They use the argument that restrictions on guns means only the criminal elements will have guns seems at odds with their support of individuals who are not licensed arms dealers being able to sell weapons without checking to determine if the purchaser is legally entitled. Apparently, protection of the right of someone to have a basement filled with all manner of weapon trumps the protection of society's right to be free from the fear of firearms' violence.
The state of Virginia is already the 'wild west' of the northeast. No permits or licenses are required to purchase or own a gun here, and if you have a permit, there are very few limitations on carrying a concealed weapon. If your intent is aggressive or offensive, you can't own a machine gun in Virginia, but if you can prove lack of such intent, you're only required to notify the police and register your machine gun within 24 hours.
With a population of some 7.5 million people, in 2005 Virginia ranked number 18 in handgun deaths in the United States. There're approximately 5.23 homicides per 100,000, and 69.4% of those homicides are handgun related. In the U.S., handgun homicides accounted for nearly all the increase in homicides from 1985 to 1993, while deaths from other causes declined. A 2002 survey indicated that 38% of households in Virginia had guns in or around the home, and 1 in 6 were unlocked and unloaded. In 2004, firearms accounted for 73% of Virginia's homicides. Firearms related deaths exceed automobile crash related deaths in many states - in 1991, this was the case in Virginia.
What is all this leading to, you might ask? I think it is long past time for us to reconsider our love affair with guns and violence and come into the 21st century. The 'right to bear arms' clause of our Constitution was written in a time when there was no standing army, very little in the way of professional police forces, and a largely rural population. I cannot imagine that the founding fathers could have envisioned assault rifles either. It is instructive to read the entire amendment: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." If this is to be interpreted literally, as the NRA often maintains, it means the Federal Government cannot prevent anyone from buying and carrying a weapon at any time or in any place. Of course, the states are not so restricted, and that is where NRA puts its lobbying efforts.
I would offer a scenario for those who would argue that having a lot of armed people in a public place contributes to security and safety. Imagine you're sitting in a crowded restaurant, and the majority of the patrons are armed - duly licensed to carry concealed weapons. Some idiot does something, or perhaps a car backfires - any number of anxiety provoking incidents - and everyone reaches for his or her 'piece.' Would you want to be a diner in that situation? Does that picture make you feel safe and secure? If it does, then you should be a member of the NRA. If, on the other hand, it scares the holy crud out of you, you should join the rest of us.
Reference:
http://www.nraila.org/legislation/federal/read.aspx?id=522
http://crime.about.com/od/gunlaswbystate/a/gunlaws_va.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_violence_in_the_United_States
http://www.vahealth.org/injury/topics/gunsafety/index.htm
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00023655.htm
http://www.healthsystem.virginia.edu/uvahealth/peds_safety/frarmhub.cfm
Published by Charles Ray - Featured Contributor in Travel
I ve been a free lance writer since the late 1960s. I have also published two books on leadership, Things I Learned From My Grandmother about Leadership and Life, and Taking Charge. For the next two years,... View profile
- The National Rifle Association: The Right to Bear ArmsThis right to own and carry firearms is particularly upheld by the National Rifle Association (NRA), a non-profit organization that promotes the sport of marksmanship as well as the right to personal protection.
Pandering to the National Rifle AssociationJohn McCain says he is writing a bill to make guns legal in National Parks. School and shopping mall shootings are not enough? We need more?- Gun Control in the Near FutureProvides several brief examples in history of measures attempting to limit access to firearms and looks at the kind of gun control measures that can be expected from the Obama administration.
- Gun Control in an Economically and Socially Troubled American Society: Turning the...An essay on the ineffectiveness of gun control.
- Who's Your Teacher? the National Rifle AssocationGun Control. Let's give teachers guns. How about, let's not.
- The National Rifle Association (NRA) as an Untouchable Special Interest
- Barak Obama's Gun Control Positions
- Gun Control: Law vs Rights
- Gun Control is Necessary
- Gun Control: Why Taking Guns Away Won't Work
- Balance of Power by Richard North Patterson: Gun Rights vs Control
- Product Review: ColdHeat Glue Gun for Crafts Woodworkers and Repairs




1 Comments
Post a CommentGuns don't kill... I hate it but I am firm on right to bear arms.