To me and more and more Americans, the obvious answer is yes. Nothing truly has made sense since the attacks on our country made in September 2001. The basic security measures which were not taken speak volumes - we were attacked from within yet our own borders have remained open since that date. Non U.S. citizens were not only not requested to leave our country while it was redressing these heinous actions, but the Bush Administration formented the Security and Prosperity Partnership with Canada and Mexico, facilitating travel and trade throughout North American will little, if any, security checks for persons entering from those countries. During his last 100 days of office, President Bush expanded these VISA waiver countries to include 34 additional countries - including Great Britain, home of the shoe bomber. President Obama has chosen as his new Secretary of Homeland Security Governor Janet Napolitano, a governor who saw and contributed to by her inaction, a rise in property thefts and violent crimes in Arizona due to the continued open borders, and while calling out the National Guard, basically disempowered them also as Bush did in the prosecution of two American border agents for merely doing their jobs which resulted in 9 and 12 year prison terms due to a mere violation of an interdepartmental policy, mind you, not law and in which a convicted Mexican drug dealer with a superficial gunshot wound to the butt was given immunity by the USDOJ. If anything, post 9/11 our nation's position with respect to foreign policy has been that of continued appeasement of the demands of foreign nations, especially Mexico. This once great nation has become the global appeaser of the world. Even the War in Iraq, unlawful also under the terms of our Constitutuion, has been conducted in the position of appeasers to the new Iraqi government - a government which would not have existed at all if we had not unlawfully "intervened" in their own internal civil war deposing their dictator, and now securing their towns cities and borders, while continuing to ignore our own.
This spending/stimulus package was simply a continuation of the failed Bush policies and all those that went before it. The "Big Oil" and S&L bailouts of the 80's in particular - which actually is what lead in part to today's nightmare, along with the September 2008 bailout of most of Congress's campaign contributors in that "global" bank bailout which for the first time included not simply U.S. financial institutions, but a global one. It doesn't take a mental giant to make the leap that this stimulus/spending package is simply an extention of the agenda of the New World Order global socialists esconsced now on Capitol Hill, no matter what their political stripe. The greater the debt, the more it "stimulates" foreign investment. The more foreign investment, the more global corporations and concerns will have a voice with our policy makers. Right now, apparently, it is much greater than that of the lawful citizenry since spending bills are now being rushed through at a record pace, and including more and more "padding," foreign aid and graft in the process. Hence, we are still in a no win war, and also now bailing out global conglomerates at the American people's expense. We continue to hand out foreign aid like Santa Clause, while in truth our nation should be calling in some of those debts which have yet been repaid. I believe France's debt is literally over 200 years old right now.
In saving and salvaging our U.S. economy, if Washington was truly interested, the founder's had a method and it is incorporated within our founding documents. It is called "protectionism." The members of Congress and the economists that trash the protectionism concept are merely global socialists looking out for the global economy, and not the U.S. economy at all. The ones who have unconstitutional tied in our economy with that of other nations progressively. These are the members of the Global Socialist Party, not Democrats or Republicans, but Global Socialists no matter which former party affiliation they still publicly embrace, in their voting records and stances they are of a "global" not "American" mindset and mentality. The amnesty advocates, and open borders crowd. The "human rights" and UN proponents above and beyond America and their countrymen's rights.
Protectionism and the founder's basic philosophy and beliefs would result in making America once again the truly industrial giant and major exporter of the world. It would result in more and more of the corporations which have moved off shore to move once again back home to America. How would protectionism cure the outsourcing problem? By placing the import taxes once again on products that are made outside the U.S. This provision in a minor form was originally included in the stimulus, but the Global Socialist contingent were successful in having it removed by using the "threat" of trade wars - a truly minor threat since America right now has the greatest trade deficit of any of the major powers in the world currently. Also, in order to facilitate domestic production and competitiveness, removing the tax deductions from former U.S. domiciled corporations who are primarily using foreign labor would also encourage these corporations to "hire American" once again. It would be painful initially due to the fact that Wasington has let this situation balloon out of control far too long, but the end result during the Hoover years when such practices were re-instituted was that America once again became the industrial leader of the world, building quality products in demand the world over. With American prospering, and not turning into the third world nation that it is at the present time, dependent upon cheap Chinese goods due to the progressive reduction in our manufacuring base, and depressed wages. Insofar as imported labor, then either that labor is taxed at a higher rate than American labor again as an "import tax" or the tax on America labor is removed and only "foreign import" taxes on labor are instituted once again as the founder's intended. They did not intend for American's to pay a tax on the fruits of their labor in any manner whatsoever for the benefit of the federal government as can be evidenced by their no "direct" taxation provisions.
The solutions are there. It is the Global Socialist Party that are preventing and undermining the provisions in the Constitution that the founder's created in order to protect America and Americans that have created this manipulated crisis. And their members spread on both sides of the aisle. That is why even with a "change" of administrations, so long as it is a member of the Global Socialist Party elected, the only true "change" is a "change" in the mouthpiece. And at this point I am truly wondering if some of these claimed "layoffs" are also merely "firings" of U.S. worker's in order that the Global Socialist member corporations can continue to increase their outsourcing as partners in this global socialism agenda with their masters, the Fed and the bankers, and their representatives, the Global Socialist Party members on Capitol Hill, i.e., Reid, Pelosi, McCain, and any and all Senators, Congressmen or Cabinent members who also hold membership in the Council on Foreign Relations, the "educational" branch of this political party, and the true political "corporate" party affiliation of the Global Socialists.
Published by Betsy Ross
Former legal professional and long time resident of the State of Arizona. Have written numerous articles for publication with respect to private property rights, immigration and Constitutional issues. View profile
- Barack Obama Among Oprah's Favorite ThingsOprah said she'd support Barack Obama for president, even before he announced he was running. Here's a look back at some of her comments.
- Barack Obama Addresses Newton, Iowa, Crowd on December 30Barack Obama (D, IL)spoke to a crowd of would-be caucus-goers in Newton, Iowa at the Newton Senior High School on December 30th, and obliquely rebutted some of the charges being aimed at him by other front-runners in...
Barack Obama Rally in Tiny Boone, Iowa, Draws Hundreds Just Days Before...Iowans come out despite sub-freezing temperatures, on New Year's Eve, to hear Barack Obama speak in the final days before the Iowa 2008 caucuses.- Has There Been a Coup of the US Government?http://www.shvoong.com/law-and-politics/politics/political-philosophy/1749082-coup-government/
- Liberal New York Times Writer Fails in His Opinion of the Bush 2008 Stimulus Plan A liberal New York Times opinion writer is against the 2008 tax stimulus plan. His opinion of the stimulus plan is wrong and his idea of what America needs is ignorant and may hurt the democrats.
- Moving Yourself: Is it Really Worth It?
- 10 Things You Really Need for Baby's First 6 Months
- Barrack Obama in the Democratic National Convention
- Barrack Obama: His Time in the Illinois State Senate
- Barack Obama Criticized for No Longer Wearing Flag Lapel
- A Conversation with Barack Obama
- John Edwards Supporters vs. Barack Obama Suppoters




1 Comments
Post a CommentGood job done here.