Researchers have determined that using a CT autopsy could replace current autopsy standards when investigating particular accidental deaths. Further, because a CT scan identifies the structure of the entire body, it is more sensitive than other types of examinations.
Researchers determined that the CT scan was able to successfully identify air embolisms, something that is commonly undetected by most technologies. However, it is important to note when there is a fatal trauma since it can be a contributing factor.
Using a CT scan for an autopsy can have many benefits. When a death is considered suspicious, typical autopsies must be concerned with destroying critical elements of the forensic evidence. This evidence would not be destroyed when a CT scan was performed.
Some religions or cultural beliefs prohibit physical autopsies that harm the body. By conducting a CT autopsy, these beliefs could be adhered to while the information was still obtained.
CT scans are much quicker than traditional autopsies, and may one day be used to compliment a traditional autopsy. When the victim has been shot, a CT scan can quickly locate bullet, bullet fragments, and bone fragments much quicker than a standard autopsy.
Finally, a CT autopsy is likely far less expensive than the cost of a traditional autopsy.
The concept of using CT scans in an autopsy is not new. Several other countries use this technology for this purpose already. However, it has been slow to catch on in the United States. In the U.S. it has only been used to conduct autopsies on a few American soldiers.
"CT is a sensitive imaging tool for detecting injuries and cause of death in victims of blunt trauma. When there are major injuries, such as those resulting from a motor vehicle accident, CT may provide enough information to enable a conventional autopsy to be avoided altogether," said Barry Daly, M.D., professor of radiology at the University of Maryland School of Medicine and radiologist at University of Maryland Medical Center in Baltimore.
In conducting this study, researchers compared the results from over 20 different autopsies. First these bodies were scanned using the whole-body CT scanner at the University of Maryland Medical Center. Two radiologists later interpreted the results.
After the CT autopsy was complete, a traditional forensic medical examiner conducted autopsies on the same bodies. When discussing the results of the CT autopsy, the forensic medical examiner found the data from the CT scan helpful.
Most of the autopsies, whether conducted by the radiologist or medical examiner, were comparable.
Source:
http://www.rsna.org/media/pressreleases/pr_target.cfm?ID=334
Published by Patty Oh
A self-employed writer and speaker, Patty has eclectic interests. She loves long road trips and the silence of swimming. An avid reader and SEO writer, she is also available for hire. View profile
- Crime and Beach Towns: Should There Be an Enforced Curfew?Everyone loves to have fun and do things that they normally might not do when they are on vacation. For many this includes pushing the limits of what is legal. Unfortunately some don't know what that line is, and that...
Halloween Celebrations in the Hartford, CT AreaThis article is all about Halloween celebrations. If focuses specifically on some of the best and most popular Halloween celebrations in the Hartford, CT area.
How to Get a Job in Computer ForensicsOver the last year there has been a dramatic increase in both the demand and salaries of computer forensics workers. In a recent UK study, the average minimum salary increased 1...- CrimeA short story I wrote about crime on October 14, 1999.
- Wave of the Future: Virtual Autopsy
- Crime and the Certainty of Punishment
- ADHD and Crime: Is Your Child at Risk?
- Crime busters Confidential-Getting Organized Crime to Quit It
- The Grim Truth About True Crime Drama
- The Three Best Crime Shows on Television
- Choice Theory and Trait Theory on Crime Control



