I'm sorry I missed you. I attended a rally outside your office today. It wasn't anything like the rally I attended when I supported your first campaign. We were a small group, possibly 200 in total.
Most of our group were disabled. I sat on the lawn, just in front of the south steps, beside a woman with a cane. Standing in front of me, because he didn't know he was blocking my view, was a very vocal and young blind man. Behind me were wheelchairs with their occupants, seniors with their infirmities and transit employees who took an early lunch hour like me.
You see, Mr. Schwarzenegger, I work for Sacramento Regional Transit. I noticed that there weren't many transit employees there. As Mr. Mike Wiley, our General Manager, expressed, we have already cut all the fat we can cut. There is no fat remaining. The lean staff was back at the office, keeping the wheels rolling for your public.
As I said, I work for Sacramento Regional Transit. I struggled to get my job. I am an entry-level administrative assistant working in the Customer Advocacy Department. The road to that desk also led to my story.
I arrived in Sacramento in 2001. I could not afford to live here. Something had to give. I gave up my automobile. In 2001 I estimated that I was saving between six hundred and one thousand dollars a month. I had no car payments, no insurance, no repair bills and, obviously, no gasoline to purchase.
I used transit to fill most of my needs. I found a place to live on a bus line. I found a job on a bus line. I lost the job because the bus wouldn't run late enough for my shift. I got another job on a bus line. I met my husband on a bus line.
My husband came to Sacramento when he became disabled. He cannot drive. He depends on Regional Transit. He found a place to live on a bus line. He found a place to work on a bus line. He met me on a bus line.
Everything we do outside our home depends on a bus or our own two feet.
It seemed only reasonable that I would go to work for the bus company. I make an extremely modest salary. But I am very grateful for my job and for the service I can give to the community.
About two weeks ago, I sent you a letter that read like this:
"I urge your strong opposition to the anti-transit components of your proposed 2008-2009 State Budget. The proposed diversion of $1.4 billion from the Public Transportation Account (PTA) will drastically impact our mobility and quality of life. The current proposal balances a disproportionate amount of the State's budget shortfall solution on the backs of millions of Californians (like us) who rely on transit.
My husband and I are totally reliant upon public transportation. We settled in Sacramento because we cannot afford to own a car and Sacramento has a respectable public transportation system. We are not yet elderly but my husband is physically disabled. We both work outside the home and cannot fathom the effects that a reduction in transit services would have on our lives.
With the recent increase in gas prices, Sacramento Regional Transit District (RT) has seen a substantial increase in ridership figures. It reflects the fiscal responsibility of many Californians who are turning to public transportation in order to balance their own budgets in spite of rising gas prices. RT should be adding service, not eliminating it."
Do you know what your staff sent to me as a response? Are you aware of how callous and uncaring they have made you appear? Here are just a few lines from that response email.
I appreciate your input during this challenging budget year. Do you really?
Your letter went on to say:
"This crisis is real, and it is very serious. Because of the size of our deficit, we need to make some very difficult cuts. I know they will be painful, which is why they are so hard for me to make."
Oh, really? Painful cuts, you say? I cannot fathom how you are you going to feel the pain of reducing public transportation.
Did you hear that 43% more people rode public transit in Sacramento immediately following the increase in gas prices to over $4.00 a gallon? I hear from light rail passengers crammed aboard standing room only trains. They travel like that for 30 minutes each way. Buses are also full to standing room only. By the way, most disabled patrons cannot stand while a bus or train is in motion.
Now we anticipate gas prices to climb to $5.00 a gallon and many more people will turn to public transit to make ends meet. What will they do next winter when Sacramento Regional Transit is forced to cut 10% of their service to these folks?
Last year, when you stole money from public transportation to balance the state budget, RT eliminated weekend service for some of the bus lines. My heart breaks because I hear about it everyday. I hear from the stranded elderly and disabled unable to enjoy the simple things in life on the weekends. They call and cry and try to convince me that going to the grocery, the movies or to church is precious to them. One lady calls every Sunday to remind me that she can't attend church services anymore. Everyone else basically gave up calling. They know they don't count. They blame Regional Transit because they don't know that you caused their pain.
The rest of your response letter detailed how you plan to "be creative and find new revenues without raising taxes. In fact, my revised budget does just that by eliminating half of our deficit through spending reductions and the other half through new sources of revenue, while fully funding Proposition 98 for education, keeping our state parks open and not releasing inmates early."
I'm sorry Governor. That is all empty rhetoric to those of us who will bear the pain when you shift $1 billion in transit revenue to the General Fund deficit.
You are robbing us of freedom and mobility. Your budget will make many Californians prisoners in their own homes.
.
Published by Sharon Cohen
Having dabbled in multiple careers and innumerable hobbies, I have finally realized that my greatest earthly endeavor is that of being a wife. I am an helpmeet - from the Hebrew work "ezer" - meaning to sur... View profile
- Can There Really Be Such a Thing as Happily Ever After in Fairy Tales?
- Why You Really Don't Want To Get Thin
- Fred Thompson Presents Immigration Plan: For All Those Who Really Really Want Tom...
- Top Requested Items for Soldier Care Packages
- Homeschoolers Find Ally in Governor Schwarzenegger
- I urge your strong opposition to the anti-transit components of your proposed 2008-2009 State Budget
- With the recent increase in gas prices Californians are turning to public transportation.
- Californians need added services, not elimination of current services.


21 Comments
Post a CommentYou make a most compelling case, Sharon. I haven't got a car either... a cut in public transportation seems totally contrast to logic just when we're trying to ward off the increasing oil price and the greenhouse gases. Hope your essay gets a lot of read! :o)
A very impressive article about a subject which is only going to grow in importance because America still has no cohesive and viable energy policy. Keep knocking on those palace doors Sharon...one day soon the royalty which hides behind them will no longer be able to ignore you and the millions standing with you. Bravo!
Sharon, I love how you have personalized the problem. Living in the Sacramento areas as well, I read articles in the Bee almost daily on the hardships various program cuts cause individual people. However, in this case, not only are individuals hurt, but society as a whole is hurt... as more pollutants fill the air, more traffic fills the roads, etc. While I would not want to be in the Governor's shoes as far as what programs to cut, I agree with you that transit should not be one of them. I also think the response to your letter should have been a bit less form letterish. Maybe you should apply for a job with Arnold's communication department and get one of those 200K + salaries, some of which you could donate back to transit : )
Calif. group says stimulus checks went for gas
The Associated Press
Article Launched: 06/26/2008 03:43:21 PM PDT
SACRAMENTO-A California consumer group is calling for more federal funding for public transportation, saying that most families have already spent their economic stimulus checks on pricey gasoline.
The California Public Interest Research Group calculates that an average household has spent more than $1,300 on gasoline since mid-February, when President Bush signed the tax rebate law.
The group says much of the stimulus money wound up going to oil companies, and points out that gas prices are higher in areas with less public transportation.
I'm sure he won't feel the pain of these cuts given the fact that he's a multi-millionaire that doesn't have to worry about money issues and getting to and from places. But if you keep raising your voice eventually it will be heard, hopefully sooner rather than later. I commend you for having the guts to stand up for what you know is right. I wish you nothing but success and happiness in the future:)
This is interesting voice, good going !
This is simply superb! No matter what anyone's opinion is when it comes to mass transit (but I can say that I sure wish we had decent mass transit here) the economic realities of high gas prices have forced many to turn to mass transit. You revealed exactly how one person - and many- could feel when faced with the loss of mass transit. You put a personal face on the situation and I hope people take that to heart and think carefully about the realities.
Thanks for mentioning salaries, Amanda. Four years ago, barely three dozen California state workers earned a base salary of more than $200,000. Today, as the state faces a fiscal crisis, close to 1,000 state workers make that much! About 17,500 permanent, full-time state employees make six-figure base salaries - about one of every 14. Not included in those counts were University of California workers, and an additional 11,500 of them also earn six-figure salaries, or one in 10.5. Officials at state agencies said workers getting top raises do vital jobs, ranging from prescribing medicine that keeps prisoners from attacking guards to managing billions of dollars in retirement savings. The pay increases, they say, were necessary to remain competitive with the private sector.
Why cant they cut back on these officials salaries instead of cutting something much needed? A salary cut of ten percent wouldnt hurt what they are making.If I were one of them I would volunteer a cut in my pay. I dont know hoe much their city managers and such make but it is a lot more than the average people.
I place blame on the Governor, CJ, because he did the same thing last year and said he would not do it again. From what we heard - it was a one time fix. We swallowed our pride and did not protest. We took it "laying down" as it is said for less money than this time and it hurt - it cost Sacramentans 5% of their service. I don't know about the bigger California cities or the rural transit agencies or the Paratransit type servcies. I can blame the Governor because he went back on his word. I have a problem with politicans who go back on their word. I campaigned for the man - I was so excited to have him as a Governor, in the beginning. I have been supportive of him until this one maneuver. He is choosing to take money from public transit when public transit may be the only solution some families have for mobility. There are other options - he needs to be more creative and find them.