Senator Hillary Clinton is now pressuring the DNC to reconsider their decision to unseat the delegates from Michigan and Florida. Of course, since Clinton won Michigan and Florida, she would benefit most from having the delegates count for her this summer in Denver. Her push for the delegates to be recognized seems self-serving. But there is a larger problem brewing for the state of Florida that should be addressed. In 2000, Florida was the site of contentious and heated debate over hanging chads and ballot problems in several voting areas throughout the state. Does the DNC want to risk a debacle by forbidding delegates from participating in the Democratic convention?
Florida and Michigan's delegates should be counted at the convention, but both states knew what penalties were at stake when moving their primary dates up before February 5th. Losing delegates is effectively nullifying the ability of the states to decide who should be the nominee. If the winning the nomination comes down to the delegates from Michigan and Florida, these delegates will become a huge issue. None of the candidates want to offend voters by refusing them to be represented at the convention; if the nomination comes down to Florida's 210 delegates and Michigan's 156, any candidate might have objections to the DNC reversing the decision to unseat all of each states delegates.
Is it fair for the Democrats to loose all of their delegates while the Republicans only loose half of their delegates? Probably not. If parties are supposed to treat constituents equally, the DNC should restore half of the delegates to Florida and Michigan in order to dole out the same punishment as the RNC handed down to the states. The states still are being punished for moving the dates of their primaries, but the punishment is equal across the board. If the DNC restored half of the delegates back to each state, Clinton would gain ground and meaningful victories over Senator Barack Obama.
The only way these delegates will affect the Democratic nomination is to have a close race between Clinton and Obama. If Obama pulls away from the other candidates, the stripped delegates won't matter to the nomination process. However, the candidates need to show the voters of Michigan and Florida that they are an important part of the election process. Any one of the candidates should implore the DNC to reconsider the decision to strip the state of all of their delegates, but that doesn't mean they shouldn't be punished at all for breaking rules. If the DNC was interested in being fair, they would match the penalty imposed by the RNC and give half of the delegates back to Michigan and Florida.
Published by Bridget McCaleb
Gretchen is a native Texan who enjoys writing in her free time. She is currently employed in criminal justice but is looking to go back to school in the spring to finish her English degree. View profile
- Democratic National Committee Should Stand by Punishment They knew the consequences and broke the rules anyway. Therefore, Michigan and Florida are not entitled to have delegates in August.
- Analysis: Michigan Primary Vote Leaves Plenty of Unanswered Questions in President... McCain and Romney claim frontrunner status/
- Does it Have to Come Down to Super Delegates? Why neither candidate can win the nomination without super delegates
-
Hillary Clinton Pushing DNC to Reconsider Florida, Michigan Penalties
Hillary Clinton's campaign is asking the DNC to reconsider stripping Florida and Michigan of their delegates.
- Obama and Clinton Continue to Spar Over "Disenfranchised" Delegates Mike Gravel got to eat at a very nice steakhouse in Florida.
- Michigan and Florida Democratic Delegates Could Benefit Hillary Clinton for Party...
- Hillary Clinton Pushes for Recognition of Florida, Michigan Delegates
- John Edwards Endorses Barack Obama for President at Michigan Rally
- Analysis: The Importance of Super Delegates at the 2008 Democratic National Conven...
- Barack Obama Picks Up 10 Superdelegates to Tie Hillary Clinton; Is Now 164.5 Deleg...
- It's Wrong for Hillary Clinton to Push for Michigan and Florida Delegate Recognition
- Count the Votes in Florida and Michigan
|
|
- 10 things you need to know today: February 11, 2012 (The Week)
- Grammy Awards preview: Top 5 reasons to watch (The Week)
- No Fun Allowed: L.A. Beaches Ban Footballs, Frisbees, and Sand Digging (ContributorNetwork)
- Good day, bad day: February 10, 2012 (The Week)
- Obama's birth control compromise: 'Still unacceptable'? (The Week)
4 Comments
Post a Commentcount flo;rida and michigan in the ploslitical lprocess count (usa constitutinal rights)
One question: So Hillary says all votes should be counted, would she still fight for the FL and MI votes if she lost???? I dont think so!! - Hypocrite!!! Up until this point I at least had respect for her...oh well...
I completely agree - if those delegates had been at stake, it might have affected how hard each candidate campaigned in order to win the votes. The Democrats (except Hillary) avoided campaigning in Florida because they knew it wouldn't count anyway.
It's sad and unfair -
I think stripping a state of it's "people's VOICE" in this Primary, it is just that...our only moment for the people to say YES this is who I want to support. The DNC should play mediator not GOD. You can punish, but to strip a state's voice in an election is a travesty, in the political nominating process. We are the people...with voices...are we not?
SHAPE UP DNC
You hold no right on squelching the voice of this country. Even if they misbehave...limits within boundaries. Yes you did wrong Michigan and Florida but, I'll "LISTEN"...and follow the rules....