Hello Ron Paul or Goodbye Readers

How Newspapers Are Losing Credibility by Ignoring the Ron Paul Campaign

Alex Michel
Times are tough in the newspaper business. Newspapers are losing readers, and, increasingly, advertising dollars to new forms of media unique to the Internet.

Newspapers often defend their offerings against these upstart competitors by citing their editorial function. "The Internet is full of garbage," they say, "and our journalists and editors sort through all the junk for you and report the real story."

In the case of the Presidential Campaign of Congressman Ron Paul, however, newspapers appear to be missing or ignoring the real story, and undermining their credibility in the process.

Ron Paul is a 10-term U.S. Congressman seeking the Republican nomination for President, running on a platform of limited government.

As measured by activity on the Internet, he has generated more interest than any other Presidential candidate. His website gets far more traffic than that of any other candidate. He is the most searched-for candidate on Google. He has the most people connected to him on social networking websites.

His Internet support transfers into real world support. Ron Paul has won more straw polls around the country than any other Republican candidate. He has over 70,000 grassroots volunteers. His poll numbers have gained steadily, and he now polls consistently in the high single digits in spite of polling bias against his younger supporters with cellular phones instead of landlines and against his Independent supporters who did not vote in the 2004 Republican primaries.

His fundraising momentum has been dramatic. On November 5th, he set the record for most money ever raised in a single day by a Republican candidate for President-more money than George W. Bush or Ronald Reagan ever raised in a single day. He is tracking to be the leading Republican fundraiser for the fourth quarter of the year. And since average donation sizes to the Ron Paul campaign are smaller, he outpaces all the other Republican candidates dramatically in terms of the actual number of people who have donated to his campaign.

And yet newspapers cover him only grudgingly. The recent news about Ron Paul raising more money in the first two months of the fourth quarter than Romney and Giuliani raised in the entire third quarter was utterly ignored by the every major local and national newspaper. These same newspapers run multiple stories every day detailing the latest statements from candidates like McCain, Thompson, and Huckabee, all of whom are similarly "long-shots" behind Giuliani and Romney and none of whom are experiencing anything like Ron Paul's momentum in fundraising and grassroots support.

The press says that it wants to focus on the issues, not the horserace. When it comes to the issues, one would think that Ron Paul would be a favorite topic in the press. He is the only Republican candidate who wants to bring the troops home to defend America in a country where 70% of the people are against the war. He is the only Republican candidate who backs up his claims to be fiscally conservative with a plan for actual spending cuts. And he is the only Republican candidate who voted against the Patriot Act in an era when many Americans are worried about government spying and torture. And interviewing Ron Paul is a journalist's dream-he will answer any question without the spin, caution, or evasion so common in the other candidates.

So why do newspapers ignore Ron Paul? There are many theories, ranging from bias to laziness to a desire to "call" the election in advance. It's hard to say.

But one thing is for sure. Ignoring Ron Paul is self-destructive for newspapers. Ron Paul has millions of supporters. They are young, high-income, politically involved, and Internet-savvy; exactly the types of readers newspapers should be courting in a time of declining and aging readership.

But these important news consumers are being told by the newspapers that their huge grassroots political campaign doesn't really exist. Every day that the newspapers ignore Ron Paul and his supporters and cover McCain, Thompson, and Huckabee instead, more of these news consumers lose faith in newspapers as reliable news sources. They defect from traditional newspapers and commit to getting their news elsewhere. By ignoring some of the most engaged and desirable media consumers out there, newspapers are alienating readers and hastening their own decline in relevance.

Published by Alex Michel

Alex Michel  View profile

7 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Pam Lacoy2/15/2012

    The mass media has dug its own GRAVE, lets bury them deep! They are corrupt, dishonest, worthless and dirty and low. Do you know that the new is badly misreported regarding Middle East as is Ron Paul? I can tell you it is just as bad, which is to say the news is so pitifully one sided to favor Pro Israeli ideals and thoughts. Its a war on truth there just like Ron Paul is. Lets all cancel our news rags and get higher speed Internet, so we can use streaming media for news and get it from all over the world.

  • LarrWayne Po7/19/2011

    The Mexican mafia would not prosper so well, if Americans could grow hemp in states of choice.

  • LarrWayne12/28/2010

    There might be a lot less ignorant people, if so many were not brainwashed into listening only to news channels, that slant heavily to one side of issues. Voters, that vote with their eyes closed, like to hear news, that tells them how smart they were. Liberal Dems and liberal Repubs, call Ron Paul liberal, because he is not as liberal as they are. Many politicians talk in circles to please the rich.

  • samara young2/27/2008

    Also could they be ignoring doctor Paul becaus he speaks the truth???

  • samara young2/27/2008

    Your article was very reassuring for me. Thanks for that!!!!!!!!

  • Alyce Rocco1/4/2008

    I say that because his wife may not have needed a business license to start a dance school in the basement back then, but today even a homeless person needs a business license to sell street newspapers. Gangbangers do have blogs. They are in agreement with Paul that the war on drugs is a failure. But for the victims of the Mexican Mafia the war on drugs needs to be increased to prevent senseless killings. What does he propose to do about that, he never mentions. too busy minting coins in his likeness. He may as much as a malignant narcissist as our current Pres. Rather than whining "they are out to get me" perhaps he should try to address what we, the people need.

  • Alyce Rocco1/4/2008

    I love the internet. Makes it easier to gather info from diverse sources. If Ron Paul were elected and abolished the illegal federal income tax, who does he propose will pay his salary? Ron Paul is a Libertarian and I do not support their party's platform, because they seem to think females are not to be afforded the same right to "liberty" which means freedom of choice as men. I like Paul because he is one of the few who voted no to the Patriot Act. I do not like him because he inspires hatred of everything not him among his supporters. The office of President is to serve the people and he is too much like the rest "Thou Shalt Honor Ron Paul". I would love to see him bring his messages to, oh, someplace like Compton, California and then he might show he is in touch with problems facing all citizens in todays US of A. The 50's are history.

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.