Graffiti:

Good Art Form or Pure Vandalism?

Bettina R. Smith
We have seen all different forms of art, ranging from the simplest to the most complex, even with graffiti. But the question is can graffiti be a positive medium to expressing art or just vandalizing property?

It depends on which individuals are being asked the question. If anyone asks me, graffiti can represent both an art expression and vandalism.

Overall, graffiti has many connotations with the hip-hop phenomenon being one of the top ingredients besides the break dancing and rapping. Of course, we have seen graffiti in better known locations, such as the railroad train boxcars with bulky lettering. This is definitely common among groups who want to identify the territory.

In the history of graffiti, especially during the 1960s, it became popular by the proclamation, "Yossarian lives!" Joseph Heller referred this to one of the main characters in the novel, Catch-22. In this time period, as in May 1968, the students protested and as a result had seen political slogans in Paris such as L'ennui est-revolutionnaire, or "Boredom is counterrevolutionary."

However, there is a downside to graffiti. It is also used for the purpose of claiming a territory or a "turf" by tagging a building to let the opposing gangs that they exist. The tags will often have the name of the gang affiliation. Also, this is a warning that one of the gang members will be a target by embedding the street name of the gang member and crossing it out, or by tracking down the member's tags and omitting them.

If a gang writes over the opposing gang's tag, then there is a possibility that they are preparing to take control of that particular territory and/or aggression toward the gang. Many cities are trying to combat this dilemma, as in washing and whiting out these tags.

Several years ago, Richard M. Daley, the mayor of Chicago, created the "Graffiti Blasters" for the elimination of graffiti and vandalism that is associated with gang activity. The city had also put an end to selling spray paint. However, it was still sold in the surrounding suburbs. Many people thought that it was a bad idea because it these vandals wanted to deface property, then they had the opportunity to travel to the suburbs to purchase the spray paint.

Some supporters of graffiti see it as a positive way of utilizing public space and/or promote his/her creative abilities. There are others that think of it as an undesirable headache and as a very costly form of vandalism that requires much property rehabilitation.

We can look at graffiti with two perspectives: as a form of art exhibition that has meaning, as in a mural. At the same time, it can be viewed as a community nuisance that will cause crime to become increased. In other words, it depends on the beholder.

Source:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graffiti

Published by Bettina R. Smith

Bettina is a web content writer that writes on everything ranging from everyday life to pop culture. She is now focusing more on her pet industry writing and pet copywriting.   View profile

3 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Madsoaper 2/22/2011

    I am not sure why this is a question. The artist(s) may be as gifted and expressive as Michelangelo and Picasso, but if the surface, the canvas is not theirs (i.e., no permission or ownership), then it is vandalism.

  • memmay151 9/5/2008

    I thought of it as art until it appeared in my neighborhood.

  • Jennifer Metz 9/4/2008

    Interesting read!

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.