Headlines that proclaim "America" or "Americans" believe or do thus and such. America is comprised of North, Central and South America. It is understood that these "America" headlines are referring to the citizens of United States of America. The citizens of the USA are a diverse group of individuals. There is no "America" or "Americans" so that the headline itself is a misrepresntation of facts. Before I read beyond the title, I assume the piece will be a biased account filled with half-truths and often, outright lies to further whatever claim the author is choosing to promote. Using the word "Some" with the word "Americans" would give the piece authenticity.
Other headlines that irk me are the ones that shout "A New Survey, Study or Poll Proves Thus and Such". A small sampling of people surveyed or polled proves that a small sampling of people think one way or another. They are also worded to give the results the pollster is hoping to obtain. A quick example: the poll asks "Would you vote for Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama?" but does not give an option of "neither". The resultant headline, depending upon answers, would say: "Poll Shows Clinton Favored Over Obama" when actually some that took the survey plan to vote for Ron Paul or John Edwards.
The same is true of studies, even the scientific ones. Surely rats in a controlled environment and injected with chemicals will show a result. To translate that result to actual living conditions among human beings is just darn silly. One such study was capturing air, to test quality. This proved the amounts of dangerous cancer producing tobacco related chemicals could cause lung cancer. The study ignores a simple common sense thing: air is not static. Those chemicals disappear rather quickly; most likely more quickly than the carbon monoxide fumes from a bus. Again, when I see "polls, survey and studies" headlines, I know the article will be a biased piece used to spread falsehoods and the author's point of view.
Ditto headlines that proclaim "Pundits or experts say" or offer the "best" or "worst" advice on any given topic. To which I often think: "You don't say, eh."
Headlines that irk me use words like "Suck". What kind of a word is that? When an author uses it, s/he means s/he does not approve or like something and is simply expressing their position. They can be fun articles to read if one agrees with the opinion of the author, but their main existence is to alienate people. When I see such headlines, I think the author is combative, wants to start wars and is not interested in creating harmony and peace on earth. They are usually petty annoyances, kind of like this article. Educated people usually have more tolerance of other human beings, knowing that most people are doing the best they can do considering the circumstances of their lives at any given time.
False and misleading headlines irk me. One Associated Content headline stated: "Britney Is Dead". The author meant her musical career was dead. It was an opinion piece and the kind of headline one expects to find on a tabloid magazine. Often something a public figure has said or done is sensationalized in a headline. The article will support whatever biased opinion the writer is trying to spread to readers, even though what was placed in the headline was taken out of context of whatever was said and done. Many people will simply believe what is written and form a false impression based on misleading content.
Cosmopolitan magazine was often guilty of other kinds of headlines that irk me. The story or article has absolutely nothing to do with the headline. When I choose to read something due to the headline, I am interested in the subject. I expect the related story to "answer the headline". It is a disappointment waste of time reading the whole article without finding any info relating to the headline.
Headlines that use the word "Liberal" irk me for the same reason headlines that use the word "Americans" irks me. The piece attached to the headline is usually another fine example of people bashing and bias with little to back up whatever claim the author is trying to make. The same can be true of headlines that shout: "Black America" or "White America" or "Muslim" anything which is usually accompanied by the word "Terrorist". Labels placed upon people are quite often fables. People are individuals. Strip away labels and we are all the same. We have hearts, livers, kidneys, a need for shelter, to be loved and to love in return. We think alike. We think differently.
The headlines that irk me the most are the ones that insist I feel, think or believe something that is absolutely not the truth. What are the headlines that irk you?
Published by Alyce Rocco
- Nigella Lawson: Mini Biography of the Author of How to EatNigella Lucy Lawson was born on January 6, 1960, to Nigel Lawson and Vanessa Salmon. She is known as the author of How to Eat, and How to Be a Domestic Goddess. But Nigella Lawson's life has not always been carefree;...
The Author of Sanctification - the TrinityThe Trinity - the author of sanctification.- Katharine Kerr -- the Author as Celtic ScholarThis is one of the articles Sandra and I wrote about Katharine Kerr; when we were working as fine arts journalists we did a series of interviews with Kerr, and became friends.
- The Social Nature of Human BeingsThis article is about the social nature of human beings in the work place.
- Human Beings: The Bearers of Memetic ThemesHuman Beings: The Bearers of Memetic Themes
- Why Americans Are Their Own Worst Enemies
- Tips for Advertisement Headline Writing
- Argument in Favor of Genetic Engineering of Human Beings
- Human Beings Vis-a-vis Animal Beings
- Do Human Beings Have the Right to Offend?
- The Next Human Beings
- Human Beings Are Capable of Change Via External or Internal Impetus

21 Comments
Post a CommentYou know, your article touched a nerve with me. In a good way of course. The people who commented before me nicely summed up what I was thinking. Especially the annoyance at being constantly burdened with headlines that claim this is was 'everyone' wants to see or do.
Oh and on an unrelated note. A while back you commented one of my articles. I've been offline a while, so I finally am actually getting around to commenting back everyone I see that's commented me.
As to the nature of the beast known as 'fanfiction'. To clear that up.. it's a story derived from a pre-existing story that the author likes and wants to fiddle around with.
Some original authors detest fanfiction writers as hack plagurists. Other authors do not care. The authors I appreciate the most are the ones that actually want and like for people to write fanfiction about their works.
This always made sense to me because if someone spent all that time writing an entirely new story about something I wrote about
Thanks for the comments everyone. Roy, this article came directly from visiting AC's frontpage everyday. I read an AC article yesterday about a Princeton University study that shows or proves that we decide who to vote for within seconds of seeing a candidates face. There is so much important stuff to study or report about and it seemed every other showcased AC headline, were getting on my nerves.
These are definitely things to think about but since the masses are basically asleep, using buzz-wordy headlines help keep them asleep.
Headlines that irk me are those with spelling errors. I don't think I'm perfect by any means, but if a headline contains a misspelled word, I have to wonder how much time and care the writer took in writing and publishing the info. I have to wonder if they bothered to look at the finished piece at all. Others that irk me are the ones that are misleading. The one you mentioned is a good example. It's a clever but deceptive method of getting page views.
Great article! It is frustrating when a headline is misleading. But, I bet the "Britney is Dead" headline got a lot of clicks (perhaps undeservedly).
Ha ha...I struggle sooo much with trying to come up with titles and have tried to avoid most of the things you mention for the very same reasons. Good insight (and helpful!)
Great article! Will make me be more mindful of my headlines, though they usually get changed by the powers that be before they are published anyway....One in specific about an injury my dog received was retitled to indicate there was a dog fight, and there was none....
Nice article, I agree with many of your points.
Irk is going to be my "word" for today!
"Irk" was an excellent choice, even though you could have said "nauseate", "P.O.", or "make me go postal". "Irk" is rarely seen anymore and made this great article much more attention-getting because of the word. I too am annoyed by headlines that pretend to speak for "everyone", especially those for TV ratings. The "top shows" were only "top" among the people hooked up to Neilsen, not everyone in the country.