The figures for smokers, though, remains much higher, with current smokers being 10 to 30 times more likely to get lung cancer than people who have never smoked.
The study, done by researchers at Stanford University School of Medicine and the Northern California Cancer Center, will be published in the February 10th issue of the Journal of Clinical Oncology. The researchers analyzed data that tracked the incidence in lung cancer in over a million people in the United States and Sweden.
Ellen Chang, ScD, co-author of the study, said she thought it was likely that many of the cases of lung cancer in those who never smoked could be attributed to second-hand smoke. That might also explain some of the gender differences that the study found. Because more men smoke than women, women may be more likely to be exposed to second-hand smoke.
Lead author Heather Wakelee, MD, said that some environmental pollutants, including asbestos, chromium, arsenic and radon, are also believed to cause lung cancer in people who have never smoked, but that hasn't been conclusively proven. More research is needed. Eventually, doctors will be able to understand how the cancer works on a molecular level, which, she hopes, will lead to the discovery of new treatments.
Dr. Wakelee also hopes that the studies will help to lessen the stigma associated with lung cancer. "I have a lot of patients who have never smoked," she said. "And because of the stigma, people are embarrassed to speak out about their disease. They feel like as soon as they say they have lung cancer, everyone judges them."
The stigma affects not only patients, but also funding and other support for research, Dr. Wakelee said. Although more than 180,000 Americans are diagnosed with lung cancer every year, and although lung cancer kills more patients than breast, colon and prostate cancers combined, it does not have the visible support that some other diseases do. Dr. Wakelee says she hopes that some day the symbol for lung cancer support -- a clear ribbon -- will be easily recognized.
Chang said that "non-smoking-associated lung cancer is an increasingly important issue even if only because the population of never-smokers is growing."
Sources
Many lung cancer cases in nonsmokers: study, by Maggie Fox, Feb. 9, 2007, Reuters
Lung Cancer Rates Higher Among Female Non-Smokers Than Previously Thought, Stanford Study Shows, Feb. 8, 2007, Business Wire press release
Published by May Monten
Syndicated entertainment writer and serial blogger. View profile
- Chlorinated Waters and Lung HealthChlorine is commonly used to disinfect drinking water and other water sources. However,exposure to this powerful chemical has been shown to impair lung function. This article describes the disinfection process, the b...
- Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Use of Pemetrexed in Lung Cancer Treatment When suffering with the lung cancer or malignancy known as MPM, ask your doctor about the latest advances in treatment including the use of Pemetrexed.
Lung Cancer, "Smoker's Guilt" & the Psychological ImpactFor patients who suffer from lung cancer, the psychological impact can be as significant as the physical impact.- Lung Cancer - New Diagnostic TestsLungs inhale oxygen sustain live to the tissues & exhale carbon dioxide. Lung Cancer is the number one cancer killer & mostly attributed to smoking. Breath Test detects early lung cancer & genetic test evaluates if ch...
- Top High Chairs for Under $100The top three high chairs under $100 are the Kolcraft Recline 'n Dine Deluxe, the Graco Harmony high chair, and the Fisher Price Healthy Care high chair.
- Secondhand Smoke Lowers Teen's Test Scores
- The Effects of Second Hand Smoke
- Should You Get Screened for Lung Cancer, Even If You Are a Nonsmoker?
- Kids Chewing Mothballs to Get High
- Presbycusis; An Examination of High Frequency Hearing Loss & Impact on Society
- Spirited and High Needs Children
- High Gloss Wood Finishes : How to Care for and Maintain the Finish on Your Piano



