Hillary Clinton Still Running for President

Kidding Aside - Two Days to Go and McCain Brings Out the "Invisible Candidate"

Louisa Burgess
Am I the only person left who thinks Hillary Clinton should be elected President?

Let me explain. It took a while for me but I have come around to support Barack Obama. Truth be told, the choice of Governor Palin for running mate by John McCain put the nail in the coffin for him as far as I'm concerned. That's harsh I know. I believe I only voted for a Republican once in my life and that was in a local election and very, very long ago. I never really wanted to vote for McCain, I'll admit that. I did admire him and I did have serious doubts about Obama that had little to do with my fervent support of Clinton. So, momentarily I considered a reluctant vote for Senator McCain. It hinged for a brief period of time on his choice of running mate.

It stung when Obama chose Joe Biden. The Delaware Senator is a great senator and public servant but I sat in front of the television screaming, 18 million votes you dufus! How do you just ignore that many votes and the chance to make extraordinary history? But then it was shocking when McCain chose Sarah Palin, governor of a state, Alaska, with a population of 650,000 or so people, mayor of a city of less than 9,000. Then as if to put the icing on the cake, there was all that winking and smirking and Joe Six Pack talk. Obama began to look like the best thing since sliced bread. I had to admit, he is articulate and intelligent, makes sound decisions and he's a Democrat. I quickly forgot his ruthless opportunistic nature (truthfully that is common to politicians) and his disregard for 18 million Clinton supporters. I instantly forgave the Democratic National Committee their sexist leanings and Clinton hate/envy, and I noticed something as the general election progressed.

Both sides, Democrat and Republican, have spent a good deal of time courting Hillary voters. Senator Clinton is frequently mentioned by both campaigns. Even Obama's choice of Senator Biden speaks volumes about the need to garner votes from Hillary's base. Neither can win easily without Ohio, Florida and Pennsylvania and neither does as well in those places as Senator Clinton has. The white, working class voter is being pandered to, flirted with and campaigned for as never before and all either candidate needed was Hillary Clinton on his ticket! In my humble opinion all the country needed was Clinton running for President. Will Sarah Palin finish shattering that glass ceiling? Doubtful. It's a shame too. Other than the extreme right wing, is Palin pulling in many voters? Doubtful again.

The McCain campaign recognizes Clinton's worth. Today we learn they are using Hillary Clinton's voice in auto-calls seeming to endorse McCain. A clever snip out of context from the nasty Democratic Primary is the main message in this call. In it she calls McCain "experienced" and boils Obama down to one speech in 2004. OUCH! Will this matter? The pundits are saying it's too late. I'm hoping those white working class male voters are smarter than the McCain campaign gives them credit for and will realize that Hillary Clinton is supporting Obama - for real.

I can't help but notice how important Hillary Clinton remains in this presidential year. I can't ignore that my white, working class male friends who recalled the Clinton administration's years of peace and prosperity and enthusiastically supported Hillary for President are now waffling, undecided or have already gone back to being Republicans and have cast their votes for McCain. Hillary Clinton is the invisible candidate in this election.

Mostly I'm wondering why Senator Clinton isn't the one going to the White House in January.

Published by Louisa Burgess

Life long NYer. Expressing myself through the written word has been my lifelong hobby and vocation. Somehow I managed to raise two sons and actually worked for a living! Recently moved to Texas!Louisa Burges...  View profile

13 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Heather Carreiro11/15/2008

    Good analysis. I also decided to cast my vote for Obama after Palin came on the scene, although admitted I'm usually a third-party or Democrat supporter anyway. Let's see what job Hillary gets in Obama's new administration.

  • Heather Carreiro11/15/2008

    Good analysis. I also decided to cast my vote for Obama after Palin came on the scene, although admitted I'm usually a third-party or Democrat supporter anyway. Let's see what job Hillary gets in Obama's new administration.

  • Sheri Fresonke Harper11/4/2008

    Interesting :) Sheri

  • Darin Tripoli11/3/2008

    as always.. well done!! d:)

  • Sofya Blinder11/3/2008

    Funny, my mother and I were just talking about this in the car this morning. Job well done!

  • Louisa Burgess11/3/2008

    Sheryl, you are the most refreshing conservative I have ever met! :) There are two reasons the DNC didn't get around her..1) She's a woman. 2) Clinton envy. Plus there may have been a little bit of reverse racism..YES I said that! I believe they wanted to make sure they were the first to get a Black MAN to the White House.

  • Sheryl Young11/3/2008

    Hi Louisa - Having never been happy with McCain as the Republican front runner, Hillary looked better to me than Obama. At least we knew exactly what we were getting. We knew where she stood, and we knew how far and hard she fought to get where she was, despite whether or not we agreed with her on everything. I believe she would have protected the country. Not so sure with Obama. For me, there is still something fishy about why her party didn't get around her. For the record re: your comment to Tony - Palin wasn't this religious conservative's choice! Altho' I was happy it was a woman and not another old white guy, there were other women I would have preferred. I believe, though, that McCain knew more about Palin than we know he knew. Nice write!

  • Louisa Burgess11/3/2008

    Tony, I appreciate both your candor and your compliments :) Our differences are what makes horse races as my dad used to say. And it's always a pleasure to disagree with you!
    What turned me against Palin is her lack of credibility,and experience. But I concede that Obama is inexperienced also. The difference is that McCain picked Palin when he barely knew her or what she was capable of doing. He picked her because she was the religious right wing choice. In my humble opinion that wasn't a good reason.

  • Tony Vega11/2/2008

    Louisa, your skill is always impressive..and I certainly think we would be better off with a Clinton presidency than an Obama one...but the 3 stooges, Pelosi, Reid, & Dean, threw Hillary under the bus for The Proud One. I don't know what Palin did to turn you off so bad...to cause ya to overlook sooo many of Obama's failed policies dating back to wen he was a community organizer to a senator...& Biden's track record...not voting for the first Gulf War, voting for the Iraq war...and then the unspeakable...to segregate Iraq into 3 states hindering Freedom & Democracy..and then not supporting the surge...the only thing to counter Bush's mismanagement...& ALL of Biden's lies. Joe six pack?How about vilifying Joe the plumber for exercising the most basic of our rights? I would take Hillary any day over that radical lot...Hillary is a Democrat. Obama, Pelosi, Ried, Dean are not..they are so far left they transcend Party politics....

  • Momma J11/2/2008

    Great article. Can't say I support either one of them at this time. Hey, I'm starting to sound political or wishy-washy. Same difference.LOL

Displaying Comments
Next »

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.