Government Regulation Got Us into This Mess
Two Wrongs Don't Make a Right, but Two Parties Make a Blight!
As they vilify the greed and evil of investors and corporate executives they ignore the truth and refuse to tell the American people the facts about the genesis of the current economic crisis.
It was government regulation that planted the seeds of this debacle, and now they propose swinging the same regulatory club to crush the skull of the American private enterprise like some fur trader battering a baby seal.
Ugly metaphor? Our liberty and the free market are helpless, and the politicians are drumming up blood lust in main street America to empower the government to crush it and take over.
In 1977 the passage of the Community Reinvestment Act initiated a government compulsion for banks to begin lending money that could never be paid back. It was all as lovely and well intentioned as unicorns and rainbows. It wasn't a chicken in every pot, it was a roof over every head. Who could argue with a regulation that forced banks to give loans to enable people who otherwise would have to work twenty or so years and save their money to buy a house right here, right now?
God forbid people have to do what our parents did to get a house: save money and live within and even below their means for years, even decades. That's just awful. CRA solved the horrific problem of some people having to rent houses or even (I cringe in horror at the thought) rent an apartment.
The crafting of that regulation, and it's subsequent strengthening over the years has allowed community activist organizations to blackmail lending institutions into contributions. It has led to the weaknesses greedy and evil people exploited to profit obscenely at the expense of the general public. Politicians on both sides of the aisle knew what was going on.
Some politicians called for more regulations earlier than now, but none called for abolishing the act that created the problem. They knew the cause, but their proposed solution belied their nature: those in power never respond to a problem by relinquishing power. They use problems as excuses to acquire more power.
The so-called 'victims' were just folks who were too damn stupid to figure out they were living beyond their means when they applied for and received loans they could never repay.
Government regulation, designed to provide opportunity for advancement, resulted only in opportunity for stupid people to do stupid things on a larger scale, and for corrupt people to do corrupt things on a larger scale.
Opportunity to succeed with dignity and honor doesn't come from regulation, it comes from freedom.
Regulation, by its very definition, is removal of freedom.
The great founders of this country fought a bloody revolution against a tyrant for freedom. Today our top politicians cry for regulation (AKA removal of freedom) and the people cheer. That is simply perverse.
Fellow Americans, I implore you to consider this as you prepare to cast your vote: The vast majority of our politicians, Republican and Democrat, are corrupt. They are drunk with power, and though they fight each other like poisonous snakes in a heated pit, they will band together to sacrifice the liberty of the American people and bring about the demise of our free industries to consolidate and ensure their control. THAT is the only bi-partisanship you can count on.
Sure, I'll admit that the Republicans are a little better. Casting a vote for McCain/Palin will lead our liberties to ruin at 99 miles per hour instead of the 100 miles per hour to the same destination on the Obama/Biden bus. It ain't a bridge to nowhere...it's a highway to hell.
I know many Americans would love to see a third party take charge but they won't vote for one because they presume it would be a wasted vote. I wonder if Obama winning this election would be such a bad thing since the resulting four years of indescribable disaster would teach us such a lesson in hard knocks that no liberal would get elected for another 40 years.
But the Republicans just aren't much better.
The GOP will not change it's ways until it is handed a resounding defeat that it knows came from votes cast for a third party. As long as they think their base will always vote for them out of fear of Democrat control they will never reform. The only thing that will turn the Republican party back to its conservative roots is a defeat decidedly caused by the massive siphoning of votes in a major election to a conservative third party.
The Libertarians cannot win this election, but they can be the tool that starts the reform of the Republican party and possibly breaks the stranglehold of our de facto two-party system
Help me send a message to these parties that we are not going to continue to allow them to take their place in the people's government for granted. Listen to Twisted Sister's 'We're Not Gonna Take It' for twenty-four hours straight before you go to the polls if you need to fortify your resolve, but do the right thing instead of the less evil thing for once in an American presidential election.
Both these parties have been parasites drinking your family's blood for decades, neither deserves your vote.
Published by Timothy Frazier
Tim is a freelance blogger and creative writer living in Grapevine, Texas. He enjoys riding his Triumph Rocket III, woodworking, and making his Grandson, Jade, giggle. He and his wonderful wife, Robin, ha... View profile
- Why You Should Still Become a Mortgage Broker During the Sub-Prime CrisisThis article are for those wanting to become mortgage brokers during the sub prime crisis.
Sub-Prime Mortgages: The Latest De-Regulation Fall OutThere are state and federal agencies that have responsibility for overseeing the mortgage market, but with the massive number of foreclosures on the books, someone was asleep at...- Foreclosures Are Not Just for Sub-prime Borrower's As we watch an alarming increase in foreclosures nationwide, pointing the finger at sub prime borrowers, we have a new borrower resigning themselves and walking away.
- Lawsuits and Insurance Implications in Sub-Prime LendingIf you are a borrower under a sub-prime lending agreement, it is important to know what legal and insurance risks may be associated with your mortgage.
Will the End of Sub Prime Cause Rates to Rise?We may not like the way he has set the standards on who should get the relief, however, in the bond market there are indicators signally we could be seeing an end to sub prime p...
- Sub Prime Lenders: Who Qualifies for a Bad Credit Mortgage?
- What's All the Buzz on Sub Prime Mortgages
- Will the Sub Prime Mortgage Crisis Hurt Real Estate?
- Fed Chairman Downplays Economic Effects of Sub-Prime Woes
- Wells Fargo Bank Getting Out of the Sub-Prime Home Loans Market
- How Congress Can Fix the Sub Prime Mortgage Meltdown
- The Sub-Prime Lending Crisis and Its Future Impact



5 Comments
Post a CommentHang 'em all, the seditious bastards! Congress only cares about their own ambition! They deserve prison (or worse!)
A sage analysis with many germane points. I learned today that among the pork in the bailout bill is funding for a study on lobster dog biscuits, this is one of many. Rasmussen reports 59 % of people think we should fire the whole congress and start over essentially. Other polls show the Independent vote is much higher than years past as you probably know. I too wonder if Obama is elected if Republicans will control everything for at least 12 to 16 years, if not the 40 you state. Lastly, and I could go on, I can not dispel from my mind a documentary on people who obtained housing that was so incredibly beyond their means....one example was a woman who earned $40K a year...her house $765K (or thereabouts), she received two loans and is looking for help to keep it.
It is definitely interesting to read about the range of views about this election and the issues facing our country.
I'm not blaming lower income folks...I'm blaming the two controlling political parties. And trace it back, the CRA is at the root of it all. Just because you have a liberal political world view doesn't change historical fact and a documented chain of events.
Wow! I must disagree on so many levels. Considering that Wall St. execs make $30-50 million dollars per year, get massive tax breaks, and are not held accountable for running major, publicly traded financial institutions into the ground, it seems a bit odd to blame the CRA for the economic disaster facing the country/world. As far as people living beyond their means, we the people are doing it nationally to the tune of 10 trillion as a collective and individually we also have a tendency to rely heavily on credit. The country as a whole needs a fundamental shift in its thinking, not just lower income folks.