Guns Allowed on Amtrak Trains Beginning Dec. 15

The New Rules Mimics Air Travel Requirements

Carol Bengle Gilbert
A surprising counter-trend in travel is unfolding due to lobbying by the National Rifle Association. With the massive security apparatus designed to keep guns off airplanes, some travelers may be caught off guard when they find out that beginning Dec.15, gun owners may bring their weapons on Amtrak trains with checked baggage service.

According to Associated Press, rail cars are being retrofitted with gun storage lockers to accommodate the new rules. Gun owners will be required to give Amtrak 24 hours notice of their intention to travel with a gun, unload the gun and pack it in a locked, hard case. During travel, the gun will be stored in a gun locker.

The gun lobby spent millions lobbying for this change in law, $2.1 million in the first half of 2009 alone.

The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence opposes the change, noting that it will make it easier for terrorists to bring guns on trains with the intent to do harm.

While the new rule runs counter to ever-more-restrictive baggage trends, it is consistent with the rules governing guns in checked airline baggage. With airline baggage, however, it is the individual air carriers that set policy, determining whether any guns are allowed or special fees apply. Guns transported in airline checked baggage must be unloaded and secured in a locked, hard-sided case, just as the new train rules require. For both air and train travel, the traveler checking the gun must remain in sole possession of the key during travel. Ammunition must remain in manufacturer packaging and also must be checked.

Is this policy likely to create risk for fellow travelers? It's hard to say, but one point worthy of noting is that gun owners who fail to comply with all of Amtrak's new policy will be denied boarding. Is boarding denial going to anger some gun owner enough that he uses his gun in the train station to protest? Denied boarding for failure to comply could result from not making advance arrangements or from failing to properly secure the gun and ammunition. Unsecured guns and ammunition in the hands of an angry gun owner in a crowded train station could be unsettling at best and potentially lethal.

But if the experience of the airlines is an indicator, violations of weapons restrictions though frequent is usually harmless. Violations typically result from gun owners with no nefarious intentions forgetting to unload a gun before placing it in checked baggage or to remove a gun from a carry-on bag before boarding.

Published by Carol Bengle Gilbert - Featured Contributor in Travel

2010 Yahoo! Outstanding Contributor of the Year, Carol has consistently been designated a Top 100 Yahoo! Contributor Network writer. She received a 2008 People's Media Award for "Best Article." Carol’s pr...  View profile

14 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Linda StCyr12/11/2010

    Most legal gun owners are not violent people. I'm a little offended that this seems to be implied with the statement, "Is boarding denial going to anger some gun owner enough that he uses his gun in the train station to protest?" Hell, I've been described as a peace loving hippie but I'm also a gun owner. I highly doubt this will make it easier for terrorists to pull off plots on planes or trains. Terrorists will find a way to cause unrest whether or not legal gun owners carry guns or don't carry guns (or have them packed away so you can't even see them). Terrorist are just that, Terrorists. Comparing legal, law abiding citizens who own guns to terrorists is unfair and unjust.

  • Tamara McRill12/7/2010

    Not sure how I feel about this. The safety precautions *sound* fine, but we took Amtrak to New Orleans in January and every time I passed checked bagged, employees were absent. That's the suitcases stored at the front of the cars and what looked like a separate downstairs car full. Door was open and no one was in there. Hope the gun lockers are more guarded.

  • Anne Stjern12/4/2010

    No, No, No. This makes absolutely zero sense. Apparently the gun lobby has never watched a Jesse James movie. Guns and trains don't mix.

  • Orchiolum12/4/2010

    Unlike airplanes, a group of passengers could easily overcome Amtrack employees, stop the train anywhere along the track in heavily populated areas, grab the guns and load them. Allowing just the gun, without ammunition (which could be purchased upon arrival), makes better sense to me.

  • Zagnut12/4/2010

    All panicky anti-gun zealots please calm down. If you read the article--if not the law--the guns transported must be in a locked, hard case and the owner must be the only one in possession of the key, and most importantly, the encased gun will be locked up by Amtrak's staff. Nobody's going to be able to get to it and start blasting, so unbunch your Fruit of the Looms. All the NRA reversed was the total ban on transporting guns on Amtrak. They supported the security measures of locking it away and storing it in an airline-approved case. Previously, if someone wanted to travel Amtrak to hunt, compete, or relocate, they had to ship their gun separately. Now they can keep in in their (nominal) custody. Calm down, kids. It's okay.

  • Maria Roth12/2/2010

    I didn't realize it was common to travel with one's guns. Can I travel in a separate, gun-free car?

  • Heather White12/2/2010

    No way! horrible :( thank you for the update

  • Sherri Granato12/2/2010

    Interesting news, and who would have thunk it?

  • Jo Ann Wentzel12/2/2010

    Interesting. Thanks for the info.

  • Eric Hetvile12/2/2010

    I think terrorists will leave Amtrak alone. I would guess they'd want to target more than 3 people at a time.

Displaying Comments
Next »

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.