GMA Failed on the Aruba Suspect Interview

Without disclosing information about the missing woman in Aruba that traveled with a rich businessman, Robin of GMA failed on the Aruba suspect interview. The evidence was stacked up against the suspect but Robin of GMA did not get him to answer the most important question. The most important question was what happened on August 2, 2011 when the woman disappeared while on vacation with a 1.5 million insurance policy that was beneficial to the rich businessman.

The businessman came on GMA with his three sons and a lawyer but knew that he had Robin of GMA floored when she accepted that he would not answer the first and the most important question. What happened on August 2, 2011 when a casual relationship companion got lost while on vacation who had been insured for $1.5 million just prior to going on vacation with the rich man.

Nancy Grace a former prosecutor who had been questioned on GMA about the Aruba suspect would have done a better job of interviewing the rich businessman. Robin of GMA approach was too weak. Robin has been better on these interviews almost in an Oprah way, which is understanding and non-opinionated as to whether or not the party was guilty. But to leave an interview where the questions were not answered left the public to read news account to get their own opinion. The Aruba suspect interview on GMA did not reveal any answers to what the public was interested in about the Aruba vacationer who returned $1.5 million richer and the insured woman supposedly lost at sea.

Robin of GMA accepted the fact that a $1.5 million insurance policy could be obtained in a matter of clicks of a computer mouse that could not be unclicked as the Aruba suspect claimed. That latter answer was the response when the businessman was asked why had he taken out the 1.5 million-dollar insurance policy on the missing woman before taking the trip to Aruba where she was reported missing.

Other answers that Robin of GMA asked without disputing the suspect's answer was why inquiries were made about the insurance policy while the woman was still missing. The businessman answered that he asked about the policy because he would have to pay the searches who checked the beaches of Aruba for the missing woman whom he had met on online.

Also the GMA interview bombed because the three children were allowed to come onto the TV program seemingly as moral support. The taped union of the man when he first reached American soil to meet his sons depicted three boys who appeared not overjoyed to see their Dad who had been incarcerated in Aruba.. The three sons' presence on GMA was most likely a family image that the lawyer wanted to depict of the prime suspect in the case of the missing woman. The three boys were not seated but stood up behind their father, the suspect, while the father and the lawyer sat facing Robin of GMA around a circular table.

GMA should have used the legal experts that had been following the case to interview the Aruba suspect who at one point told Robin of GMA that he would conduct his own interview. What? It was not logical for Robin to question the Aruba suspect when she had been questioning the ABC television network legal analysts about the case. It would seem that the legal analyst would have held that interview more appropriately because the Aruba suspect and his lawyer had the scenario set with preconceived answers. GMA failed on the Aruba suspect interview.