In a stunning development, members of the House of Representatives on Tuesday night voted to strip virtually all funding ($1 billion) from the U.S. Food for Peace program. Food for Peace is the U.S. tool for fighting hunger overseas to promote stability and development.
Rep. Jason Chaffetz (Utah-3) proposed the amendment, which although approved Tuesday, was subsequently defeated Wednesday in a roll call vote by a margin of 338-83.
Supporters of the amendment to eliminate Food for Peace funding included Steve Chabot of Cincinnati, Ohio, Eric Cantor (VA), John Mica (FL), and presidential candidate Michele Bachmann of Minnesota. The complete roll call vote results are available here.
Several other amendments put forward also tried to reduce funding for Food for Peace and the McGovern-Dole international school meals program. These amendments were also defeated.
Nora O'Connell of Save the Children says, "As much as some politicians wish it were otherwise, it's not even feasible to balance our budget on the backs of the world's most vulnerable children and families. Humanitarian and poverty-focused programs make up only one half of one percent of the U.S. budget."
Save the Children currently has Food For Peace programs in Bangladesh, Guatemala, Ethiopia, Mozambique, Yemen, and Indonesia.
Since WWII the Food for Peace initiative has been a foundation for American foreign policy, feeding the hungry to promote world stability and development. It was officially signed into being as Public Law 480 by President Dwight Eisenhower.
However, recent budget proposals put forward by the House are trying to reduce funding for Food for Peace. With nearly one billion people hungry worldwide and high food prices, now is not the time to cut hunger fighting programs.
Cutting these programs harms America's own national security. Hunger and malnutrition threaten peace in Afghanistan, Yemen, Sudan, and other countries where U.S. foreign policy interests are at stake. You cannot win peace when people are hungry and desperate.
Congress may be eager to cut programs, but why go after essential ones that only represent a very tiny percent of the budget? If anything, Food for Peace should be given a boost in funding to help our foreign policy.
Even with the amendments defeated the struggle has just begun over the FY 2012 budget. The budget the House of Representatives has on the table now would still cut around $500 million from Food for Peace and McGovern-Dole.
For more information on the congressional cuts to food aid visit the World Food Program USA.
Article first published as House Members Try to Eliminate Food for Peace Program on Blogcritics.
Rep. Jason Chaffetz (Utah-3) proposed the amendment, which although approved Tuesday, was subsequently defeated Wednesday in a roll call vote by a margin of 338-83.
Supporters of the amendment to eliminate Food for Peace funding included Steve Chabot of Cincinnati, Ohio, Eric Cantor (VA), John Mica (FL), and presidential candidate Michele Bachmann of Minnesota. The complete roll call vote results are available here.
Several other amendments put forward also tried to reduce funding for Food for Peace and the McGovern-Dole international school meals program. These amendments were also defeated.
Nora O'Connell of Save the Children says, "As much as some politicians wish it were otherwise, it's not even feasible to balance our budget on the backs of the world's most vulnerable children and families. Humanitarian and poverty-focused programs make up only one half of one percent of the U.S. budget."
Save the Children currently has Food For Peace programs in Bangladesh, Guatemala, Ethiopia, Mozambique, Yemen, and Indonesia.
Since WWII the Food for Peace initiative has been a foundation for American foreign policy, feeding the hungry to promote world stability and development. It was officially signed into being as Public Law 480 by President Dwight Eisenhower.
However, recent budget proposals put forward by the House are trying to reduce funding for Food for Peace. With nearly one billion people hungry worldwide and high food prices, now is not the time to cut hunger fighting programs.
Cutting these programs harms America's own national security. Hunger and malnutrition threaten peace in Afghanistan, Yemen, Sudan, and other countries where U.S. foreign policy interests are at stake. You cannot win peace when people are hungry and desperate.
Congress may be eager to cut programs, but why go after essential ones that only represent a very tiny percent of the budget? If anything, Food for Peace should be given a boost in funding to help our foreign policy.
Even with the amendments defeated the struggle has just begun over the FY 2012 budget. The budget the House of Representatives has on the table now would still cut around $500 million from Food for Peace and McGovern-Dole.
For more information on the congressional cuts to food aid visit the World Food Program USA.
Article first published as House Members Try to Eliminate Food for Peace Program on Blogcritics.
Published by William Lambers
William Lambers is the author of Ending World Hunger. This book features over 50 interviews with officials from the UN World Food Programme and other charities discussing school feeding programs that fight c... View profile
- Differences in American Foreign Policy After World War I and World War IIThe American foreign policy vastly differed after World War I and World War II; however, foreign policy in one age would not work the same way in the next.
Foreign Policy is the Name of the Game at the First Presidential Debate...The agenda of both candidates will be revealed on how they are going to approach foreign policy should they be elected.- Analysis of Roll Call on HR 3997, Bailout VoteVirginia has 11 members of the House of Representatives in Washington. Do you know how your Congressman or Congresswoman voted on the Bailout bill?
President Obama's FY 2011 Federal Budget Lowers Taxes and DeficitPresident Obama's $3.834 trillion FY 2011 Federal Budget proposal contains "Tough Choices" along with critical investments in jobs, security and education.- Canadian Foreign Policy in the Post-Sept. 11 WorldPolicy changes have a global impact; reforms that Canada identified and implemented would send out ripple effects since Canada has long been considered stable & consistent
- Congress Planning Food Aid Cuts as Global Hunger Crisis Escalates
- George McGovern: A Food Ambassador for All Seasons
- Illinois House Supporting Constitutional Convention
- The World Food Programme Needs Funding to Expand School Feeding in Sudan
- Who's that Democrat Running for President?
- U.S. Food for Peace to Aid Conflict Victims in Cote D'Ivoire and Liberia
- Food for Peace and International Hunger




