Gun Control: Why Taking Guns Away Won't Work
Gun Control Policies Are Necessary but Preserving the Right to Bear Arms is Crucial
The supporters of gun eradication feel this is the best policy for stopping gun related crimes because it will keep guns out of everyone's hands, including criminals. I completely disagree. There are several problems with this idea. First, criminals always find a way to get what they want. Drugs such as cocaine and heroin have been outlawed for decades and it hasn't stopped criminals from getting a hold of them. Guns would be no different. The gun laws in effect today prevent felons from purchasing a firearm but countless felons still have them. They steal guns or buy them on the black market, much like drugs. Crimes have even been committed using stolen military issue weaponry. So outlawing guns all together will not keep the criminals with their minds set on acquiring a gun from doing so.
The other problem with a policy that outlaws guns is that it would take away the ability of law abiding citizens to protect themselves and their families. I keep a gun in my home to protect myself and my family, as do many other families in the United States. By losing my right to own a gun I would be losing my family's best line of defense against an intruder. Some would argue that it is the job of the police to protect us from criminals and not up to us to arm ourselves in defense. But the police aren't everywhere at all times. Having a gun in your home could mean the difference between the police responding to an attempted burglary or investigating a home invasion and/or homicide of you or your loved ones. Don't get me wrong, I wish I didn't need a firearm to protect my family and I hope I never have to use it. If nobody else had guns I wouldn't either. But as I said earlier the criminals will always find a way to get firearms, legal or not. So by taking away everyone's right to own guns it would really only keep them out of the hands of law abiding citizens. This would just make it easier for criminals to victimize innocent people.
The other main argument made for the outlawing of guns is the elimination of gun related accidents. There are many accidental deaths and injuries from guns in this country every year. Eliminating guns to solve this problem is a drastic solution though. People are injured and killed in automobiles every day but we don't outlaw cars. The auto manufacturers implement new safety features and laws are passed to promote safer driving. This is because it's not the cars themselves killing people, it's the people operating them improperly that cause the accidents. The same is true with firearms. A more realistic solution to firearm accidents is safety features on the guns and education on safe operation. Gun manufacturers have already been adding safety features to firearms for years and new innovations in safety features hit the market all the time. That combined with increased public education on safe firearm handling and operation would make a suitable alternative to eliminating guns completely in an effort to decrease gun accidents.
While I understand that gun crimes and accidents are a major problem in this country and agree that something needs to be done, I don't think taking away our right to gun ownership will solve anything. I think we are on the right track today with the laws limiting who can purchase and own firearms. The best thing the government could do is review these laws and refine them to limit, as much as possible, the criminal element from acquiring firearms and increase penalties for those who break gun laws without taking away the gun rights of the law abiding citizen. The best thing we as citizens could do is continue to educate ourselves and others on gun safety to help prevent accidents as well as educate ourselves on firearm defense so that we can effectively use our gun ownership rights to help prevent the misuse of firearms. After all, guns don't kill people by themselves; It takes a person to pull the trigger.
Published by M. McGimpsey
M. McGimpsey is a professional kickboxer and martial arts instructor. Currently residing in the midwest, he runs a gym and teaches full-time and competes in kickboxing part-time. View profile
- Should a Citizen Accused of Domestic Abuse Lose the Right to Bear Arms?Being accused and being convicted are two very different things. An individual convicted of domestic abuse should not have easy access to firearms of any kind.
- The Right to Bear Arms ResponsiblyA look at how major cities such as Washington D.C. can control weapons in their cities
- The National Rifle Association: The Right to Bear ArmsThis right to own and carry firearms is particularly upheld by the National Rifle Association (NRA), a non-profit organization that promotes the sport of marksmanship as well as the right to personal protection.
- The Right to Bear Arms and Common SenseDoes the Second Amendment still apply? Sould every ciizen be legally permitted to own a gun? My opinion explores the issue and injects a common sense approach to our constitutional right.
- You Have the Right to Bend OverPeople like Paul Revere and Theodore Roosevelt would despise todays sissies. The people of this country still have the right to vote until you voluntarily surrender your right to bear arms.
- Barak Obama's Gun Control Positions
- Gun Control or Just Chicken?
- The Republican Presidential Candidates Positions on Gun Control
- Gun Control is Simple: Less Guns, Less Crime
- Modern Day Gun Control in America: The Bill of Rights and the Right to Bear Arms
- On Warren E. Burger's "The Right to Bear Arms"
- Second Amendment's Right to Bear Arms Requires Re-examination




3 Comments
Post a CommentPete,
I agree. I've always said I would not carry/own a firearm if I knew no one else had one stashed in their waistband. A world devoid of weapons would be nice. So would a peaceful utopia with abundant resources where we all coexist in harmony. Unfortunately they're both impossible. We'll always have wars and we'll always have criminals with guns looking to harm others. Unless that miraculously changes I plan on defending my family from such people by any means necessary within the boundaries of the law. By the way, local, state and federal gun ownership eligibility laws define what it is to be a citizen able to legally own a gun so thats where we draw the line for "law-abiding citizen".
You, make a couple good points. But, as I tell everyone with this narrow-minded viewpoint, where do you draw the line with "law-abiding citizen"?? Who gets to have a gun and who doesn't? Aren't we all emotional, and irrational creatures? The human race would be much better off without guns and other instantaneous weapons. Eliminate them from existence!
Good info!