The Good Samaritan Law will usually protect a person who helps in an emergency situation if they act the same way a reasonable and prudent person would act in the same situation. For instance, a reasonable and prudent person would only move an injured person if that person's life were in danger and moving them would help to save their life. An example of that would be a person in a car accident is injured and the car is on fire. The person may be injured, but leaving them in a car that is on fire would certainly result in death, so, moving the person in this situation would be reasonable and expected.
Another example is that a reasonable and prudent person would be sure to ask a conscious person for their permission before giving any care. If a person is conscious, they have the right to refuse care so we should always ask them if it is okay for us to help if they are conscious. On the other hand, if a person is unconscious, a reasonable person would assume that care is wanted and give care as they know how.
A reasonable and prudent person would always check for any life-threatening conditions before giving further care. If a person is bleeding severely, stopping the bleed would be a priority along with treating the person for shock. Shock is a medical emergency, and needs to be treated by medical personnel immediately.
A reasonable and prudent person would call 9-1-1 or their local emergency response number. They would not hesitate; they would make the call or have someone else do so.
A reasonable and prudent person would also stay with the person who is injured until help arrives to take over. Once you begin caring for a person, you should always continue care until help arrives to take over, preferably until an ambulance arrives on the scene and the EMTs tell you that they can take over. When the ambulance arrives on the scene, they may take a moment or two before they can actually take over care. You should wait until the medical personnel tells you that they are ready.
The Good Samaritan Laws were created to encourage people to help others in an emergency without fear of legal repercussions. These laws will protect a Good Samaritan who uses common sense and only does what they are trained to do in an emergency situation. For example, if you are helping a person and you are not trained in the medical field at all, you are not going to try to perform a tracheotomy on that person. You do not know exactly how to do it, and it would not be reasonable to do so.
It is rare that a non-professional who attempts to help in an emergency situation is actually sued. These non-professional helpers are commonly known as lay-responders. In the rare instance that a lay-responder is sued, the Good Samaritan Laws protect them from any financial responsibility. As long as the lay-responder acts in a reasonable and prudent manner, only provides the type of emergency care that they have been trained to do, uses common sense, does their best to save a life and not cause further harm to the person they are helping, they are covered under the Good Samaritan Law.
In such cases where a lay-responder is deliberately negligent or reckless and causes the person more harm, or when the lay-responder leaves the person after beginning care and before help arrives, the courts do not feel they are protected under the Good Samaritan Laws.
You can find out more about the Good Samaritan Laws in the state you live in by contacting a local legal professional person or checking with your library.
The information in this article comes from a professional CPR and First Aid instructor, as well as the American Red Cross.
Published by LMG
Wife, mother, aspiring business woman. Family is very important to me. I am fortunate enough to have a very loving and supportive family. Whether near or far, we are always there for each other. View profile
- ChaCha: Make Money Helping Others Search the WebChaCha is a new social search engine that allows you to as a searcher to search the web with the live help of a ChaCha guide. The guide chats with you through an instant messaging system to help you look for the info...
- Microsoft Being Sued Because of Ultimate TVMicrosoft is being sued by a group of investors. They are being accused of stealing and tricking these inventors out of the technology used for Microsoft's Ultimate Tv digital video recorder system.
Company Being Sued by Man's Long-lasting ErectionThe makers of the health drink Boost Plus are currently being sued by Christopher Woods, of New York. Woods claims that the vitamin-enriched drink gave him an erection that woul...- The Broad Scope of Negligence & the Implication of Good Samaritan LawsWhen charged with negligence, your attorney must disprove any one of the three elements of negligence or base your actions on Good Samaritan laws
- The Truth About Helping Others with the Law of AttractionYou might think that by helping others, it is helping you demonstrate how to apply the Law of Attraction through compassion and gratitude.
- Professional Ethics in Good Samaritan Laws, Civil Disobedience and More
- What You Should Know when You're Being Sued
- Good Samaritan Laws
- Courtney Love Being Sued by Drug Rehab Facility
- Former American Idol Contestant Being Sued for Masturbating
- Google's YouTube on Hot Seat Once Again - Being Sued by Viacom for U.S.$1 Billion
- Woody Harrelson Being Sued for Assault



