GOP Candidate Rick Perry's Plan for Taxes

Texas, Not Taxes, nor the California Way

Lorraine Yapps Cohen

"Texas, not California, better be the American future." Such was the admonishment of Daniel Henninger in his Wall Street Journal editorial. Texas flourishes while California declines. How Texas handles taxes shows what works.

The pro-business environment in Texas trumps the pro-environment environment in California. Texas favors people doing well. California favors bugs, birds, and beaches doing well.

One can see wellness in how the two states run themselves. Texas gets out of the way of prosperity; California taps prosperity for public use.

The remarkable differences lay mostly in taxes. Texas Governor and GOP candidate Rick Perry has a plan for tax in America, should he be elected.

Perry's plan for taxes

Individuals would have the option of a 20% flat tax. No complicated filing is required, yet deductions for mortgage interest, local and state taxes, and charity would be allowed.

No tax is collected on long-term capital gains or dividends. No income tax would be collected from a family of four earning $50,000.

The tax rate for businesses would be 20%. A cap of 18% of GDP would be placed on federal spending.

Tax plan for prosperity

Perry's plan contrasts with Obama's plan to tax Americans into oblivion. To see how well that works, check out California's tax-and-spend policies sending people and businesses out of state. Where do they go? You guessed it: Texas.

Read Henninger's account of four businesses--from small ones to big ones--that relocated in Texas. "In California, you are always doing something wrong," said one. Another bemoaned California government constantly setting out impediments to doing business there.

Perry's Texas gets out of the way of business. A 175-year legacy of laissez faire and free markets allow businesses to flourish. Texas is a place of prosperity and jobs, and the place where people who used to have both go to get them again. That puts the exodus as a one-way trip out of California, and America if we let it.

Consider the magnet America would be if it had the people- and business-friendly tax code Perry proposes. The legacy of Texas prosperity can be applied to this nation of states. Perry brings it to voters in simple form and straight from experience.

No other candidate can match the substance and degree of tax reform of Perry's plan. Herman Cain's 9-9-9 plan may be unachievable. Mitt Romney's plan isn't enough. Michael J. Boskin, an economist of repute, compares the candidates' plans in a WSJ editorial and sees no better one than Perry's for turning America around.

Besides, Perry's plan comes with a track record of success. What more could we want?


Published by Lorraine Yapps Cohen

I design jewelry free from the constraints of textbook techniques and write non-fiction free from the rigors of technical expression. Chemist by training, creative by spirit, conservative in values, and art...  View profile

10 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Linda Riggs11/8/2011

    Interesting stuff.

  • James Fenelius11/8/2011

    Well done.

  • Sivaramakrishnan Ananthanarayanan11/7/2011

    Love the comparison and the strong case you have made, Lorraine. If America invests to become self sufficient in energy, it could solve most problems - of deficits and unemployment. Bring back the glory of old should be the clarion call - siva

  • Gerald Kennedy11/6/2011

    Tax plans have to be good for the country AND the majority of people. Perry's tax plan is interesting, but it's on top of the other 71,648 pages of tax code and loopholes that we have to deal with. Any flat tax effectively benefits the wealthy and leaves the middle and lower class with less to live on. Trickle down from the wealthy does not exist. If Perry does get elected, I'd have to wait and see which way to jump. I'd be hopeful, but, realistically, can any one person make a difference with our dysfunctional government?
    Yeah...I live in Texas. Haven't decide who to vote for...

  • Mike Powers11/6/2011

    We shall see about Perry's tax plan. I'm still a bit skeptical. Great report, thanks!

  • Judy (Montelauro) Harrell11/6/2011

    I love this article and especially about California caring more about wildlife than people! People should always come first! That is why I want Perry to win because he is a Godly man who cares about people not just animals and beaches! After all God put us over animals in Genesis! Love your spirit!

  • Mary Oberg11/5/2011

    It will be interesting to see who gets the nomination!

  • J P Whickson11/5/2011

    I'm still waiting to make my decision.

  • Michele Starkey11/5/2011

    Sounds good, Lorraine, cheers ;)

  • Harriet Steinberg11/4/2011

    Well, California is where I LIVE almost all of my life----so I love it here!!!!!

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.