Groups Boycott Tropic Thunder as Offensive to Developmentally Disabled

Hollywood and the Rights of the Disabled

Katherine Anderson
According to Patricia Bauer on her Disability News Web site, the new Ben Stiller flick, Tropic Thunder, contains a scene that can be considered "hate speech" directed toward individuals with developmental disabilities. Why? Because it makes prolific use of the word "retard."

From what I can gather from a transcript of the scene, Ben Stiller's character is discussing with Robert Downey Jr.'s character a failed movie attempt from his past where he played a character named Simple Jack, who is obviously just that: simple. Downey tells Stiller that the reason his movie failed was that he went "full retard" as opposed to just acting slow like Dustin Hoffman in Rainman or Tom Hanks in Forrest Gump. This afternoon the forums on SPEDWatch of Massachusetts lit up with suggestions of demonstrations and boycotts. NPR News ran the story once Timothy Shriver, chairman of the Special Olympics threw his hat in the ring to encourage anyone who supports individuals with special needs to boycott the film.

Now, being a Special Education teacher of students with moderate to severe special needs, I spend a lot of my time with children who have a range of developmental delays up to and including Down's Syndrome which is the most widely recognized developmental disability, marked by unique facial features that make it easy to spot. While I would never allow any of my students to use the word "retard" while speaking of themselves or others, the word has been around since 1895 (according to Webster's Dictionary) and is as widely used as the many variations of the "N" word. Hollywood has been producing characters with developmental disabilities for years and Tropic Thunder is no different. In fact, the movie is actually making fun of Hollywood's tendency to reach laughable heights when filming a movie. So it raises the question of whether or not the actions of these special interest groups borders on the suggestion of censorship.

After reading the transcript of the scene in question, I have to wonder how other movies that have openly mocked individuals with disabilities have managed to slip under the radar. How did we not get incensed over Johnny Knoxville's portrayal of a developmentally disabled individual in The Ringer? Not only did he act "retarded" but the entire plot of the movie follows his attempts to crash the Special Olympics! Is it simply because there wasn't an open use of the "R" word? Was it because he didn't wear overalls and false teeth like Ben Stiller does in Tropic Thunder?

The other question that begs asking is, does protesting or boycotting the film send the right message? Indeed our society really hasn't come that far in the treatment of individuals with developmental disabilities but neither has it come that far in the treatment of minorities, homosexuals, and women. However, one rarely sees the boycotting of a movie that openly makes fun of gay men, uses the "N" word, or objectifies women because we believe in the freedom of speech and the freedom of creativity, of artistic license. Everyone who goes to see a film written by Ben Stiller expects to be offended at some point in the movie but the American movie going public knows to take it all with a grain of salt. They don't protest, they don't boycott. They may groan or roll their eyes when a particular joke or scene strikes a chord, but they don't call for censorship.

In the meantime, while we are busy boycotting Tropic Thunder, what happens to the rest of the issues that should be on the front burner? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I just signed my new contract today and school starts in a few weeks. That means new education plans, evaluations, referrals. Aren't our students and children much more important than a movie that we can choose to view or not? And to further that thought, shouldn't we see the movie before we pass judgment? Working with Special Education students, our message is one of tolerance and open mindedness. Let's practice these virtues before we attack Ben Stiller and his occasionally inappropriate sense of humor. And Patricia Bauer, I actually still find fart humor rather funny.

Published by Katherine Anderson

I am a professional photographer, mental health and architectural historian, and a special education teacher.  View profile

11 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Flu-Bird12/18/2008

    Just look at that awful movie BUBBLE BOY from DISNEY i mean those persons born with that malady deserves our help and not part of some putrid tasteless comedy

  • Jillita Horton10/30/2008

    "The Ringer" was actually viewed ahead of time and endorsed by some kind of Special Olympics committee, or something like that, that was tied to the Special Olympics.

  • Good Review8/22/2008

    I found your review full of excellent information and you pointed out your argument very well. I also wrote about how bad "Tropic Thunder" was and I encourage people not to see it. There are other better, less offensive comedies that people can watch.

  • Bryan Belrad8/21/2008

    What's this, then? We should practice the tolerance we preach, you say? Heavens, no - intolerant points of view are absolutely intolerable, and are not to be tolerated under any circumstances. Except that one, of course, because it is intolerant of intolerance, which is ok. Really, it isn't hypocritical, really, because, um, it's like a double negative. Really. Intolerance of intolerance is really tolerance, see. You should try it before you knock it. Wait - no - never mind. You should never learn things before passing judgement. That might lead you to tolerate things you're supposed to think are hateful and ignorant and intolerant. And no thinking, either, now that you mention it. Thinking leads to dissent, which is the same as being intolerant. We have to hate hate, or else we'll be consumed by all the hate out there. That's the only way to keep from being hateful and ignorant and intolerant. Yup.

  • Katherine Anderson8/21/2008

    Thank you all for your comments. I think the people who react negatively to my article tend to forget that I am a Special Education Teacher. I've written the history of institutional reform in New England. I'm well aware of the evolution of special needs and how far we still have to go. However, the rest of you are correct that while media certainly has an influence on society, it's the members of society who bear the responsibility for responsible viewing and such. I know that it's not a cut and dry discussion and never will be but I'm suggesting that people stand down and remember that Hollywood is forever evolving and boycotting this film is a waste of time. See it, don't see it. You never know!

  • Jill V8/21/2008

    While entertainment does have a big impact on our society, the problem is not with the movies, it's with the people in the "real world" who choose to treat others badly. I agree with Katherine - you should see the movie first before you start complaining about it. And if you don't like something, avoid it. She also pointed out that the point of this scene was to make fun of the sensationalism in Hollywood, not a certain group of people. Great article!

  • Amanda Pampena8/21/2008

    Interesting article! I didn't particularly care for the "retard" scene...it was extremely insensitive, but I still liked the movie....Robert Downey Jr was great in it!

  • Steve Thompson8/21/2008

    By the way, Katherine, great job on the article.

  • Steve Thompson8/21/2008

    Lauren, it's the people that take them too seriously who do the damage. If you watch a movie with the knowledge that it isn't real, that the actors don't necessarily believe what they're saying, then how does it cause any harm? And, as Ms. Anderson pointed out, advocacy groups tend to pick on one movie or book or song or television show while hundreds of others slip through the cracks. If you ask me, it's all ridiculous.

  • Lauren Vork8/19/2008

    Lori, "only a movie"? Read a little history! Movies, books, television, plays, operas, etc., have always had a tremendous impact on how people think and upon the shape of society, culture, and politics. It's unwise to dismiss them so flippantly.

Displaying Comments
Next »

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.