How Are Liberals Really Different From Conservatives Fiscally?
It is true that conservatives live to lower taxes, and conservative lawmakers count on the fact that you and I don't look any deeper into the issue than , "Oh! Lower taxes, that's a good thing!" Lower taxes for who? Everyone? Not so fast. Conservatives believe that higher earners should get lower taxes only, and therefore more rewards, to put it simply. Liberals just have a different take on it. They believe that if you are a higher earner, you already get more rewards, and the tax breaks should go to those who we refer to as the working poor, who make up most of our country now. Liberals believe it makes no sense to keep pushing money at people who already have more than enough, and that we all have a responsibility to the people who keep America successful. To conservatives, those who keep America going are the stock brokers and the CEO's, whereas liberals, in just one more example of our vastly different points of view, consider the steel workers, the waitresses, farmers, and teachers to be the backbone of our country. Conservatives will refute this truth all day, but the proof is in the pudding. You can get a tax break on your brand new gas guzzling Hummer, but not the used car you bought with money from your two jobs to get your kids to school and back. This is but one of many examples of how diffferent liberals and conservatives are. Liberals do not hope to tax the country into prosperity. We hope to tax the rich into bridging the financial gap. Remember, the gap that is now causing the poor to get poorer, and the rich to get richer? Liberals do not, contrary to what conservatives (and S.L. Bradish) would have you believe, just want to throw money at the working poor. They want to put it into funding adequate childcare, healthcare, housing and development. Liberals really are different from conservatives fiscally, in that their idea of prosperity is looking out for the masses, and right now in America, the masses are living below poverty level. There should never be billions of dollars, and government funded programs to keep the rich rich. They can do that for themselves.
How Are Liberals Really Different From Conservatives Socially and Morally?
The biggest myth about liberals is that they are unpatriotic and immoral. This is according to the sweeping generalizations of the conservative doctrine. I'll just give you a few examples and let you make your own conclusions, instead of telling you that if you disagree you shouldn't be an American.
Liberals believe that what individuals do with their bodies is their choice. In other words, the choices they make are between them and their higher power, not between them and Jerry Falwell. Liberals believe that the death penalty should be abolished, because it is state sponsored murder, proven as a weak deterrent against crime, and we're finding more and more that innocent men and women have been executed. Conservatives believe that every life is sacred, except the lives of poor people, inmates, and soldiers in Iraq. Conservatives would like to make the decision as to whether a woman can have an abortion or not, but they don't need any evidence to send a fully developed teenager to die thousands of miles away for oil.
Liberals believe in civil and human rights, for all. Without exception, without limit. Conservatives have a much different take. They believe, (because Jesus W. Bush said it, so it must be true) that our country should be able to indefinitely hold foreign prisoners without charge, take away protections against horrific abuse, put people on trial on hearsay evidence, and on the rare occasion when trials are even granted them, sentence people to death based on testimony literally beaten out of witnesses.
Liberals believe in religious freedom for all Americans, without the detrimental interference of the government. They believe in children being allowed their own prayers, not those led (or coerced by) school administrators. A lot of conservatives think that liberals and the ACLU want all religion abolished. But most of us just don't want government employees forcing us into praying to their god or spending our tax money to preach their religion. Conservatives believe in state-sponsored force-fed christianity, without thought of the results of such mass alienation. And the melting pot becomes the stuff of legend. We all must be christians, who keep our heads down and don't dissent. Sound familiar? That's because it's the doctrine used in the past by the Nazi regime. So the conservatives would have you believe that they are more moral. How can they be moral and intolerant at the same time?
Conservatives believe that if you have to get on welfare, you should be made to pay that welfare back by cleaning public toilets, and other humiliating practices. Conservatives do not believe in assessing public assistance on an individual basis, reworking the whole idea of welfare, and then funding it so that it can be available to those who truly need it. They're all about formulas (and boy how it's worked so far!). Conservatives don't have a problem with welfare, as long as it's corporate. Liberals believe that if you've paid taxes in this country, you deserve help when you need it. What a novel idea! And most everyone in this country has needed it at some point in time, unless you're born with a silver foot in your mouth (RIP Ann Richards). If you're a conservative, you want to apply a different (new testament) bible verse to every situation that is clearly not working, and pretend that when it isn't it's the fault of some non-believing immoral tree-hugger.
If you're a liberal, you believe everything isn't so cut and dry, and there are times when everyone needs to pitch in. For instance, liberals believe in this radically different and new idea that healthcare should be available to all, and that income should never enter into the quality of care a person receives. Everyone deserves the same high level of care that the rich now corner the market on. In order to do that, health insurance as we know it must be abolished, and everyone's tax money, especially those with higher than average incomes, should go to pay for it. You can slice it and dice it and Hillaryize it all you want, but it's very simple. Where it becomes complicated is when multi-billion dollar industries are threatened with change. After all, isn't it easier to downsize factory work, so it's only poor people who lose everything, than it is to downsize fortune 500 firms? Conservatives believe it's every man for himself, and people must earn their way out of crappy healthcare, living conditions, and bad education.
I will not be addressing the paragraph in S.L. Bradish's article that speaks to racism, because the paragraph itself is absurd, and bigoted. I think the best way to show how liberals are really different from conservatives is to let you read that for yourself. It's a disgrace, I can tell you that much. How are liberals really different from conservatives socially and morally? One could write a thousand volumes. But you get the idea.
How Are Liberals Really Different From Conservatives? The War on Terror
This is an easy one. We were lied to. Conservatives believe you support the president no matter what. That's not so bad, in theory. However, here we have a man who has repeatedly, and blatantly, stepped on the backs of over 3,000 murdered Americans to push his father's unfinished Iraq agenda. Even G.H.W. Bush looks ashen when asked about this issue. Some liberals feel they can chortle with delight at the President now that he's finally been revealed to 80% of the country as a dictator, but I hesitate to do that when I know it's taken so many lives in Iraq to finally wake people up to the fact that the War on Terror is a farse. Ms. Bradish refers to liberals 'kissing terrorist butts' in this part of her article, which I find sad. I can't remember, so please remind me, readers. Was it a democratic president who made his first calls on September 11, 2001, to have the Bin Laden family safely moved out of the country? Is it a democratic president who still can't answer the question ,"Why haven't we gotten Bin Laden?" Those kooky liberals feel strongly that we need to make sure we're dealing with terrorists before we perpetrate genocide. Conservatives believe we need to make a parking lot of out any country who is poorer than us, but has oil to provide us. There is no War on Terror, only a war on ourselves.
We now live in a country that is run like a failing business. We are handled, spun, and herded around like sheep. All in the name of more money, and more oil, and less dissent. Conservatives will blame the media until the cows come home, but without the media to at least provide us with a different view, we are the modern equivalent of Cold War Russia.
How are liberals really different from conservatives? This article wasn't written to address all the differences, but rather to stir more discussion and debate, and to present a kind of accountability to the people who perpetuate the lie that is being daily heaped upon us. To give those of us who have never cared about politics a chance to see where we stand, because now is the time to stand for something. I applaud S.L. Bradish for standing for something, weak and slimy as it is. She is a microchosm of the conservative point of view. If you can't bully people into listening, give them a bad rating, give yourself a higher one, invent support, and watch the dominoes fall. Whether this article empowers you or enrages you, do your own research and form your own opinion based on fact.
So, back to our original question: How are liberals really different from conservatives? Let us count the ways, and count them correctly. Please get out and vote.
Published by Megan Smith
I'm a nomad now living back at home in Amarillo, Tx. I have a 12 year old daughter who keeps me busy as well as a successful career. My writing has taken me far considering it is still in its infancy. You c... View profile
- Liberals Argue Conservatives Must Be More like Them to Regain Congress & the Presi...Are these fine upstanding Liberals offering Conservatives constructive advice, or is there something else afoot?
- Liberal Views and LiberalismPolitical views differ from individual to individual but through examination of views held by Liberals and Conservatives, I have determined that my views are consistent with Liberal positions on several issues.
- Does Your Child Qualify for the Hope Education Tax Credit?The hope education tax credit is for students or for the people who claim students as dependents, and allows for a $1,500 tax credit subject to income requirements. Read on to find out if your dependent meets the req...
- Politics Aside: Discussing Issues as American Citizens, Not as Liberals and Conser...In our hyper-politicized nation, political labels are affixed to people as soon as they voice an opinion. This series seeks to address current issues rationally by keeping politics out of it. Feedback and suggestion...
- 2008 Elections - Less Spending, Lower Taxes, More JobsMiddle class Americans have been penalized enough by the economic meltdown and the Wall St. crash. Shouldn't the focus of both campaigns be creating more jobs, controlling spending, and keeping tax low?
- The War Between Liberals and Conservatives
- Liberals V. Conservatives
- Why We Hate Liberals
- The Advantages and Disadvantages of American and Canadian Healthcare
- Conservatives: Run for Your Lives
- Terrorism and Iraq: The Connection Neither Liberals nor Conservatives Want to Talk...
- The Difference Between Liberals and Conservatives
- A flair for the obvious.
- Conservatives believe if you don't agree, you are unpatriotic.
- You must know how different the two parties are make an informed vote.
- Liberals believe in freedom of religion.


44 Comments
Post a Comment"Show me a young man that is not a liberal, and I will show you a young man without a heart. Show me an old man who is not conservative, and I will show you an old man without a brain." Mark Twain
A great idea for school paper, but the real life proves you and other liberals wrong over and over again. And it will keep on proving you wrong.
It is funny, but liberal ideas are always find support among students, unemployed, and etc. Ones you own a house and start making more than a minimum wage - you become a conservative. It is just in human nature - we do not like sharing. Ups..., sorry we like sharing as long as we get something in return, but if as a result of social justice we lose something - we are very much against it.
No, I am not Christian, no I am not super reach, no I am not a CEO of big corporation, and no I do not get any tax break from our government. But I hope that one day, if I keep on working hard, I will get reworded. And when it happens I would hate to see my money go to someone who chose to set back all these years and do absolutely nothing.
This is what America is all about - you work hard and achieve something. And not "don't worry, your country will h
Dear Beth Allen,
Thank you for this article. Thank you for the detail. Thank you for speaking the truth. I can boldly say I am a liberal. God Bless America!
Dear Beth Allen,
Thank you for this article. Thank you for the detail. Thank you for speaking the truth. I can boldly say I am a liberal. God Bless America!
We Libertarians embody the best of both worlds. Socially liberal, fiscally conservative. In essence, people should be free to do whatever they choose as long as others are not deprived of their rights to life, liberty, or property in the process.
Most conservative social ideals unfortunately are based on self impose morality rather than freedom. And unfortunately most liberal fiscal ideals are flat-out based on plunder.
You are off the mark somewhat. A true Conservative believes in interpreting our Constitution as it is written, unless it is lawfully amended, which includes votes by the people at the state level for ratification purposes. A liberal believes the Constitution is a "living document" which the Supreme Court can even amend at will, which is not within their proscribed powers at all. If Social Security was to be implemented, or the Federal Reserve, or the 16th Amendment taxing the "labor" of American citizens as a direct tax, it needed to be put before the people, not simply amended by the states without their knowledge or consent. The Neocons are liberals, make no mistake, and Bush's interpretations were so liberal, he threw it out.
You have attempted to define the parties from both sides, but where are the moderates? And where are the left wing nuts? To me, this again is bias because you didn't show the far left but you accentuated the rar right. I'm a Guiliani republican, that's quite a long way from The Christian Coalition. Nice writing again, though.
I appreciate your comment, however, I don't think you'll find a sympathetic ear here for S.L. Bradish. She is a judgmental, greedy human being, aside from politics. She never hesitates to give herself most of her pageviews, or rate her own articles into the stratosphere, even when they are subpar at best,as far as writing ability. So, again, thank you for your comment. But this kind of smear has come at me and other writers in so many different forms now that it doesn't phase me at all, because the criticisms are not valid. They are groupthink, and they are poisonous, so it's best not to address them unless you absolutely have to. I've addressed you, and I've addressed her. That will be all the time now that you get from me. Thanks.
However, I wanted to add that I agree with Tim's opinion about the lack of a true political left-wing in America. The dominant figures of the Democratic party that are referred to as liberal are anything but - Clinton, Biden, Schumer, etc. The true liberals are marginalized big time, which is why the Dem Party ahss become such a weak opposition party.
Very, very well done Beth. By the way, you beat me to the punch with this essay. But seriously, you represent the true beliefs of the American liberal point of view.