Earlier this month former Santa Rosa high-school student Rebekah Rice finally spoke out in court about things being gay.
Five years ago, the then 14-year old was taunted for her Mormon upbringing when fellow classmates asked her if she had (like) ten moms. Drawing on the cool lingo of the day, Rice retorted, "That's so gay."
Evidently this phrase landed her smack dab in the middle of a high-stakes lawsuit, in which school officials claim that such language harms the fragile foundation of gay-rights. Arguing that gay students need more protection than, say, a young girl getting ganged up on by a cohort of anti-Mormon mongrels, lawyers for the school have proposed a ban on the expression: "The district has a statutory duty to protect gay students from harassment . . . prohibition of the phrase 'That's so gay' ... was a reasonable regulation."
What's next? Will we get sued for calling obese people fat, or for laughing at dumb blonde jokes? Will the heterosexuals have to pay reparations to all the eons of emotional suffering our great-great-great grannies and granddads inflicted on the in-the-closet population?
Well, I want my scholarship for Canadian-Americans with green eyes and crooked teeth, dammit. And some financial payback for all the ancestral single women who've given birth over the millennia and never received one red cent of child support! I mean, where are all my vertically challenged, dirty blonde headed, freckle-eared, had chicken pox once reparations?
Well, too bad for me: I just wasn't born with a skin color or behavioral tendency that the government recognizes or rewards.
But back to the real children.
We all know that kids can be cruel. And a lot of the time, they have no idea why. They pick up words that adults throw around nonchalantly, like dogs licking up scraps under a dining table. The context often gets lost in the translation from the literal to the expressive, and novice tongues do not discriminate on the basis of tastefulness - or lack thereof.
How can we expect children to behave when we are the ones setting the standard? We are the audience that tunes into the bizarre-o world of Hollywood misfits; the adults are the ratings boosters that encourage the media and marketers to regurgitate the same smut and small-minded gibberish that we tell our kids is "bad behavior." But have we learned nothing from our own youth? We knew everything back then, especially when we weren't supposed to; trying to keep kids away from "adult only" only makes them want to dabble in the dark side all the more.
Now I understand that slander and bigotry is an ugly beast. No one likes being teased for things that they cannot help - things that they are born with. Racial and/or gender slurs only strengthen the stupidity and ignorance that people like Borat point and laugh at. Do we want the whole world to laugh at us because we're so undisciplined with our words that we actually make them illegal?
We are a country born on the basis of freedom, namely, freedom of speech. But with freedom comes great responsibility, or as Nietzsche put it: "Freedom is the will to be responsible to ourselves." Having a choice means being able to make the wisest, most beneficial of them, or to make the meanest, most harmful one. You can use your words to improve society, or you can use them to incur hate and shame - it's your choice.
But the more people that choose to abuse their freedom with "skinist" or sexist slurs, the more stupid laws we as taxpayers pay to implement, or pay to break. It's like that kid in grade school that cut class with the bathroom pass and forced everyone else to wait until recess. Essentially, the idiot that can't use his or her freedom responsibly is the one who makes everyone pay. And freedom should remain free, don't you agree?
This mania to censor everything not "politically correct" is getting out of control. To ban a phrase because it makes people sensitive is uncomfortably close to fascist fanaticism, and if it is enacted into law, we might as well get a head start on burning our books. Yet, there must be some agreement on the appropriateness of certain kinds of language if our vastly different cultural/familial/religious/sexual oriented ideologies are to work together. I'm pretty sure that if we talked openly about the effects of mean-spirited words, the allure of these phrases would diminish. But it has got to take place on all spectrums - adults cannot claim exclusivity on expletives unless they expect children to eagerly use them as soon as mommy and daddy leave the playground. And similarly, if black people continue to refer to themselves with the infamous "n" word, then they should either get used to hearing it from everyone, or become the change they want to see in society.
If you don't agree, well sue me.
Published by jocelyn brady
Champion of word smithering. View profile
- Anti-Gay Name-Calling Harms Both Gay and Heterosexual Kids, Study FindsAnti-gay name-calling significantly impacts not only gay students, but heterosexual students too. Also known as verbal bullying, such name-calling results in higher levels of anxiety, depression and personal distress...
- Schools Remain Unsafe for Gay StudentsA new study released to coincide with National Coming Out Day shows that nearly a quarter of all lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered (LGBT) students do not feel safe at school.
- The Rise of Popular Christianity: What College Students ThinkChristianity is becoming more prevalent in America today, but not everyone is pleased. In this profile of college students, we hear different perspectives on the growing Christian movement and what it means to student...
- Anti-Gay Articles AboundWhile reading articles on AC about gays and homosexuality, I have found many great articles. I have also found many disturbing (and sometimes hilarious) anti-gay articles. I think these people really believe in what...
- Where the Path of Social Engineering Will Take the U.S.A review of cultural and news events that give indications of the social degradations and their results if left unchecked.
- Common Phrase, "That's so Gay" Creates a Courtroom Battle
- Gay Students Targeted in Schools
- Ramadan and Al-Fatiha Give Gay Muslims Two Reasons to Celebrate October
- Is it Right for Private or Religious Schools to Kick Out Gay Students?
- Dating Violence Bill in SC Excludes Gay Students
- Deadly Fun: The Choking Game and Bullying
- Terrorism in America: Jena6, Al Qaeda, the Klan
- we might as well get a head start on burning our books
- the idiot that can't use his or her freedom responsibly is the one who makes everyone pay
- Well, I want my scholarship for Canadian-Americans with green eyes and crooked teeth, dammit.


10 Comments
Post a Commentyea, thats pretty gay
thats so true, kids shouldn't really be saying "thats so gay" it does degrade gay people and makes them put there head down in shame and i aggree that the 'N' word should never be used to a black person. someone would get seriosly hurt. ive done damage to people like that. but anyways great artical.
You have a good view of how this types of things should be handled
using terms that are in certain contexts derogatory to homosexuals dont have anything do do with gay bashing when used out of that particular context.
I certainly don't think one should be sued for using this "gay" expression. As an OLD gay guy, I find the usage of the word curious. So, what does it really mean? It sounds like a word of criticism. I would think one wouldn't call someone fat in their face, nor would someone tell a blond joke, if there was a blond present, unless, of course, you knew them so very well as to not offend them. Or would you?
"Great-great-great grannies and grandads?" Unfortunately, there are still countless heinous abuses today against the out-of-the-closet homosexuals. Those in-the-closet are typically safe, unless, of course, they're perceived as being different, i.e. "gay."
I know I'm being "so gay" by writing this (I can visualize the eyerolls), but if you are using the word in a derogatory way around people that might be gay-those that probably have felt judged and oppressed, threatened and abused, isolated and bullied; I would think someone would be mature enough to realize that it prob
Brilliant! And outstanding, and rare, piece of insight on our lawsuit happy, overly sensitive so called politically correct society. Great job, there is hope!
Heather James -- LOL! My gramma worshed her clothes in the crick in Kentucky. Addressing the issue: kids are mean. It's a given. They are uncivilized humans. They can't learn to be civilized unless given the freedom to experiment. Leave them alone and let them suffer natural consequences. Dang it. If kids can't test boundaries because the line is around their feet, they grow into idiot adults.
Every kid I know uses that phrase. But every pregnant woman I know gets called Prego, and I haven't heard any complaints. People needs to calm down.
I think the "N" word needs to be used MORE! It's just too damn powerful...we need to use it until it doesn't mean anything anymore.
Yeah, thats pretty gay. But I must disagree with the "N" word. While I firmly belive that no one should use it, I definetly belive that even if an african-american does use it that DOES NOT give a white person the right to use it. I feel like if a white person uses that word, they should have their teeth knocked clean out. And I've done that on occasion.
You will be hearing from my lawyer..lol-actually, great article!