Attorney/Client Privilege: Never bring someone else into a meeting.
Any meeting that a client holds with his or her attorney is considered privileged unless the defendant brings in a third party to the meeting. For example, let's say that Anne wants to bring her son to a meeting with her attorney for moral support. If the prosecutor is made aware of the arrangement, he or she can question Anne's son in court as to the context of that meeting.
Attorney/Client Privilege: Conversations in public.
The attorney/client privilege only applies to conversations that take place in private. If you and your attorney are having a loud conversation in a restaurant or a park, and someone else overhears the substance of that conversation, then he or she can tell the prosecutor what was said. Likewise, if the prosecutor knows about the conversation, he or she can question the defendant about that conversation on the stand.
Attorney/Client Privilege: Prison phone monitoring.
Some prisons monitor (record) all ingoing and outgoing telephone calls, which means that if a suspect calls his or her attorney on the phone, and the conversation is recorded, the prison can submit the recording of the conversation to the prosecutor. This only applies if the suspect is informed of the phone monitoring practice. Otherwise, the conversation is considered an expected right to privacy.
Attorney/Client Privilege: Talking about the conversations to someone else.
This is often called the "blabbermouth" syndrome, and it's a bad idea for suspects of a crime. If you have a conversation with your attorney, and then reveal the substance of that conversation to your best friend, the conversation is no longer privileged. The only instance in which this does not apply is conversations between a husband and wife.
The best thing that you can do when it comes to the attorney/client privilege is to do your best to keep all conversations as private as possible. Don't have them in public, don't discuss them with friends, don't bring in anyone else and don't use monitored prison phones. Your attorney should do his best to make sure that the privilege is maintained, but he or she cannot control what you do outside of the office or prison.
Published by Steve Thompson
Steve is a full-time freelance writer. In addition to the more than 3,000 articles he's written for AC, he has also written articles and other materials for more than 100 happy clients. He enjoys writing abo... View profile
- Why White Privilege is Being Taught in Post Secondary EducationTo understand what is meant by "White Privilege" is to make sense of racial tension and discrimination.
- White Privilege and the Movie Crashthe concept of white privilege is discussed.
- Defamation of Character: Was Absolute Privilege or Qualified Privilege Involved?When accusing someone of defamation of character, it is not uncommon for the accused to use privilege, both absolute and qualified, as a defense in the case.
NECCO Sweetheart Conversation Hearts Introduces Animal Inspired Sayings...Everyone loves the sweet, pastel colored Sweetheart (R) Conversation Hearts. For 2007 the company introduces animal-inspired sayings. Information about the candy hearts history.
Constitution Showdown: Or Just a Question of Privilege?The Constitution does not refer to executive privilege at all, and some "strict constructions" believe that the very idea is unconstitutional.
- What You Need to Know About the Attorney-Client Privilege
- February 29th: The Ladies' Privilege to Propose Marriage
- The Key to Teaching ESL Conversation Classes
- Make a Conversation Heart Picture Frame for Your Valentine
- Top 10 Conversation Starters While Traveling
- 10 Airport/Airplane Conversation Starters
- Six Tips for Making Conversation with Strangers
- The privilege is waived if the client talks about a conversation to others.
- The privilege is waived if the client brings another person to a meeting.
- The privilege is waived if the conversation is held in public where others can hear.





1 Comments
Post a CommentCan you give me a Court Case that validifies the statement that prison-monitored calls waive the right?