While a no compete clause might help keep your company secrets away from rivals, it also keeps your former employee from finding a similar job to the one that was just lost. In some specialized fields like marketing and accounting, this could be devastating financially for a person. I have seen no compete clauses that go on for three months to over a year.
If a worker is bound by a no compete clause, he or she has to decide to either wait out the entirety of the no compete clause, or find a job in a different field. Jobs in other fields can cause for questions by interviewers in the future. I have looked oddly at resumes when I see that an accountant worked a register for a few months at Target. Little did I know at the time that it was to get by during the run of a no compete clause.
Also, depending on how the no compete clause is worded, it might cause a worker undue stress when looking for a position. The example that I like to use is a former no compete clause of one of the major auto companies that stated that the company would reserve the right to pursue legal action against a former employee simply for, "suspicion of sharing sensitive company information with another company." I have had workers tell me that they were nervous because legal action could be brought to easily.
I have never been a fan of no compete clauses. I understand the reasoning for them when it comes to high-ranking officials in a company, but not for the common worker. These types of contractual clauses, in an extreme case could lead former employees to financial crisis. If your company secret was worth causing a person to lose a house, or worse, maybe it should have never been shared in the first place.
More from this contributor:
Parking Lot Considerations When Choosing a Small Business Location
How Formatted Interview Questions Are Hurting the Interview Process
Published by L. Vincent Poupard - Featured Contributor in Arts & Entertainment and Travel
L. Vincent Poupard is known for his insightful news commentaries and unique takes on the entertainment industry. Along with his career in writing, he works as a political/business consultant and has helped b... View profile
- Cell Phone Sponsors Spark Debate in NASCARIt is understandable that Nextel prefer to be the only telecommunication company associated with NASCAR, but at the same time, it is vital that their strict stance not be the primary reason for the possible demise of...
- Quixtar Wins Abstention vs. TEAM in CaliforniaTEAM has lost another challenge in court vs. Quixtar, this time in California.
- Judge Denies Quixtar's Contempt Charges Against TEAMA judge in Texas has denied Quixtar's accusations that TEAM is trying to steal away their IBOs. Read what the judge had to say.
- TEAM Wins Restraining Order vs. QuixtarIn the ongoing battle between Quixtar and it's former training partners TEAM (headed by Orrin Woodward and Chris Brady), TEAM has managed to win this latest legal victory
- Quixtar Wins Decisions in LawsuitA Michigan judge ruled in favor of Quixtar on several injunctions filed by former associates.
- Issues to Pay Attention to when Signing a No-Compete Clause for Work
- Non-Compete Clauses: A Powerful Weapon in the Hands of Temp Agencies
- T-Mobile FlexPay Vs. Virgin Mobiles No Contract Monthly Plans
- Seven Secrets to Job Interview Success
- Non-Compete Agreements: Are They Always Legal?
- Matt Hardy Released by WWE
- Interview with One of the OMEGA Wrestling Founders Thomas Simpson



