But there are detractors, Rupert Murdoch, head of Fox News, is the biggest one. He has threatened to block his news sites from Google completely. This comes after recent complaints that news is not making enough money, and the switch of Fox News to pay content. Google has commented that they help generate more viewers for publishers through their search and that any publisher does have the option to completely block Google.
Now the big issue is not the first click, it is the possibility to constantly go back to Google search and find new articles to read for free. This could be an issue, though I highly doubt that there are enough people exploiting this to read news for free on a subscription site. There are so many other options for news stories that the hypothetical reader would have to be obsessed with a certain news site but unwilling to pay the small subscription fee.
This whole scenario seems to be complaining from Murdoch and other corporate heads who are wanting to switch from the current free news model so they can make more money. The thing is that readers of the internet will always go to the free model when it comes to news. As long as quality websites are delivering high quality news stories, only the most devoted readers will pay for a specific news site. When great news sources like the New York Times decided to move away from he subscription model, you know it isn't the best of ideas.
Personally I would rather see Rupert Murdoch try and block Google from his website so he can see the amount of clicks on articles drop. Google and other search engines help bring a lot of eyes to various news sites and it is only in their best interest to keep those lines open. Even without the subscription fee, they still make money off advertisements on their websites. It seems more a complaint about not making more money then making no money at all.
Sources: http://www.nasdaq.com/aspx/stock-market-news-story.aspx?storyid=200912011449dowjonesdjonline000386&title=google-to-let-news-groups-set-reader-limits
http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20091201-712081.html
Published by Allen Wiggs
Allen has spent years as a dreamer and decided to stop dreaming and start doing. He writes articles, short stories, and is working on a new web show that will premiere in March 2010. View profile
- Obama May Have to Come to the Table "Better Prepared" If He is Going to Address Fo...The President says that Fox News is a talk radio program, though sounds a bit unconvinced ...
President Obama's White House Attacks Fox NewsThe Obama administration has picked a feud with Fox News Channel. Was this a good idea, or is the White House's plan ill-conceived and ineffective?
Foxing Fox NewsNot talking to Fox News because it is biased could be worse for the president than including them.- The New Friendship with Democrats and Fox News: Sign of a Democratic Split?Seeing all those Democrats on Fox News lately seems to indicate to me that they're potentially split three ways. One side to the right goes Terry McAuliffe, one side to the left goes Howard Dean...and Hillary Clinton...
The Big, Bad Fox NewsFox News isn't even conservative, but moderate; it only looks conservative because of the alternatives.
- ColorOfChange.Org Begins Petition Aimed at Fox News Owner Rupert Murdoch
- Google Adsense for Passive Website Income
- How to Run and Grow Your Own Subscription Website
- How to Make New XM-Sirius Subscription Plans More Attractive
- Are Subscription Music Services Worth the Price?
- Megan Fox as Catwoman? If You Believe Fox News
- Examining the Obama Fox News Debacle




