House Republicans Fail to Act as Stock Market Drops, $1.2 Trillion Lost
Senate Acts: Passes $700 Billion Bill
While anxiety over the failure to pass the House bill reigned, the Senate passed their version of a $700 billion bill by a vote of 74-25 and sent it to the House.
By voting on its own rescue package, the Senate snatched the initiative from the House, which under the Constitution normally acts first on large spending bills. Officials on Capitol Hill told NBC News that Senator Harry Reid, D., Nev, was able to exploit a procedural provision to jump the line, seeking to put pressure on House members to get on board. .
While economists such as Mark Zandi, Chief Economist at Moody's Economy.com point out that the bill would settle the market, and quell panic, House Republicans, such as Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-Tex.), argue that such actions put the country on a "slippery slope toward socialism". Hensarling is the leader of a conservative caucus and Reaganomics is often used by Republicans as a bulwark against Socialism.
As mentioned in a previous article, "nearly all political decisions are based upon some kind of theory". And when it becomes obvious that a theory, as extreme as Reaganomics, has led to a major financial crisis, then intelligent people work on corrections. Fears of socialism are misplaced and simply represent the inability of Hensarling and others to intelligently alter their thinking and place the nation above their individual ideology.
Republicans are so sensitive to criticism of Reaganomics that they blamed House Majority Leader, Nancy Pelosi, D. Calif., for their votes against the bill when she pointed out that it was "fiscal irresponsibility, combined with an anything goes economic policy that has taken us to where we are today". Pelosi went on to correctly say that: "they (Republicans) claim to be free market advocates, when it's really an anything goes mentality. No regulation, no supervision, no discipline. And if you fail, you will have a golden parachute, and the taxpayer will bail you out".
Republican leader John Boehner, the Republican House Minority Leader, said that Ms Pelosi's speech had "poisoned" the Republican caucus and "caused a number of members we thought we could get to go south" making the difference in a 228-205 vote. Behner was joined by Roy Blunt, a House Republican whip, who accused Pelosi of introducing partisan discussion into the effort.
But by far the most egregious reason for voting against changes to Reaganomics was expressed by Congresswoman Michele Bachmann, R., Min., who blamed the economic problem on lending money to the lower class under the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA). She voted against the bill because it was "a return to socialism".
Republicans, like Bachmann, have been against the CRA since it was passed under the Carter Administration to prohibit financial institutions from targeting only wealthier neighborhoods, a practice known as "redlining."
Contrary to Bachmann's assertions, Professor of Law Michael S. Barr stated, in congressional testimony, said "that a Federal Reserve survey showed that affected institutions considered CRA loans profitable and not overly risky. In addition, Alex Schwartznotes that the CRA is "consistently successful in meeting their goals for mortgages, investments in low-income housing tax credits, grant giving to community-based organizations, and in opening (and keeping open) inner-city bank branches".
Clearly the economic problem was not caused by the CRA, nor is interventionist legislation socialism. Arguments to the contrary hinder and do not help the Nation resolve the current economic crisis. It's now up to the House to quell the markets and do something for Main Street.
Sources
Bachmann, Michele, "Statement on the Failure of the Bailout Bill", at: http://bachmann.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=104080
Bachmann, Michele, "How we got into this mess, and why we shouldn't just throw money at the problem", at"http://bachmann.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=103779
Barr, Michael. "Prepared Testimony of Michael S. Barr". U.S. House of Representatives.
Kane, Paul, Montgomer, Lori, and Branigin, William, "House Narrowly Defeats Bailout Legislation, at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/29/AR2008092900623.html?hpid=topnews
McGreer, Michael. M. "Adherence to Wrong Ideology Drives Market Crash," at: http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1067966/adherence_to_wrong_ideology_drives.html?cat=75
MSNBC and NBC News, "Both parties predict Senate to pass bailout 'Sweeteners' added with eye toward persuading reluctant House members", at: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26953481/
New York Times, "Transcript of Speaker Pelosi's Speech," http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/30/washington/30pelositranscript.html
Schwartz, Alex, "From Confrontation to Collaboration? Banks, Community Groups, and the Implementation of Community Reinvestment Agreements," http://www.innovations.harvard.edu/showdoc.html?id=3275
Shell, Adam, "Failed bailout vote hits Wall Street like a hurricane," at: http://www.usatoday.com/money/markets/2008-09-29-stocks-plunge-bailout_N.htm
Times Online, "Nancy Pelosi blamed for Wall Street bailout defeat," http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article4852384.ece
Washington, Post, Dow Jones Industrial Averages at: http://financial.washingtonpost.com/custom/wpost/html-qcn.asp?dispnav=business&symb=DJI&nav=el
Wikipedia, Michele Bachmann, at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michele_Bachmann
Wikipedia, "Community Reinvestment Act", at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Reinvestment_Act
Wikipedia, Jeb Hensarling", at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeb_Hensarling
Wikipedia, "Laissez Fare," at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laissez-faire
Wikipedia, "Reaganomics," at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reaganomics
Published by Michael Manford McGreer
Michael M. McGreer, Ph.D, writes and lectures on issues of historical or contemporary interest to political decision makers and people wishing to survive the consequences of public policy. View profile
- Best Lost Fan Sites Since its premier in 2004, Lost has been well received from both the public and the critics and rightfully so.
- Lost II: Lost: A Common Cultural KnowledgeA common core of shared knowledge has been lost. Could a modern American have a meaningful conversation and dialogue with his country-man of the 18th or 19th century?
- What to Do when You Find a Lost DogYou don't want to leave them where they can get hurt, so every animal lover will find themselves at least once in possession of a lost dog. Here are some great tips to help you reunite dog and owner.
Analyzing Popular Lost TheoriesMany names of the characters of the TV show "Lost" are referencing real people.
Nancy Pelosi Hosts Immigration Workshop, Bashes Republicans in SpeechIn an immigration workshop hosted by Speaker Nancy Pelosi, she praised immigrants, but bashed Republicans.
- Baltimore's Lexington Market
- Market Research is a Powerful Business Tool
- Let the Sun Set on the Patriot Act
- Best Ethnic Markets in Kansas City's River Market District
- How to Understand the Stock Market
- Helping a Lost Pet Home
- "Lost" Leaves Viewers More Lost
- Markets Crash: trillion-dollars lost in One Day on Wall Street
- Senate snatched the initiative from the House,
- Republicans fear Socialism and Pelosi




1 Comments
Post a CommentOne again this nation is polarized - the dems blame it on the reps, the reps on the dems. We all read what we want to read. The issue about Pelosi "poisoning" the votes was explained better but no one wanted to hear. She made it look partisian, in their opinion, so if the republicans signed on, they were taking the whole blame. If she was such a great leader, where was her common sense to make that speech afterward. Shows her dumbness. Even if you don't buy that, here's my question to all the dems blaming it on the republicans: 95 dems voted against it, if they so wanted to change what the republicans caused, why didn't they just vote and it would be done? Answer: it's all about politics - I don't want to get voted out. Leadership would have done what was best for the nation. So, if dems think the bill was so needed, pass it. So, where is the democratic leadership? In DC both parties are about saving my butt, not your money.