, which is probably the single biggest issue that GM, Chrysler, and Ford have in trying to sell their cars. Nobody wants to buy a car from a company that is no longer in business or has restructured to the point where they no longer support what they sold in the past. Just ask Daewoo owners. Unless GM fleshes out the plan a little more, it is unclear if any of these confidence items, except for the payment protection plan, which is handled by an outside agency, will still be honored if the company is restructured, or worse, goes out of business. And given the fact that GM's quality is much improved, but still lackluster as a whole, it is difficult to imagine people wanting to take a risk on a $20,000 or $30,000 purchase of a GM vehicle without either some substantial discounts or some reassurances that there will be a General Motors around to support the vehicle. And then there is the question of the resale value of any GM product if the company goes out of business or restructures.
The GM Total Confidence plan is a nice additional incentive for GM buyers, but falls far short of providing GM buyers confidence that their major vehicle purchase is secure. Hopefully this is only a minor step in GM's attempt to regain its footing in the industry and save itself from failure.
Published by Crutnacker
Freelance writer and business professional from Louisville, Kentucky. Husband, father of one beautiful daughter and three annoying cats. Lived in Maryland, Boston, MA, and Louisville, KY. View profile
General Motors Bailout? Can We Afford Not To?To be or not to be, that is the economic question facing legislators, the current and incoming presidents,. labor leaders, suppliers and manufacturers, unions and individuals af...- Saving General Motors Versus Repeating the Lehman DebacleNot rescuing General Motors could bring down the whole U.S. auto industry and eliminate hundreds of thousands or millions of jobs. Given that pessimists' predictions have proven accurate in the current crisis, a GM b...
- Auto Industry TV Ads: No CreativityFootball and basketball telecasts are peppered with auto industry advertising, but do these spots catch your attention?
- General Motors Runs Ads for an Electric Car, "the Volt"Politicians and citizens are asking for alternative cars. Will General Motors, Chrysler and Ford respond in time?
- Contrast: Wall Street Bailout, Auto Industry BailoutCongress is debating the auto industry bailout, but the Wall Street bailout is starting to draw more attention.
- Government Tax Cuts for General Motors
- Toyota Motor Corporation: Strategic Analysis
- UAW Strike of General Motors is Imminent, Inside Sources Say
- General Motors Strike Ripples Across Michigan
- United Auto Workers and General Motors Strike on September 26, 2007
- Where Will it All End? Demands on Federal Government Grow to Over $1 Trillion
- Will Barack Obama Make His First Big Mistake by Supporting an Auto Industry Bailout?




2 Comments
Post a Commentthe question i have is i purchased a vehicle in september 2008 so i have not had this vehicle very long i want to keep it for its the only transportation i have so is there anyway i can also get approved for this offer since yes i too have also lost my job.
Very well written piece.