GQ Photo Uproar Marks the Beginning of the Glee Backlash

James Hamel
Come on now, we have all seen the GQ photos featuring the cast of Glee and they look like pretty much any semi-perverted fashion spread you find in magazines like this. And if you haven't seen them I will tell you what all the fuss is about.

Apparently Lea Michelle (who plays Rachel) had her legs spread opened too wide for parent media watchdog groups and Diana Agron (who plays Quinn) had on a pair of short shorts that were just too short. Then Lea made the ultimate mistake of suggestively licking a lollipop while leaning up against a locker.

The reaction to these photos is best summed up in the inflammatory statement made by Tim Winters of the Parents Television Council. His claim was that "it borders on pedophilia." Mr. Winters must have a very sick and twisted little mind to equate anything that goes on every week on Glee with pedophilia.

Come on now, these actors are well into their 20's. They can't take some artistic, saucy photos without causing a National uproar? And it's not like these photos were being published in Tiger Beat. GQ is not the type of magazine that suburban youth tend to buy very often. Or ever. It is a very adult magazine that deals with adult issues and features racy photo spreads.

Ms. Agron had this to say about the drama, "They asked us to play heightened versions of our school characters. At the time, it wasn't my favorite idea, but I did not walk away. If you are hurt or these photos make you uncomfortable, it was never our intention. And if your eight-year-old has a copy of our GQ cover in hand, again I am sorry. But I would have to ask, how on earth did it get there?"

This brings me to my next point. Ever since it became public that Barack Obama's kids love Glee it has started to become looked at as a "kid's show." These outraged parents (Katie Couric among them) who claim to watch it with their youngsters might want to reconsider what they are doing.

I know kids grow up faster today but Glee has never shied away from showing skin, addressing hot button topics or being overtly sexual. Also, the creator of Glee also created the very dark, disturbing and sexual Nip/Tuck. You don't do a show about plastic surgeons and then fling yourself into a remake of Barney the Purple Dinosaur.

My final point? Glee is not a kids show and GQ is not a magazine for kids. Why don't you wait to vilify this successful young cast until they have actually done something wrong? And it's Hollywood so you know it's coming.

Published by James Hamel - Featured Contributor in Automotive

I live near Laguna Beach, CA and am a full time freelance auto journalist who got his start on this very website. Now I work for 3 sites full time reviewing and road testing new cars. Contact me via twitter...  View profile

2 Comments

Post a Comment
  • greg10/26/2010

    I love Glee (which is not a kids show, not even a little, and kids should NOT be watching it), and I get it that THESE ARE NOT REAL PEOPLE, THEY ARE ACTORS. In a fake show written for entertainment. Anyone who thinks these people look 16 doesn't remember high school very well. Should they have conceived a different setting? Possibly. But despite the theme of the shoot, these people look 25. And "pedophilia"? Really? I don't think of people having sex with children, I think of these characters having sex with each other. Which, by the way, is a HUGE aspect of the show.

  • AnthonyA10/25/2010

    LEa Michelle just did a topless shoot for Claire magazine about a week or two eeks ago and there was no uproar. These phots are tamer in comparison but it wasnt a pic about the Adult actors. They took pics of the Glee characters who are portrayed as minors (16 yr olds) in the TV show. The shoot was titled Glee Gone wild set in a high school with Cory playing drums like his character and Dianne with a megaphone prop WMHS(glee high school) and pompoms evoking her teenage character. The charge borderline pedophelia is legitimate as their are using Adult legal actors to pose as minors. Even though Cory is approaching 30, what is the cut off for being borderline should they use 18 yr olds posing as middle schoolers of 12 or 13 or even 14 yrs old in the same exact shoot and the same magazine in the same suggestive poses? The problem is not the actors ages and their right to pose for those pics as they can do whatever they want. Whether Glee is for kids or not is irrelevant. IT's the

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.